docs: backfill missing CHANGELOG entries (2.4.1, 2.4.3-2.4.7) - #8
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Backfills 6 missing
CHANGELOG.mdentries —2.4.1,2.4.3,2.4.4,2.4.5,2.4.6,2.4.7— none of which had a changelog entry despitehaving shipped. Each entry was reconstructed from the actual git history
(
git diffbetween the relevant version-bump commits), not written frommemory or invented:
bump, zero code diff against 2.4.0). Documented as such rather than
silently omitted.
task-ts7-01–04):parse failures were previously logged but didn't affect exit code or
the "all clean" message on any of the 6 CLI modes; now they force a
non-zero exit and an honest message.
typescriptrange pinned<7.0.0. Newtest/cli-failure-accounting.test.js.sigstorepublish-workflow bug pinned around, perf-gate threshold4.5x→5.0x) plus the GitHub Pages documentation site launch
(
scripts/build-pages-docs.js,docs-site/).bug fix (lists/bold/links weren't consistently handled), and a big
README trim now that the full walkthrough lives on the docs site.
A short disclosure note is added at the top of
CHANGELOG.mdstatingthese entries were reconstructed retroactively and on what date, so
nothing is presented as if it were written contemporaneously.
No code changes —
CHANGELOG.mdonly. The public GitHub Pageschangelog page renders directly from this file at build time
(
scripts/build-pages-docs.js'srenderChangelog()readsCHANGELOG.mditself, no separate copy to keep in sync) — verified locally in a scratch
copy that
node scripts/build-pages-docs.jspicks up all 8 versions(2.4.0–2.4.7) correctly with no rendering errors.
Related issue
Chintan's feedback:
CHANGELOG.mdhad no entries between 2.4.3 and 2.4.7,and was missing 2.4.1 — a trust/credibility gap for a project whose whole
pitch is "no AI, no surprises." This closes that gap with git-verified
content only; nothing was fabricated to fill space.
Checklist
npm testpasses locally — no code changed by this PR, so no testregressions possible; skipped a full re-run for this doc-only change.
CHANGELOG.md— this PR's entire purpose.Follow-up (not in this PR)
docs/backlogdoesn't have per-version tickets for 2.4.3–2.4.7 pointingback to individual commits (
task-ts7-*covers 2.4.3's content, but2.4.4–2.4.7 have no backlog trail at all). Worth a future decision on
whether every release needs a backlog entry going forward, or whether
CI/CD-only and docs-only releases are exempt.