Skip to content

feat(nvim): swap diffview.nvim for the maintained diffview-plus fork - #48

Merged
jinyeow merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/nvim-diffview-plus
Jul 31, 2026
Merged

feat(nvim): swap diffview.nvim for the maintained diffview-plus fork#48
jinyeow merged 1 commit into
mainfrom
feat/nvim-diffview-plus

Conversation

@jinyeow

@jinyeow jinyeow commented Jul 31, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

sindrets/diffview.nvim has had no commits since 2024-06-13 and carries 130
open issues; the PR-review workflow (gm, ado-pr.nvim, review-ado-pr)
depends on it. dlyongemallo/diffview-plus.nvim is the active fork and keeps
the diffview module namespace plus the :Diffview* commands, so
config/diffview.lua and its keymaps are unchanged.

The existing opts need no migration: the fork's documented breaking changes
cover file_panel.show (not set), flat log options (not set), and win_config
nesting (already nested).

The old lockfile key is removed rather than left beside the new one - the
offline plugin installer provisions every lockfile entry, so a stale key
would put a second lua/diffview/ on the packpath on offline machines.

sindrets/diffview.nvim has had no commits since 2024-06-13 and carries 130
open issues; the PR-review workflow (<leader>gm, ado-pr.nvim, review-ado-pr)
depends on it. dlyongemallo/diffview-plus.nvim is the active fork and keeps
the `diffview` module namespace plus the :Diffview* commands, so
config/diffview.lua and its keymaps are unchanged.

The existing opts need no migration: the fork's documented breaking changes
cover file_panel.show (not set), flat log options (not set), and win_config
nesting (already nested).

The old lockfile key is removed rather than left beside the new one - the
offline plugin installer provisions every lockfile entry, so a stale key
would put a second lua/diffview/ on the packpath on offline machines.
@jinyeow
jinyeow merged commit 9870327 into main Jul 31, 2026
5 checks passed
@jinyeow
jinyeow deleted the feat/nvim-diffview-plus branch July 31, 2026 07:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant