Skip to content

Comments

Review merge request suggestions#17

Merged
jsonify merged 2 commits intomainfrom
claude/code-review-suggestions-011CUzt3cniF5LUBa2jGNMyQ
Nov 10, 2025
Merged

Review merge request suggestions#17
jsonify merged 2 commits intomainfrom
claude/code-review-suggestions-011CUzt3cniF5LUBa2jGNMyQ

Conversation

@jsonify
Copy link
Owner

@jsonify jsonify commented Nov 10, 2025

Refactor logging and bundle loading in Lite components:

  • Replace print statements with os.log.Logger for structured logging
  • Use Bundle.module for resource bundle access (Swift 5.3+ standard)
  • Remove hardcoded magic numbers for cursor dimensions
  • Add proper log levels (debug, info, error) for different scenarios

This improves code maintainability, follows Swift best practices, and provides better log management for production use.

Refactor logging and bundle loading in Lite components:

- Replace print statements with os.log.Logger for structured logging
- Use Bundle.module for resource bundle access (Swift 5.3+ standard)
- Remove hardcoded magic numbers for cursor dimensions
- Add proper log levels (debug, info, error) for different scenarios

This improves code maintainability, follows Swift best practices, and provides better log management for production use.
@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @jsonify, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly refactors the Lite components by modernizing their logging and resource bundle management. It transitions from basic print statements to the os.log.Logger framework for structured and level-based logging, and adopts the Bundle.module standard for accessing resources, which simplifies bundle discovery. Additionally, it improves code clarity by replacing magic numbers related to cursor dimensions with a named constant.

Highlights

  • Structured Logging: Replaced all print statements with os.log.Logger for structured, categorized, and level-based logging across SimpleClickEngine and SimpleCursorManager.
  • Modern Bundle Access: Adopted the Bundle.module standard for accessing resource bundles, simplifying resource discovery and aligning with Swift 5.3+ best practices for Swift Package Manager.
  • Code Clarity: Eliminated hardcoded 'magic numbers' for cursor dimensions by introducing a named constant, improving readability and maintainability in SimpleCursorManager.
  • Improved Log Management: Implemented appropriate log levels (debug, info, error) for different scenarios, enhancing the ability to filter and analyze logs during development and production.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request is a great step forward in improving the maintainability and robustness of the Lite components. The transition from print statements to a structured os.log.Logger is well-executed and uses appropriate log levels. Simplifying the bundle loading to use Bundle.module is a significant improvement that aligns with modern Swift Package Manager practices. I've added a couple of suggestions to further enhance maintainability by centralizing constants, but overall, these are solid changes.

Address CI build failures and additional code review suggestions:

**Build Fixes:**
- Add CustomStringConvertible conformance to SimpleClickEngine.ClickType
- Fix NSSize os.log interpolation by using String(describing:)

**Code Quality Improvements:**
- Create LoggingConstants enum for shared subsystem string
- Prevent typos and ensure consistency across logging
- Derive cursor resource file name from cursorDimension constant
- Move cursor properties to top of setupCustomCursor() for easy modification

This ensures the code builds cleanly and follows Swift best practices
for maintainability and consistency.
@jsonify jsonify merged commit 656054d into main Nov 10, 2025
8 of 9 checks passed
@jsonify jsonify deleted the claude/code-review-suggestions-011CUzt3cniF5LUBa2jGNMyQ branch November 10, 2025 23:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants