Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixes #12266 - InvocationType improvements and cleanups. #12299

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: jetty-12.1.x
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

sbordet
Copy link
Contributor

@sbordet sbordet commented Sep 23, 2024

  • Removed usages of AbstractConnection.getInvocationType().
  • Changed HTTP server-side Connection implementations to use AbstractConnection.fillInterested(Callback) with a callback that specifies the InvocationType, derived from the Server, which derives it from the Handler chain.
  • Changed client-side receivers to use AbstractConnection.fillInterested(Callback) with a callback that specifies the InvocationType, derived from the HttpClientTransport.
  • Introduced HttpClientTransport.getInvocationType(Connection), so that client applications can specify whether they block or not.
  • Made sure client-side HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 return tasks with the proper InvocationType to be run by the ExecutionStrategy when calling application code.
  • HTTP3StreamConnection now uses an EITHER fillable callback to possibly process streams in parallel.
  • QuicStreamEndPoint now uses a task to invoke FillInterest.fillable(), rather than invoking it directly, therefore honoring the InvocationType of callback set by the Connection associated with the QuicStreamEndPoint.

* Removed usages of `AbstractConnection.getInvocationType()`.
* Changed HTTP server-side Connection implementations to use `AbstractConnection.fillInterested(Callback)` with a callback that specifies the `InvocationType`, derived from the `Server`, which derives it from the `Handler` chain.
* Changed client-side receivers to use `AbstractConnection.fillInterested(Callback)` with a callback that specifies the `InvocationType`, derived from the `HttpClientTransport`.
* Introduced `HttpClientTransport.getInvocationType(Connection)`, so that client applications can specify whether they block or not.
* Made sure client-side HTTP/2 and HTTP/3 return tasks with the proper `InvocationType` to be run by the `ExecutionStrategy` when calling application code.
* HTTP3StreamConnection now uses an `EITHER` fillable callback to possibly process streams in parallel.
* `QuicStreamEndPoint` now uses a task to invoke `FillInterest.fillable()`, rather than invoking it directly, therefore honoring the `InvocationType` of callback set by the `Connection` associated with the `QuicStreamEndPoint`.

Signed-off-by: Simone Bordet <[email protected]>
}

@Override
public InvocationType getInvocationType()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't the InvocationType be precomputed in the constructor?

@Override
public InvocationType getInvocationType()
{
return getHttpDestination().getHttpClient().getTransport().getInvocationType(delegate);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't the InvocationType be precomputed in the constructor?

@Override
public InvocationType getInvocationType()
{
return getConnector().getServer().getInvocationType();
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't the InvocationType be precomputed in the constructor?

fillInterested(httpConnection);
}

private void fillInterested(HttpConnectionOverFCGI httpConnection)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I find this helper confusing, inlining it would be clearer IMHO.

@@ -210,6 +212,11 @@ public void onOpen()
}
}

void setFillInterest()
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Now there is both fillInterested() and setFillInterest() methods, with no real explanation about which should be used when.

{
@Override
public void onDataAvailable(Stream stream)
{
Stream.Data data = stream.readData();
logger.info("onDataAvailable {}", data);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This should be logged at debug level.

@@ -286,21 +286,31 @@ public boolean handle(Request request, Response response, Callback callback) thr
@Override
public void onHeaders(Stream stream, HeadersFrame frame)
{
System.err.println("SIMON: frame = " + frame);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Debug log?

}

@Override
public void onDataAvailable(Stream stream)
{
Stream.Data data = stream.readData();
System.err.println("SIMON: data = " + data);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Debug log?

if (LOG.isDebugEnabled())
LOG.debug("fillInterested {}", this);
getEndPoint().fillInterested(_readCallback);
fillInterested(_readCallback);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm growing a feeling that this method should be removed and be replaced by fillInterested(Callback callback).

response.write(false, null, Callback.NOOP);
// Wait to force the client to invoke the content
// callback separately from the headers callback.
Thread.sleep(500);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You could await that queue contains "*-headers" instead.

@lorban
Copy link
Contributor

lorban commented Sep 24, 2024

It seems org.eclipse.jetty.server.ServerConnectorHttpServerTest.testNonBlockingInvocationType() is failing because of these changes.

@gregw
Copy link
Contributor

gregw commented Nov 8, 2024

@sbordet status of this?

@sbordet
Copy link
Contributor Author

sbordet commented Nov 8, 2024

@gregw need to resume working on it, but necessary.

Should be re-thought after #12395.

Copy link
Contributor

@gregw gregw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

changes necessary as per comments above

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 👀 In review
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants