-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix testLogBug and changeSomeVariableName #6420
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Shane <[email protected]>
Friendly ping @wozniakjan @SpiritZhou @JorTurFer hope you to review and discuss, much thanks. |
var incomingSvGvkr GroupVersionKindResource | ||
incomingSvGvkr, err = ParseGVKR(restMapper, incomingSo.Spec.ScaleTargetRef.APIVersion, incomingSo.Spec.ScaleTargetRef.Kind) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why Sv instead of So?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
why Sv instead of So?
Because GVKR represents GroupVersionKindResource, and this is be seen more common and explicit.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, Gckr
vs Gvkr
is clear (and the change is 100% worth), but SO
means ScaledObject
, that's why my question
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah,
Gckr
vsGvkr
is clear (and the change is 100% worth), butSO
meansScaledObject
, that's why my question
Haha, an oolong,I have revised. Wait for your review. thanks
go.mod
Outdated
// https://avd.aquasec.com/nvd/cve-2024-45337 | ||
golang.org/x/crypto => golang.org/x/crypto v0.31.0 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd move this to another PR as it's to solve an issue by bumping deps
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'd move this to another PR as it's to solve an issue by bumping deps
ok
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've created this PR to bump the dependency as it has a critical CVE -> #6422
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I've created this PR to bump the dependency as it has a critical CVE -> #6422
I have revised here, maybe can directly merge this PR. Otherwise, I have to separate this PR.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please rebase your PR with main changes 🙏 sorry for this, I prefer to have an isolated PR to fix the CVE because it's a 9.1 that needs to be trackable IMHO
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
please rebase your PR with main changes 🙏 sorry for this, I prefer to have an isolated PR to fix the CVE because it's a 9.1 that needs to be trackable IMHO
make sense, both are all ok.
CHANGELOG.md
Outdated
@@ -75,6 +75,7 @@ Here is an overview of all new **experimental** features: | |||
|
|||
- **General**: Centralize and improve automaxprocs configuration with proper structured logging ([#5970](https://github.com/kedacore/keda/issues/5970)) | |||
- **General**: Paused ScaledObject count is reported correctly after operator restart ([#6321](https://github.com/kedacore/keda/issues/6321)) | |||
- **General**: Revise some variable names and wrong test log([#6420](https://github.com/kedacore/keda/pull/6420)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let' move this into Other section - as it is not user facing fix. Or we can even remove it from the changelog. I am okay with both.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Let' move this into Other section - as it is not user facing fix. Or we can even remove it from the changelog. I am okay with both.
ok
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
done, friendly ping @zroubalik @zroubalik , hope for your review, thank you.
Signed-off-by: Shane <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shane <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Shane <[email protected]>
8dd5470
to
f56c05b
Compare
done, friendly ping @zroubalik @zroubalik , hope for your review, thank you. |
/run-e2e internal |
Checklist
Fixes #
Relates to #