Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Foundation of New Governance Model #98

Merged
merged 69 commits into from
Jul 19, 2021
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
69 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
ac72494
Update .gitignore
afshin Apr 16, 2021
902f6a4
Add software subprojects document.
afshin Apr 16, 2021
4bae166
Add list of subprojects document
afshin Apr 16, 2021
5423a50
Add SSC document
afshin Apr 16, 2021
421f7c1
Add bootstrapping document
afshin Apr 16, 2021
b53eb3f
BoD => Board of Directors
afshin Apr 18, 2021
d0b3425
Add ipython and ipykernel explicitly.
fperez Apr 30, 2021
7b02f68
Update software_subprojects.md
fperez Apr 30, 2021
792182b
Readability fixes.
fperez Apr 30, 2021
065c215
Add explicit mention of DEI working group
fperez Apr 30, 2021
e16f6dd
Add explicit note about Inclusion in the bootstrapping process.
fperez Apr 30, 2021
158cfd3
Include UX/Design & Enterprise
fperez Apr 30, 2021
5773a9b
Fix accidental change to IPython location.
fperez Apr 30, 2021
f19f9b4
Keep Binder & JupyterHub together
fperez Apr 30, 2021
ca02c44
Clarify JEP repo location.
fperez Apr 30, 2021
6b518ea
Update bootstrapping_decision_making.md
ellisonbg May 7, 2021
a31c2e7
Clarify JEP scope based on feedback.
fperez May 7, 2021
a2ab9aa
Tiny edit to gitignore, irrelevant to governance part.
fperez May 10, 2021
1d48203
CoC updates are sole responsibility of the BoD
fperez May 14, 2021
4a41ebf
Update 'may' to 'will'
fperez May 14, 2021
5c7674e
Nuking unnecessary paragraph as per @willingc feedback
fperez May 14, 2021
5a78a0d
Make Team Compass requirement explicit
fperez May 14, 2021
6ba35d2
Fix typo
fperez May 21, 2021
c8da86d
Edit language and process in bootstrap document to provide more clari…
jasongrout May 22, 2021
5ed49ba
Update bootstrapping_decision_making.md
afshin May 27, 2021
dd56049
Merge branch 'governance-spring' into bootstrapping
afshin May 27, 2021
944df73
Merge pull request #1 from jasongrout/bootstrapping
afshin May 27, 2021
174dc9d
Remove SSC document to open in separate PR.
afshin May 28, 2021
a435fc2
Clarify relationship of SSC to smaller, less-active subprojects.
fperez May 28, 2021
cd6b804
Fix typos.
fperez May 28, 2021
c7f48b2
Clarify "enterprise" term as per @choldgraf feedback
fperez May 28, 2021
d2ba2e0
Update list of subprojects
fperez May 28, 2021
792c71d
Add decision making guide.
afshin May 28, 2021
59c7731
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
5e160fd
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
577ad99
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
d4eb7d7
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
9d69c1e
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
5b987ee
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
9e01807
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
16debbc
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
d4527cc
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
efa44b6
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
2361915
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
581a786
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
a539ac5
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
13c374a
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
ba938c5
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
4b9504b
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
a6339db
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
ee88f8e
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 4, 2021
3334e0b
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
120ab68
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
9bccece
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
9985d99
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
42b1d82
Update bootstrapping_decision_making.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
94ae421
Update software_subprojects.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
04a90ad
Update software_subprojects.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
8bd0893
Update software_subprojects.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
e724508
Update list_of_subprojects.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
87ff16b
Update list_of_subprojects.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
a79129e
Update list_of_subprojects.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
03dfbfd
Update list_of_subprojects.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
8903830
Update list_of_subprojects.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
c5f8247
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
56ccd68
Update bootstrapping_decision_making.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
33e08f1
Update bootstrapping_decision_making.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
5500812
Update bootstrapping_decision_making.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
601e1d2
Update decision_making.md
afshin Jun 18, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
2 changes: 2 additions & 0 deletions bootstrapping_decision_making.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,3 +28,5 @@ This framework has the following characteristics:

- By gradually increasing the size of the decision making body one person at a time, the power implicit in this election process is gradually distributed over a larger group of people.
willingc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
- At each stage where the new decision making body is considering adding a new person, they can also choose to stop electing additional members. This allows the group to decide on the overall size in an organic, gradual manner.
- In the spirit of Jupyter always seeking to develop multi-stakeholder governance, this bootstrapping process should try to maximize the participation of individuals from multiple organizations. Specifically, they should when possible alternate across organizations to avoid all initial members of the decision making body belonging to a single organization.
willingc marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved
- As explained in the SSC document, there will be a working group with an SSC representative focused on issues of Inclusive Community Development. This representative can be a point of contact to assist with any issue regarding inclusion and participation in the creation of the project decision making bodies.
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I believe that this would be better as a standing working group of the board of directors. The chair of the working group will also have representation as a member of the SSC.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yup, that's actually the plan! Sorry if it wasn't too clear, but the BoD PR (that we'll try to open as soon as we complete work on this one) will list that as a necessary WG under the Board of Directors. I think in the end we could have chairs delegate representation to the SSC at their discretion, but that's a minor detail that can be worked later. I think your key point is one we're already in agreement on :)

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In my experience “diversity and inclusion” working groups are often marginalized within organizations. They exist as a token of D&I but do not have actual power to create change. What are ways that the Jupyter D&I group will have tangible authority over sub projects that do not meet Jupyter standards of D&I?