First draft of adding Interaction Model examples #46

yogeshbdeshpande · 2022-01-25T12:46:36Z

@henkbirkholz : Please let me know, your views as to how is the information flow and anything else, we need to add?

henkbirkholz · 2022-01-25T16:01:42Z

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

@@ -327,8 +327,7 @@ Appraisal procedures are application-specific and can be conducted via compariso
 The final output of the Verifier are Attestation Results. Attestation Results constitute new Claim Sets about the properties and characteristics of an Attester, which enables Relying Parties, for example, to assess an Attester's trustworthiness.

 ### Models and example sequences of Challenge/Response Remote Attestation
-According to RATS Architecture Document{{-RATS}}, two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation has been proposed. This sections highlights the 
-information flow bewteen the Attestor, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.
+According to RATS Architecture Document, two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation has been proposed. This sections highlights the information flow bewteen the Attestor, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.


Suggested change

According to RATS Architecture Document, two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation has been proposed. This sections highlights the information flow bewteen the Attestor, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.

According to the RATS Architecture , two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation have been proposed. This sections highlights the information flows between the Attester, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.

henkbirkholz · 2022-01-25T16:05:50Z

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

 ~~~~

 2. BackGround Check Model

-The background-check model is so named because of the resemblance of how employers and volunteer organizations perform background checks. In this model, the attestation sequence is initiated by a Relying Party. The Attestor conveys Evidence to the Relying Party. Upon receiving evidence the Relying Party initiates a session with the Verifier. Once session is established, it forwards the received Evidence to the Verfier. The Verifier, compares the received Evidence to its appraisal policy for evidence and returns an Attestation Result to the Relying Party. The Relying Party then compares the 
+The background-check model is so named because of the resemblance of how employers and volunteer organizations perform background checks. In this model, the attestation sequence is initiated by a Relying Party. The Attestor conveys Evidence to the Relying Party. Upon receiving evidence the Relying Party initiates a session with the Verifier. Once session is established, it forwards the received Evidence to the Verfier. The Verifier, compares the received Evidence to its appraisal policy for evidence and returns an Attestation Result to the Relying Party. The Relying Party then compares the


Suggested change

The background-check model is so named because of the resemblance of how employers and volunteer organizations perform background checks. In this model, the attestation sequence is initiated by a Relying Party. The Attestor conveys Evidence to the Relying Party. Upon receiving evidence the Relying Party initiates a session with the Verifier. Once session is established, it forwards the received Evidence to the Verfier. The Verifier, compares the received Evidence to its appraisal policy for evidence and returns an Attestation Result to the Relying Party. The Relying Party then compares the

The background-check model is so named because of the resemblance of how employers and volunteer organizations perform background checks. In this model, the attestation sequence is initiated by a Relying Party. The Attester conveys Evidence to the Relying Party, which does not process its payload, but relays the message and optionally checks it's signature against a policed trust anchor store. Upon receiving the evidence the Relying Party initiates a with the Verifier. Once session is established, it forwards the received Evidence to the Verfier. The Verifier appraises the received Evidence according to its Appraisal Policy for Evidence and returns a corresponding Attestation Result to the Relying Party. The Relying Party then checks the

thomas-fossati · 2022-01-26T17:50:32Z

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

+
+1. Passport Model
+
+The passport modle is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this Model, the attestation sequence is a


Suggested change

The passport modle is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this Model, the attestation sequence is a

The passport model is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this model, the attestation sequence is a

thomas-fossati · 2022-01-26T17:51:18Z

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

@@ -326,6 +326,74 @@ As soon as the Verifier receives the Evidence and the Event Logs, it appraises t
 Appraisal procedures are application-specific and can be conducted via comparison of the Claims with corresponding Reference Values, such as Reference Integrity Measurements.
 The final output of the Verifier are Attestation Results. Attestation Results constitute new Claim Sets about the properties and characteristics of an Attester, which enables Relying Parties, for example, to assess an Attester's trustworthiness.

+### Models and example sequences of Challenge/Response Remote Attestation
+According to the RATS Architecture, two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation have been proposed. This sections highlights the information flows bewteen the Attestor, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.


Suggested change

According to the RATS Architecture, two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation have been proposed. This sections highlights the information flows bewteen the Attestor, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.

According to the RATS Architecture, two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation have been proposed. This sections highlights the information flows bewteen the Attester, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.

thomas-fossati · 2022-01-26T17:55:34Z

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

+
+The passport modle is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this Model, the attestation sequence is a
+two step procedure. In the first step, an Attester conveys Evidence to a Verifier which compares the Evidence against its appraisal policy.  The Verifier
+then gives back an Attestation Result to the Attester, which simply caches it. In the second step, the Attester presents the Attestation Result (and possibly additional Claims/evidence) to a Relying Party, which then compares this information against its own appraisal policy to establish the trustworthiness of the attestor.


Suggested change

then gives back an Attestation Result to the Attester, which simply caches it. In the second step, the Attester presents the Attestation Result (and possibly additional Claims/evidence) to a Relying Party, which then compares this information against its own appraisal policy to establish the trustworthiness of the attestor.

then gives back an Attestation Result to the Attester, which simply caches it. In the second step, the Attester presents the Attestation Result (and possibly additional Claims/evidence) to a Relying Party, which then compares this information against its own appraisal policy to establish the trustworthiness of the attester.

Will correct this in next revision!

thomas-fossati · 2022-01-26T17:56:40Z

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

+     |                                                            |                                      |
+     |   attestationResults <-----------------------------------  |                                      |
+     |                                                            |                                      |
+     | attestationResults(evidence, results) ----------------------------------------------------------> |      |                                                            |                                      |


there seems to be a problem with NL here

Sure thanks Thomas, will look into this later today!

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

William-PanWei · 2022-01-26T03:40:42Z

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

@@ -326,6 +326,74 @@ As soon as the Verifier receives the Evidence and the Event Logs, it appraises t
 Appraisal procedures are application-specific and can be conducted via comparison of the Claims with corresponding Reference Values, such as Reference Integrity Measurements.
 The final output of the Verifier are Attestation Results. Attestation Results constitute new Claim Sets about the properties and characteristics of an Attester, which enables Relying Parties, for example, to assess an Attester's trustworthiness.

+### Models and example sequences of Challenge/Response Remote Attestation
+According to the RATS Architecture, two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation have been proposed. This sections highlights the information flows bewteen the Attestor, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.


Suggested change

According to the RATS Architecture, two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation have been proposed. This sections highlights the information flows bewteen the Attestor, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.

According to the RATS Architecture, two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation have been proposed. This section highlights the information flows between the Attestor, Verifier, and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.

William-PanWei · 2022-01-26T03:40:56Z

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

+
+1. Passport Model
+
+The passport modle is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this Model, the attestation sequence is a


Suggested change

The passport modle is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this Model, the attestation sequence is a

The passport model is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this Model, the attestation sequence is a

William-PanWei · 2022-01-26T03:42:00Z

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

+1. Passport Model
+
+The passport modle is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this Model, the attestation sequence is a
+two step procedure. In the first step, an Attester conveys Evidence to a Verifier which compares the Evidence against its appraisal policy.  The Verifier


Suggested change

two step procedure. In the first step, an Attester conveys Evidence to a Verifier which compares the Evidence against its appraisal policy. The Verifier

two-step procedure. In the first step, an Attester conveys Evidence to a Verifier, which compares the Evidence against its appraisal policy. The Verifier

William-PanWei · 2022-01-26T03:42:52Z

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

+
+The passport modle is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this Model, the attestation sequence is a
+two step procedure. In the first step, an Attester conveys Evidence to a Verifier which compares the Evidence against its appraisal policy.  The Verifier
+then gives back an Attestation Result to the Attester, which simply caches it. In the second step, the Attester presents the Attestation Result (and possibly additional Claims/evidence) to a Relying Party, which then compares this information against its own appraisal policy to establish the trustworthiness of the attestor.


Suggested change

then gives back an Attestation Result to the Attester, which simply caches it. In the second step, the Attester presents the Attestation Result (and possibly additional Claims/evidence) to a Relying Party, which then compares this information against its own appraisal policy to establish the trustworthiness of the attestor.

then gives back an Attestation Result to the Attester, which simply caches it. In the second step, the Attester presents the Attestation Result (and possibly additional Claims/evidence) to a Relying Party, which then compares this information against its own appraisal policy to establish the trustworthiness of the Attester.

William-PanWei · 2022-01-27T02:02:32Z

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

+.----------.                                                .----------.                            .----------.
+| Attester |                                                | Verifier |                            | R. P.    |
+'----------'                                                '----------'                            '----------'


The width of this diagram exceeds the width limitation of the I-D.

William-PanWei · 2022-01-27T02:06:19Z

draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md

+
+2. BackGround Check Model
+
+The background-check model is so named because of the resemblance of how employers and volunteer organizations perform background checks. In this model, the attestation sequence is initiated by a Relying Party. The Attester conveys Evidence to the Relying Party, which does not process its payload, but realys the message and optionally check its signature against a policed trust anchor store. Upon receiving the evidence the Relying Party initiates a session with the Verifier. Once session is established, it forwards the received Evidence to the Verfier. The Verifier, appraises the received Evidence according to its appraisal policy for Evidence and returns a corresponding Attestation Result to the Relying Party. The Relying Party then checks the Attestation Result against its own appraisal policy to conclude attestation.


Suggested change

The background-check model is so named because of the resemblance of how employers and volunteer organizations perform background checks. In this model, the attestation sequence is initiated by a Relying Party. The Attester conveys Evidence to the Relying Party, which does not process its payload, but realys the message and optionally check its signature against a policed trust anchor store. Upon receiving the evidence the Relying Party initiates a session with the Verifier. Once session is established, it forwards the received Evidence to the Verfier. The Verifier, appraises the received Evidence according to its appraisal policy for Evidence and returns a corresponding Attestation Result to the Relying Party. The Relying Party then checks the Attestation Result against its own appraisal policy to conclude attestation.

The background-check model is so named because of the resemblance of how employers and volunteer organizations perform background checks. In this model, the attestation sequence is initiated by a Relying Party. The Attester conveys Evidence to the Relying Party, which does not process its payload, but relays the message and optionally checks its signature against a policed trust anchor store. Upon receiving the evidence the Relying Party initiates a session with the Verifier. Once the session is established, it forwards the received Evidence to the Verifier. The Verifier appraises the received Evidence according to its appraisal policy for Evidence and returns a corresponding Attestation Result to the Relying Party. The Relying Party then checks the Attestation Result against its own appraisal policy to conclude attestation.

First draft of adding Interaction Model examples

1882627

yogeshbdeshpande requested a review from henkbirkholz January 25, 2022 12:46

yogeshbdeshpande added 2 commits January 25, 2022 08:00

Minor tidy up for further alignment

c6ab50b

Fix some indentation

d56dbd1

henkbirkholz requested changes Jan 25, 2022

View reviewed changes

yogeshbdeshpande added 3 commits January 25, 2022 12:20

Incorporating review comments

37e5a3d

Incorporating review comments

cb76f64

Fixing minor typo

e918295

henkbirkholz assigned henkbirkholz and yogeshbdeshpande Jan 26, 2022

yogeshbdeshpande added 2 commits January 26, 2022 12:51

Fix typos

8e2b32c

Fix typo

23bc4c5

henkbirkholz merged commit e449406 into master Jan 26, 2022

thomas-fossati approved these changes Jan 26, 2022

View reviewed changes

William-PanWei suggested changes Jan 27, 2022

View reviewed changes

William-PanWei reviewed Jan 27, 2022

View reviewed changes

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

First draft of adding Interaction Model examples #46

First draft of adding Interaction Model examples #46

yogeshbdeshpande commented Jan 25, 2022

henkbirkholz Jan 25, 2022

henkbirkholz Jan 25, 2022

thomas-fossati Jan 26, 2022

thomas-fossati Jan 26, 2022

thomas-fossati Jan 26, 2022

yogeshbdeshpande Jan 26, 2022

thomas-fossati Jan 26, 2022

yogeshbdeshpande Jan 26, 2022

William-PanWei Jan 26, 2022

William-PanWei Jan 26, 2022

William-PanWei Jan 26, 2022

William-PanWei Jan 26, 2022 •

edited

Loading

William-PanWei Jan 27, 2022

William-PanWei Jan 27, 2022

	According to RATS Architecture Document, two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation has been proposed. This sections highlights the information flow bewteen the Attestor, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.
	According to the RATS Architecture , two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation have been proposed. This sections highlights the information flows between the Attester, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.


		1. Passport Model

		The passport modle is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this Model, the attestation sequence is a

	The passport modle is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this Model, the attestation sequence is a
	The passport model is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this model, the attestation sequence is a

	According to the RATS Architecture, two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation have been proposed. This sections highlights the information flows bewteen the Attestor, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.
	According to the RATS Architecture, two reference models for Challenge/Response Attestation have been proposed. This sections highlights the information flows bewteen the Attester, Verifier and Relying Party undergoing Remote Attestation Procedure, using these models.

	then gives back an Attestation Result to the Attester, which simply caches it. In the second step, the Attester presents the Attestation Result (and possibly additional Claims/evidence) to a Relying Party, which then compares this information against its own appraisal policy to establish the trustworthiness of the attestor.
	then gives back an Attestation Result to the Attester, which simply caches it. In the second step, the Attester presents the Attestation Result (and possibly additional Claims/evidence) to a Relying Party, which then compares this information against its own appraisal policy to establish the trustworthiness of the attester.

	two step procedure. In the first step, an Attester conveys Evidence to a Verifier which compares the Evidence against its appraisal policy. The Verifier
	two-step procedure. In the first step, an Attester conveys Evidence to a Verifier, which compares the Evidence against its appraisal policy. The Verifier


		2. BackGround Check Model

		The background-check model is so named because of the resemblance of how employers and volunteer organizations perform background checks. In this model, the attestation sequence is initiated by a Relying Party. The Attester conveys Evidence to the Relying Party, which does not process its payload, but realys the message and optionally check its signature against a policed trust anchor store. Upon receiving the evidence the Relying Party initiates a session with the Verifier. Once session is established, it forwards the received Evidence to the Verfier. The Verifier, appraises the received Evidence according to its appraisal policy for Evidence and returns a corresponding Attestation Result to the Relying Party. The Relying Party then checks the Attestation Result against its own appraisal policy to conclude attestation.

First draft of adding Interaction Model examples #46

First draft of adding Interaction Model examples #46

Conversation

yogeshbdeshpande commented Jan 25, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

William-PanWei Jan 26, 2022 • edited Loading

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

William-PanWei Jan 26, 2022 •

edited

Loading