Skip to content

[OVEP] Fix to increase provider value upto 2048 characters #807

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2025
Merged

[OVEP] Fix to increase provider value upto 2048 characters #807

merged 1 commit into from
Sep 11, 2025

Conversation

jatinwadhwa921
Copy link

ankitm3k
ankitm3k approved these changes Sep 10, 2025
View reviewed changes
Copy link

@ankitm3k ankitm3k left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@preetha-intel
Copy link

LGTM
As a follow up , can we move reshape_input and layout to config file as well?
As we see in this scenario where there are multiple inputs it gets tricky for the user to specify it as provider_option. As we have support for config file already it should be part of config making the user experience better.
@MayureshV1 Do you see it feasible to move the reshape_input and layout that are specific to OV model manipulations part of config file?

@jatinwadhwa921 jatinwadhwa921 force-pushed the jatin_provider_value_len branch from e12bdf5 to 76f98d3 Compare September 11, 2025 06:36
@jatinwadhwa921 jatinwadhwa921 merged commit a5bd8ee into ovep-develop Sep 11, 2025
6 of 8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@ankitm3k ankitm3k ankitm3k approved these changes

@preetha-intel preetha-intel preetha-intel approved these changes

@sfatimar sfatimar Awaiting requested review from sfatimar

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@jatinwadhwa921 @preetha-intel @ankitm3k