Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix daigrams #47

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 26, 2022
Merged

Fix daigrams #47

Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
1 commit
Select commit
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
8 changes: 4 additions & 4 deletions draft-ietf-rats-reference-interaction-models.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -331,9 +331,9 @@ According to the RATS Architecture, two reference models for Challenge/Response

1. Passport Model

The passport model is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this Model, the attestation sequence is a
The passport model is so named because of its resemblance to how nations issue passports to their citizens. In this model, the attestation sequence is a
two step procedure. In the first step, an Attester conveys Evidence to a Verifier which compares the Evidence against its appraisal policy. The Verifier
then gives back an Attestation Result to the Attester, which simply caches it. In the second step, the Attester presents the Attestation Result (and possibly additional Claims/evidence) to a Relying Party, which then compares this information against its own appraisal policy to establish the trustworthiness of the attestor.
then gives back an Attestation Result to the Attester, which simply caches it. In the second step, the Attester presents the Attestation Result (and possibly additional Claims/evidence) to a Relying Party, which then compares this information against its own appraisal policy to establish the trustworthiness of the attester.

~~~~
.----------. .----------. .----------.
Expand All @@ -358,7 +358,7 @@ then gives back an Attestation Result to the Attester, which simply caches it. I
| attestationResults <----------------------------------- | |
| | |
| attestationResults(evidence, results) ----------------------------------------------------------> | | | |
| | | | | | appraiseResults()
| | | | | | appraiseResult()
| | |
~~~~

Expand All @@ -385,7 +385,7 @@ The background-check model is so named because of the resemblance of how employe
| evidence, eventLogs -------------------------------------> | |
| | |
| | handle, evidence, eventLogs -------> |
| | |appraiseEvidence()
| | |appraiseEvidenc()
| | |
| | attestationResults <--------------- |
| | (evidence, results) |
Expand Down