Skip to content

Create SECURITY.md#2

Open
Fusionify-Digital wants to merge 1 commit intojundy779:mainfrom
Fusionify-Digital:patch-1
Open

Create SECURITY.md#2
Fusionify-Digital wants to merge 1 commit intojundy779:mainfrom
Fusionify-Digital:patch-1

Conversation

@Fusionify-Digital
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@Fusionify-Digital Fusionify-Digital commented Feb 11, 2026

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added security policy documentation outlining supported versions and their security support status, along with vulnerability reporting procedures and expected communication timelines.

@vercel
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

vercel bot commented Feb 11, 2026

@Fusionify-Digital is attempting to deploy a commit to the jundy779's projects Team on Vercel.

A member of the Team first needs to authorize it.

@coderabbitai
Copy link
Copy Markdown

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 11, 2026

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

A new SECURITY.md file has been added to document the project's security policy, including version support status and vulnerability reporting procedures. No functional code changes are included.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Security Policy Documentation
SECURITY.md
New file establishing security policy with supported versions table and vulnerability reporting guidance.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A security shield now stands so tall,
With versions tracked and policies for all,
Vulnerabilities shall have their say,
Through proper channels, come what may! 🛡️

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3
✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The pull request title accurately and directly describes the main change: creating a new SECURITY.md file with security policy guidance.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.

✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

Tip

Issue Planner is now in beta. Read the docs and try it out! Share your feedback on Discord.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Copy Markdown

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 3

🤖 Fix all issues with AI agents
In `@SECURITY.md`:
- Around line 17-21: Update the SECURITY.md "How to report a vulnerability"
placeholder by replacing the template text with concrete reporting instructions:
add a security contact (e.g., security@yourdomain.com or GitHub Security
Advisories), specify an expected response timeframe (e.g., 48–72 hours), outline
the vulnerability handling process (acknowledgement, triage, timeline for
remediation and public disclosure), and include any PGP key or secure
communication instructions if you support encrypted reports; also mention use of
GitHub's private vulnerability reporting if applicable.
- Around line 5-6: Remove the leftover template instruction text "Use this
section to tell people about which versions of your project are currently being
supported with security updates." from SECURITY.md; replace it with the actual
supported versions/supported policy or delete the placeholder paragraph entirely
so the file contains only finalized security policy content.
- Around line 8-13: The supported-versions table in SECURITY.md contains
placeholder versions; update it to reference the project's actual current
version from package.json (2.1.0) by replacing the rows (e.g., change "5.1.x" to
"2.1.x") and explicitly mark which versions receive security support (e.g., set
"2.1.x" to supported/checked, and set older versions like "2.0.x" and "<2.0" to
unsupported or as your support policy dictates); ensure the table header and
status icons remain intact so the SECURITY.md table accurately reflects security
support for version 2.1.0.

Comment on lines +5 to +6
Use this section to tell people about which versions of your project are
currently being supported with security updates.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟡 Minor

Remove template instructions.

These lines contain instructional text from the template that should be removed before finalizing the security policy.

📝 Suggested fix
-Use this section to tell people about which versions of your project are
-currently being supported with security updates.
-
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
Use this section to tell people about which versions of your project are
currently being supported with security updates.
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@SECURITY.md` around lines 5 - 6, Remove the leftover template instruction
text "Use this section to tell people about which versions of your project are
currently being supported with security updates." from SECURITY.md; replace it
with the actual supported versions/supported policy or delete the placeholder
paragraph entirely so the file contains only finalized security policy content.

Comment on lines +8 to +13
| Version | Supported |
| ------- | ------------------ |
| 5.1.x | :white_check_mark: |
| 5.0.x | :x: |
| 4.0.x | :white_check_mark: |
| < 4.0 | :x: |
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

🧩 Analysis chain

🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check for version configuration files
echo "=== Looking for version configuration files ==="
git ls-files | grep -E '(package\.json|setup\.py|pyproject\.toml|version\.py|__init__\.py|Cargo\.toml|pom\.xml|VERSION|_version\.py)$' | head -20

Repository: jundy779/FusionTik

Length of output: 122


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Check recent git tags
echo "=== Recent git tags ==="
git tag -l | sort -V | tail -20

Repository: jundy779/FusionTik

Length of output: 85


🏁 Script executed:

#!/bin/bash
# Search for version strings in the root and common locations
echo "=== Searching for version information ==="
rg -n "version" --max-count=5 -t json -t python -t toml . 2>/dev/null | head -30

Repository: jundy779/FusionTik

Length of output: 103


🏁 Script executed:

cat package.json

Repository: jundy779/FusionTik

Length of output: 2547


🏁 Script executed:

cat -n SECURITY.md

Repository: jundy779/FusionTik

Length of output: 827


Update the version numbers to match the actual project version 2.1.0.

The versions in the supported versions table (5.1.x, 5.0.x, 4.0.x, <4.0) are template placeholders that do not reflect the actual project version. The current version in package.json is 2.1.0. Replace these with accurate version numbers and define which versions receive security support.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@SECURITY.md` around lines 8 - 13, The supported-versions table in SECURITY.md
contains placeholder versions; update it to reference the project's actual
current version from package.json (2.1.0) by replacing the rows (e.g., change
"5.1.x" to "2.1.x") and explicitly mark which versions receive security support
(e.g., set "2.1.x" to supported/checked, and set older versions like "2.0.x" and
"<2.0" to unsupported or as your support policy dictates); ensure the table
header and status icons remain intact so the SECURITY.md table accurately
reflects security support for version 2.1.0.

Comment on lines +17 to +21
Use this section to tell people how to report a vulnerability.

Tell them where to go, how often they can expect to get an update on a
reported vulnerability, what to expect if the vulnerability is accepted or
declined, etc.
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Replace placeholder text with actual vulnerability reporting instructions.

This section contains only template placeholder text and provides no actionable information for reporting vulnerabilities. Please update it with:

  • A security contact email or reporting mechanism (e.g., security@domain.com, GitHub Security Advisories, or a security reporting platform)
  • Expected response timeframe
  • The vulnerability handling process
  • Any PGP keys or secure communication methods if applicable

Consider using GitHub's private vulnerability reporting feature if available, or provide a dedicated security email address.

🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In `@SECURITY.md` around lines 17 - 21, Update the SECURITY.md "How to report a
vulnerability" placeholder by replacing the template text with concrete
reporting instructions: add a security contact (e.g., security@yourdomain.com or
GitHub Security Advisories), specify an expected response timeframe (e.g., 48–72
hours), outline the vulnerability handling process (acknowledgement, triage,
timeline for remediation and public disclosure), and include any PGP key or
secure communication instructions if you support encrypted reports; also mention
use of GitHub's private vulnerability reporting if applicable.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant