Skip to content

Conversation

@k0d13
Copy link
Owner

@k0d13 k0d13 commented Dec 12, 2025

This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.

Releases

[email protected]

Patch Changes

  • 02f578a: Bump patch supported range to 16.0.10

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Released version 2.1.10, updating the supported package range to 16.0.10.

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 12, 2025

Walkthrough

The pull request performs a patch release, bumping the package version from 2.1.9 to 2.1.10. The changeset entry is removed, the CHANGELOG is updated with the new version entry, and the package version is incremented. No functional code changes are introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Release metadata
.changeset/hmrquOpy4zVdN.md, CHANGELOG.md, package.json
Removed changeset entry, added version 2.1.10 to changelog with patch range update to 16.0.10, and bumped package version from 2.1.9 to 2.1.10

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

  • Simple version number increments and changelog updates with no logic changes
  • Straightforward release process with consistent, repetitive pattern across three files

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

dependencies, patches

Poem

🐰 A version bump hops along the way,
From 2.1.9 to 2.1.10 today!
The changeset whispers its final goodbye,
As the changelog sings a release lullaby.
Patch by patch, we steadily fly! 🚀

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Pending Releases' is vague and generic, lacking specific information about the actual changes being released or their purpose. Consider using a more descriptive title like 'Release next-ws 2.1.10' or 'Bump next-ws to 2.1.10 with updated patch range' to clearly indicate the version bump and purpose.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch changeset-release/main

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 02f578a and 564c2a5.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .changeset/hmrquOpy4zVdN.md (0 hunks)
  • CHANGELOG.md (1 hunks)
  • package.json (1 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .changeset/hmrquOpy4zVdN.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Testing
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (1)

3-3: Version bump to 2.1.10 is consistent with this release PR.
No concerns with the package version increment.

CHANGELOG.md (1)

3-8: Changelog entry for 2.1.10 looks consistent and correctly scoped.
Matches the described patch (“Bump patch supported range to 16.0.10”).


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@k0d13 k0d13 merged commit afd5e79 into main Dec 12, 2025
9 checks passed
@k0d13 k0d13 deleted the changeset-release/main branch December 12, 2025 02:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants