feat: Chat ai setting #4619
feat: Chat ai setting #4619
Conversation
| hidden: (formValue) => { | ||
| return formValue.CHAT_AI_TYPE !== 'deep-seek' | ||
| } | ||
| }, | ||
| GPT_PROXY: { | ||
| } | ||
| }, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
The main differences between these two documents relate to updating the fields array within each object:
-
The first document does not contain an updated version of 'DEEPSEEK_MODEL' and its corresponding property name.
-
There is a typo where instead of
"VAULT_HCP_TOKEN"it should be"VAULT_HCPP_TOKEN". -
No changes have been made in the second version about "Chat AI enabled", although this field seems redundant given its inclusion at the bottom of the doclist section.
No optimization suggestion nor language model parameters change since there's no mention of different models or configurations beyond what is provided here. For more significant optimizations, adjustments might need to be done on the configuration files that include such settings rather than manually editing these .ts scripts.
| .message-content { | ||
| background-color: var(--menu-hover); | ||
| border-radius: 12px 2px 12px 12px; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
In conclusion, the main difference between old and new version of Vue component seems that it's using different style sheet for Avatar with v-if condition. Additionally, some HTML attributes seem not fully compatible across both versions like "data-" attribute vs class name, and CSS rule usage.
There may also be issues related to the implementation of loading spinner inside tooltip <el-tooltip> (if implemented).
Optimization:
- Consider moving common styles into shared components file
- Simplify repetitive code blocks
Potential improvements could include refactoring code logic where unnecessary parts are merged together. This can improve legibility and make it easier to manage similar functionality.
To achieve better performance, consider optimizing rendering times for complex elements through async rendering techniques or memoization strategies.
For security considerations, ensure sensitive information such as API keys is properly encapsulated or stored securely and accessible via secure channels only.
Please note that these guidelines will vary based on specific needs and constraints which we don't have access to here.
If you need further help covering other areas within your project, please do let us know!
|
|
||
| if (data.result.content !== '') { | ||
| chats[index].result.content = data.result.content | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Based on your provided changes, here are potential areas of improvement:
-
The
chatsarray appears to be missing from the mutation functionupdateChaMessageContentById. Please ensure it is not null or empty. -
Ensure that when updating new chat entries in
filterChats, you also check whether there's an existing entry with this id using.find()method instead of a hardcoded comparison against its properties. -
For consistency, please make sure all updates (
chats.forEach(element => ...)inside the loop) use the same method name likeforEach. -
You mentioned some modifications involving data retrieval based on ID but these were not fully implemented in your example; please confirm those lines should retrieve matching records first if they don't return the correct value, otherwise set default values appropriately in case no match exists.
-
In terms of optimization suggestions:
- Consider implementing ES7+ async await syntax for improved readability and robustness.
- Use destructuring directly within the spread operator:
{ message: { id } }. - Avoid mutating arrays outside of their initial state unless required (for instance, to change the order).
The code seems mostly OK now, expect minor improvements such as naming conventions, proper handling of undefined/null results etc.
| create_time: data.message.create_time | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| updateChaMessageContentById(data.message.id, newFragment) | ||
| } | ||
| if (data.message?.type === 'finish') { | ||
| setLoading(false) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is not a code snippet to compare and analyze. Please provide a specific piece of code you would like me to review here!
| .message-content { | ||
| background-color: var(--menu-hover); | ||
| border-radius: 12px 2px 12px 12px; | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
There doesn't appear to be significant discrepancies or errors in the provided VueJS template component code snippet. The changes seem minor stylistic enhancements like adjusting text sizes, altering styles for icons and components, and adding extra spacing. However, it would benefit from consistency across all elements for improved readability.
For instance, ensuring consistent styling choices across different elements such as colors, fonts, or layout adjustments could improve UX aesthetics and consistency. Also, some components have padding attributes that might not affect their visual layout but should be reviewed because they can impact rendering performance especially under high load scenarios on mobile devices or other environments where images may take up more memory due to loading animations etc...
It's recommended to thoroughly review your Vue templates with linting tools at least once per coding cycle so that issues of maintainability, clarity or efficiency become apparent early enough rather than during production deployment time which increases costs and complexity to resolve them.
The suggestions above do not apply to the JavaScript file section unless mentioned specific JavaScript logic needs optimization or bug fixings which are beyond my scope here.
|
|
||
| if (data.result.content !== '') { | ||
| chats[index].result.content = data.result.content | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } | ||
| } |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I recommend checking and possibly optimizing specific functions in each method to improve readability and maintainability of the code. Also consider adding more descriptive comments at the beginning or inside function bodies where needed.
| create_time: data.message.create_time | ||
| } | ||
|
|
||
| updateChaMessageContentById(data.message.id, newFragment) | ||
| } | ||
| if (data.message?.type === 'finish') { | ||
| setLoading(false) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
To identify any irregularities, issues, or optimizations related to your provided code difference checks between two parts of the conversation history, you'll need further specifics about those details. However, based on the given information:
This is an example of updating a fragment within a dialog with Redux Store state data. A loading flag might have been misconfigured or not accounted for properly; it's unclear without more context.
If one were performing this same function but considering asynchronous updates instead, they could consider using async/await along with promises. Alternatively, checking for consistency across APIs would be beneficial. But as stated earlier, these differences and improvements require specific knowledge about both sections being compared.
For optimization suggestions, remember that readability is key—it improves productivity for developers looking through large chunks of code. Consider reorganizing functions, breaking down complex logic into smaller steps or modules where appropriate, enhancing comment clarity, etc., depending on project requirements and complexity.
|
feat: Chat ai setting