Create requirements-autofix.txt

[gitworkflows]

User description

Description

Please include a summary of the change and which issue is fixed. Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change.

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

Snapshots:

Include snapshots for easier review.

Checklist:

• [*] My code follows the style guidelines of this project
• I have already rebased the commits and make the commit message conform to the project standard.
• I have performed a self-review of my own code
• I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
• I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
• Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

---

PR Type

dependencies

---

Description

• Added a new requirements-autofix.txt file to manage dependencies.
• Included pre-commit with version constraints >=2.17.0,<4.0.0.
• Referenced lint-requirements.txt for additional dependencies.

---

Changes walkthrough 📝

	Relevant files
Dependencies	requirements-autofix.txt Add requirements-autofix.txt with pre-commit dependency    requirements/requirements-autofix.txt Added a new requirements file named requirements-autofix.txt. Included a reference to lint-requirements.txt. Specified pre-commit dependency with version constraints. +2/-0

---

💡 PR-Agent usage:
Comment /help on the PR to get a list of all available PR-Agent tools and their descriptions

[sourcery-ai]

🧙 Sourcery has finished reviewing your pull request!

---

Tips

• Trigger a new Sourcery review by commenting @sourcery-ai review on the pull request.
• Continue your discussion with Sourcery by replying directly to review comments.
• You can change your review settings at any time by accessing your dashboard:
  • Enable or disable the Sourcery-generated pull request summary or reviewer's guide;
  • Change the review language;
• You can always contact us if you have any questions or feedback.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ No key issues to review

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 1 🔵⚪⚪⚪⚪

🧪 No relevant tests

🔒 No security concerns identified

⚡ No key issues to review

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Maintainability	Add a descriptive comment to improve file documentation Consider adding a comment to explain the purpose of this requirements file and its relationship with lint-requirements.txt. requirements/requirements-autofix.txt [1-2] +# Requirements for auto-fixing linting issues -r lint-requirements.txt pre-commit >=2.17.0,<4.0.0 Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding a comment to explain the purpose of the requirements file and its relationship with lint-requirements.txt improves maintainability and helps future developers understand the context and purpose of the file.	8
Best practice	Pin the exact version of the dependency instead of using a version range Consider pinning the exact version of pre-commit to ensure consistent behavior across different environments. requirements/requirements-autofix.txt [2] -pre-commit >=2.17.0,<4.0.0 +pre-commit ==2.21.0 Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Pinning the exact version of pre-commit can ensure consistent behavior across different environments, which is a good practice for dependency management. However, it may reduce flexibility in receiving minor updates or patches.	7

💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

[codiumai-pr-agent-free]

PR Code Suggestions ✨

Category	Suggestion	Score
Maintainability	Add a descriptive comment to improve file documentation Consider adding a comment to explain the purpose of this requirements file and its relationship with lint-requirements.txt. requirements/requirements-autofix.txt [1-2] +# Requirements for auto-fixing linting issues -r lint-requirements.txt pre-commit >=2.17.0,<4.0.0 Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8 Why: Adding a comment to explain the purpose of the requirements file and its relationship with lint-requirements.txt improves maintainability and helps future developers understand the context and usage of the file.	8
Best practice	Pin the exact version of the dependency instead of using version ranges Consider pinning the exact version of pre-commit to ensure consistent behavior across different environments. requirements/requirements-autofix.txt [2] -pre-commit >=2.17.0,<4.0.0 +pre-commit ==2.21.0 Apply this suggestion Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7 Why: Pinning the exact version of pre-commit can ensure consistent behavior across different environments, which is a good practice for dependency management. However, it may reduce flexibility in updating to newer versions.	7

💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

[sourcery-ai]

Hey @gitworkflows - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!

Here's what I looked at during the review

• 🟢 General issues: all looks good
• 🟢 Security: all looks good
• 🟢 Testing: all looks good
• 🟢 Complexity: all looks good
• 🟢 Documentation: all looks good

---

Sourcery is free for open source - if you like our reviews please consider sharing them ✨

• X
• Mastodon
• LinkedIn
• Facebook

_{Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment to tell me if it was helpful.}

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: build (3.11)

Failed stage: Check Python code style [❌]

Failed test name: fmt-check

Failure summary: The action failed because the fmt-check target in the Makefile encountered an error. This likely indicates that the code formatting does not meet the required standards.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 861: gptdb/agent/resource/manage.py 862: gptdb/agent/resource/pack.py 863: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/pack.py 864: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/base.py 865: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/autogpt/plugins_util.py 866: gptdb/agent/util/api_call.py 867: gptdb/agent/util/llm/llm_client.py 868: gptdb/experimental/intent/base.py 869: make: *** [Makefile:56: fmt-check] Error 1 870: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2.

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: build (3.10)

Failed stage: Check Python code style [❌]

Failed test name: fmt-check

Failure summary: The action failed because the fmt-check target in the Makefile encountered an error. This suggests that there is a formatting issue in the codebase that does not comply with the expected code style.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 867: gptdb/agent/resource/manage.py 868: gptdb/agent/resource/pack.py 869: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/pack.py 870: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/base.py 871: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/autogpt/plugins_util.py 872: gptdb/agent/util/api_call.py 873: gptdb/agent/util/llm/llm_client.py 874: gptdb/experimental/intent/base.py 875: make: *** [Makefile:56: fmt-check] Error 1 876: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2.

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: build (3.11)

Failed stage: Check Python code style [❌]

Failed test name: fmt-check

Failure summary: The action failed because the fmt-check target in the Makefile encountered an error. This likely indicates that the code formatting does not meet the required standards.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 860: gptdb/agent/resource/manage.py 861: gptdb/agent/resource/pack.py 862: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/pack.py 863: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/base.py 864: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/autogpt/plugins_util.py 865: gptdb/agent/util/api_call.py 866: gptdb/agent/util/llm/llm_client.py 867: gptdb/experimental/intent/base.py 868: make: *** [Makefile:56: fmt-check] Error 1 869: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2.

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: build (3.10)

Failed stage: Check Python code style [❌]

Failure summary: The action failed because the fmt-check target in the Makefile encountered an error. This likely indicates that the code formatting does not meet the required standards or conventions specified in the project.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 867: gptdb/agent/resource/manage.py 868: gptdb/agent/resource/pack.py 869: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/pack.py 870: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/base.py 871: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/autogpt/plugins_util.py 872: gptdb/agent/util/api_call.py 873: gptdb/agent/util/llm/llm_client.py 874: gptdb/experimental/intent/base.py 875: make: *** [Makefile:56: fmt-check] Error 1 876: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2.

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: build (3.10)

Failed stage: Check Python code style [❌]

Failed test name: ""

Failure summary: The action failed because the fmt-check target in the Makefile encountered an error. This likely indicates that there are formatting issues in the code that do not comply with the required style guidelines.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 867: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/autogpt/plugins_util.py 868: gptdb/agent/core/base_agent.py 869: gptdb/agent/core/agent_manage.py 870: gptdb/agent/core/memory/agent_memory.py 871: gptdb/agent/core/memory/short_term.py 872: gptdb/agent/core/memory/long_term.py 873: gptdb/agent/core/memory/gpts/gpts_memory.py 874: gptdb/experimental/intent/base.py 875: make: *** [Makefile:56: fmt-check] Error 1 876: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2.

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: build (3.10)

Failed stage: Check Python code style [❌]

Failed test name: fmt-check

Failure summary: The action failed because the fmt-check target in the Makefile encountered an error. This likely indicates that the code formatting did not meet the required standards or rules specified in the Makefile.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 867: gptdb/agent/resource/manage.py 868: gptdb/agent/resource/pack.py 869: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/pack.py 870: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/base.py 871: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/autogpt/plugins_util.py 872: gptdb/agent/util/api_call.py 873: gptdb/agent/util/llm/llm_client.py 874: gptdb/experimental/intent/base.py 875: make: *** [Makefile:56: fmt-check] Error 1 876: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2.

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.

[codiumai-pr-agent-pro]

PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

CI Failure Feedback 🧐

Action: build (3.11)

Failed stage: Check Python code style [❌]

Failed test name: fmt-check

Failure summary: The action failed because the fmt-check target in the Makefile encountered an error. This likely indicates that there are formatting issues in the code files listed before the error message.

Relevant error logs: 1: ##[group]Operating System 2: Ubuntu ... 861: gptdb/agent/resource/manage.py 862: gptdb/agent/resource/pack.py 863: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/pack.py 864: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/base.py 865: gptdb/agent/resource/tool/autogpt/plugins_util.py 866: gptdb/agent/util/api_call.py 867: gptdb/agent/util/llm/llm_client.py 868: gptdb/experimental/intent/base.py 869: make: *** [Makefile:56: fmt-check] Error 1 870: ##[error]Process completed with exit code 2.

---

✨ CI feedback usage guide:

---

The CI feedback tool (/checks) automatically triggers when a PR has a failed check.
The tool analyzes the failed checks and provides several feedbacks:

• Failed stage
• Failed test name
• Failure summary
• Relevant error logs

In addition to being automatically triggered, the tool can also be invoked manually by commenting on a PR:

/checks "https://github.com/{repo_name}/actions/runs/{run_number}/job/{job_number}"

where {repo_name} is the name of the repository, {run_number} is the run number of the failed check, and {job_number} is the job number of the failed check.

Configuration options

• enable_auto_checks_feedback - if set to true, the tool will automatically provide feedback when a check is failed. Default is true.
• excluded_checks_list - a list of checks to exclude from the feedback, for example: ["check1", "check2"]. Default is an empty list.
• enable_help_text - if set to true, the tool will provide a help message with the feedback. Default is true.
• persistent_comment - if set to true, the tool will overwrite a previous checks comment with the new feedback. Default is true.
• final_update_message - if persistent_comment is true and updating a previous checks message, the tool will also create a new message: "Persistent checks updated to latest commit". Default is true.

See more information about the checks tool in the docs.