Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Code Review: tik/proxy-view #129

Merged
merged 49 commits into from
Sep 1, 2023
Merged

Code Review: tik/proxy-view #129

merged 49 commits into from
Sep 1, 2023

Conversation

fight4day
Copy link
Contributor

@fight4day fight4day commented Jul 4, 2022

@fight4day fight4day requested a review from Eddykasp July 4, 2022 12:00
Copy link
Contributor

@Eddykasp Eddykasp left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Another idea that could be interesting, but may be a bit out of scope or too complicated technically, would be the ability to control the values used for numerical filters from the UI. So that the rule would only define the tag and a variable to check against, and the actual value for that variable can then be set in the UI via a slider.

@Eddykasp
Copy link
Contributor

javadoc doesn't like the doc comments in some of these files

Copy link
Member

@NiklasRentzCAU NiklasRentzCAU left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM now. This can be merged even if the corresponding klighd-vscode PR is not ready yet, as this will not break anything.

@Eddykasp Eddykasp merged commit 1cc5c06 into master Sep 1, 2023
3 checks passed
@NiklasRentzCAU NiklasRentzCAU deleted the tik/proxy-view branch August 7, 2024 13:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants