Skip to content

Conversation

@JohananOppongAmoateng
Copy link
Contributor

fixed the issue where polymorphic_primary_key_name was incorrect for models with custom primary keys

Closes #758

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 83.40%. Comparing base (4882c73) to head (1db064d).
⚠️ Report is 2 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #795      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.34%   83.40%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          27       27              
  Lines        1615     1621       +6     
  Branches      256      255       -1     
==========================================
+ Hits         1346     1352       +6     
  Misses        206      206              
  Partials       63       63              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@bckohan bckohan force-pushed the primary-key-name-regression branch 2 times, most recently from 5f0db2d to f98b07d Compare January 5, 2026 06:51
…phic model pk, also issue a deprecration warning for it and remove its internal usage
@bckohan bckohan force-pushed the primary-key-name-regression branch from f98b07d to 1db064d Compare January 5, 2026 06:54
@bckohan bckohan merged commit 1641509 into jazzband:master Jan 5, 2026
41 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

polymorphic_primary_key_name no longer points to base classes polymorphic field

2 participants