Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: improve code documentation and type safety #238

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

CreeptoGengar
Copy link

@CreeptoGengar CreeptoGengar commented Dec 27, 2024

This PR includes several improvements to the codebase:

  1. Code Documentation Enhancements:

    • Added detailed Russian documentation for the main processing steps
    • Improved code comments clarity and structure
    • Added explanatory comments for configuration sections
  2. Type Safety Improvements:

    • Added explicit type annotations for path variables
    • Improved null-safety in chain sorting logic
    • Fixed property name case convention (logo_URIs → logo_uris)
  3. Code Formatting:

    • Improved configuration object readability
    • Better structured excludes array
    • Added logical grouping for processing steps

These changes make the code more maintainable and easier to understand for new contributors while maintaining the existing functionality.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes

    • Improved consistency in property naming for chain data aggregation.
    • Enhanced robustness of sorting logic for chain properties.
  • Documentation

    • Updated comments for clarity and added examples in the main processing script.
  • Style

    • Standardized code formatting, including consistent use of semicolons and explicit variable typing.

These changes:

- Fix a stylistic error in the property name.
- Make the code more robust when handling undefined values.
- Improve type safety.
The proposed improvements include:

More detailed and structured documentation.
Explicit type declarations for path variables.
Improved formatting of the exclusion configuration.
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 27, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces minor refinements to two TypeScript files in the API source code. In aggregateChains.ts, there's a modification to the chain properties naming convention and sorting logic, specifically changing logo_URIs to logo_uris and enhancing the string comparison method. In main.ts, the changes are primarily cosmetic, involving improved comments, consistent formatting, and explicit type declarations for directory path variables.

Changes

File Change Summary
_api/src/aggregateChains.ts - Renamed logo_URIs to logo_uris
- Updated sorting logic for pretty_name and chain_name to handle undefined/null cases more explicitly
_api/src/main.ts - Enhanced comments with more detailed script description
- Added explicit string type declarations for directory variables
- Standardized formatting with consistent semicolon usage

Poem

🐰 In the realm of code, where rabbits hop and type,
Lowercase logos and comments shine so bright,
Semicolons dance, types declared with care,
Our API's elegance beyond compare!
A subtle change, a programmer's delight 🖥️

Tip

CodeRabbit's docstrings feature is now available as part of our Early Access Program! Simply use the command @coderabbitai generate docstrings to have CodeRabbit automatically generate docstrings for your pull request. We would love to hear your feedback on Discord.


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
_api/src/main.ts (1)

34-39: Use regex literals to comply with static analysis guidance.

Replacing new RegExp("\\.") and new RegExp("^_") with literal syntax (/\./ and /^_/) improves readability and static analysis.

Proposed change:

excludes: [
  "testnets",
  "devnets",
-  new RegExp("\\."),
-  new RegExp("^_")
+  /\./,
+  /^_/
]
🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)

[error] 37-37: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.

Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.

(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)


[error] 38-38: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.

Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.

(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 57714e5 and 390955b.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • _api/src/aggregateChains.ts (2 hunks)
  • _api/src/main.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
_api/src/main.ts

[error] 37-37: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.

Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.

(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)


[error] 38-38: Use a regular expression literal instead of the RegExp constructor.

Regular expression literals avoid some escaping required in a string literal, and are easier to analyze statically.
Safe fix: Use a literal notation instead.

(lint/complexity/useRegexLiterals)

🔇 Additional comments (18)
_api/src/aggregateChains.ts (2)

16-16: Great job standardizing the naming convention.

Replacing "logo_URIs" with "logo_uris" aligns with a consistent lowercase naming style and improves discoverability and consistency.


36-38: Sorting logic looks good.

The revised function uses a clear fallback for chain.pretty_namechain.chain_name'', ensuring no runtime errors if both are undefined. This improves type safety and readability.

_api/src/main.ts (16)

2-3: Helpful overview in the doc comments.

Providing an outline of the script’s purpose right at the top improves clarity and makes the codebase more approachable for new contributors.


4-5: Step-by-step documentation is beneficial.

Enumerating steps ensures that developers understand the workflow and can locate relevant sections more easily.


6-8: Excellent example of URL transformation.

Including a concrete before/after illustration makes it clear how the script modifies asset references.


10-11: Thanks for explaining the chain aggregation step in detail.

Elaboration on the data that gets included builds confidence in the result and helps future maintainers follow the logic.


13-13: Clear mention of image optimization.

This additional context about the final step ensures the workflow is fully documented.


16-17: Semi-colon usage and import statements.

Consistent semicolons and neatly separated imports align well with typical TypeScript style guidelines.


18-19: Utility imports are clear.

Grouping utility functions from "./utils" clarifies the categorical separation of code functionalities.


20-21: Proper import for chain aggregation logic.

This ensures the aggregateChainData function can be traced and understood easily from its usage point.


23-24: Path setup is clearly defined.

Deriving __filename and __dirname from import.meta.url is a good strategy for ESM environments.


26-29: Explicit type annotations enhance type safety.

Declaring rootDir: string, srcDir: string, and distDir: string reduces ambiguity and improves maintainability.


31-33: Concise commentary for directory operations.

Stating the purpose of deleting and copying the directory right before the call site makes the code’s intent instantly clear.


40-40: No issue found with this line.


42-42: Retrieving file paths is straightforward.

Naming the result dirs helps keep track of the directories later in the script.


44-46: Well-documented URL update step.

Separating the URL replacer logic and calling it here improves modularity and clarity.


47-49: Chain data aggregation is neatly integrated.

The function call to aggregateChainData matches the explanation in your documentation. Good consistency!


50-51: Image optimization stage is properly staged at the end.

Finalizing the workflow with image optimization is consistent with your documented steps.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant