Get rid of LabelImage, add image_label field directly to Image#19
Open
tlambert03 wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
Open
Get rid of LabelImage, add image_label field directly to Image#19tlambert03 wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
tlambert03 wants to merge 4 commits intomainfrom
Conversation
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #19 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 97.59% 97.81% +0.21%
==========================================
Files 28 28
Lines 1413 1417 +4
==========================================
+ Hits 1379 1386 +7
+ Misses 34 31 -3 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
the
LabelImageclass is confusing. (it's the zarr.json you might find inside of a labels/ group that contains the annotation multiscales data.LabelImage IS just an Image with an additional field... so the whole thing can be expressed (with less cognitive overload i think) as just adding an optional field to Image. This does that, and gets rid of the additional top level class.