docs: add evaluator design checklist#33
Open
skyzer wants to merge 1 commit into
Open
Conversation
yogendrahexo
force-pushed
the
docs/evaluator-design-checklist
branch
from
c71c8d7 to
46f3791
Compare
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Summary
results.jsonconventions, and anti-gaming review questionsWhy
SIA optimizes the metric emitted by
evaluate.py. The existing evaluation guide explains the mechanics of writing an evaluator; this adds guidance for making that evaluator a reliable optimization target instead of a brittle or gameable score.Test plan
python3 -m ruff check .python3 -m pytest -q