Skip to content

Conversation

@k0d13
Copy link
Owner

@k0d13 k0d13 commented Dec 23, 2025

This PR was opened by the Changesets release GitHub action. When you're ready to do a release, you can merge this and the packages will be published to npm automatically. If you're not ready to do a release yet, that's fine, whenever you add more changesets to main, this PR will be updated.

Releases

[email protected]

Patch Changes

  • 9bffbf4: Bump patch supported range to 16.1.1

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Bumped package version to 2.1.12
    • Updated changelog

✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Dec 23, 2025

Walkthrough

This PR removes a changeset entry and releases version 2.1.12 of the next-ws package with a single patch update bumping the supported patch range to 16.1.1, reflected in updated CHANGELOG.md and package.json version fields.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Release Patch
.changeset/1pGCCp4Ovpnq5.md, CHANGELOG.md, package.json
Removed changeset entry; added v2.1.12 changelog entry documenting patch for supported range bump; incremented package version from 2.1.11 to 2.1.12

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

patches

Poem

🐰 A tiny hop from one-one to one-two,
The patch notes say what we must do,
Version bumps like carrots grow,
Changelog records steal the show!
Hop along, the release is through! 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 inconclusive)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Title check ❓ Inconclusive The title 'Pending Releases' is vague and generic, using non-descriptive terminology that doesn't convey meaningful information about the specific package version bump or changeset. Consider using a more specific title such as 'Release [email protected]' or 'Release: Bump patch supported range to 16.1.1' to clearly indicate the package being released and the version number.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch changeset-release/main

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 9bffbf4 and bfd3e8c.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)
  • .changeset/1pGCCp4Ovpnq5.md
  • CHANGELOG.md
  • package.json
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • .changeset/1pGCCp4Ovpnq5.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (1)
  • GitHub Check: Testing
🔇 Additional comments (2)
package.json (1)

3-3: Version bump is consistent with release objectives.

The patch version has been correctly incremented from 2.1.11 to 2.1.12 to reflect the Next.js patch-supported range update to 16.1.1. No dependencies, exports, or other package metadata have been altered.

CHANGELOG.md (1)

3-8: Changelog entry is properly formatted and correctly positioned.

The new 2.1.12 section follows the established changelog conventions: version header, "Patch Changes" subsection, and commit reference with descriptive message. The entry is correctly placed before version 2.1.11, maintaining chronological order.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants