This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
Add an additional mirror for sv_pure_bypass_6
- Loading branch information
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
in some maps like vertigo we cant see t side models ,in cache,d2 and infy we cawnnot see ct side models ....any solution for this ?
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, there is a solution. Figure out a new exploit.
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I laugh at how people treat this like a free exploit support service.
However I really appreciate the efforts of the team to find and properly document those exploits.
I do have the feeling the sv_pure exploits get fixed rather quickly especially for Valve standards.
So this repo does seem to have a noticeably positive effect.
If anyone at Valve is reading: Stop just patching each exploit one by one as it is posted here and get your shit together. 90% if not all of this stuff here could have been avoided from the get go if you would actually adhere to secure coding standards and had a proper release management instead of everyone just shitting code into a bucket as they please and then wrapping it up with nice skins and a lot of duck tape.
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Generally, there are lots of people who just open issues on open source projects and they want you to solve their task for free. Well, this is no StackOverflow :P
Thanks! The mods at r/GlobalOffensive have potates instead of brains. They aren't able to figure out that the more people know, the faster it will be fixed. @kkthxbye-code linked to this repo and the comment got removed.
Well, I don't think really care unless it gets really popular. The potatoes at r/GlobalOffensive suggest opening issues on the official CSGO repo and emailing them. They also aren't able to acknowledge that @kkthxbye-code reported the model exploit both through the repo and through the email and got no response. It got fixed about two years later. TBH, IMO if @kkthxbye-code linked to the issue in the subreddit it would be also removed because it would show how to "cheat". LOL.
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
u can see all modles all maps it depends on th skins they wear 👍
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
faceit fixed on my smurf it detects after a while:) not playing obviouse just to cheack
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I hope you enjoy your bans :)
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
im only helping:) i dont use it on my main:)
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kkthxbye-code From what I read from internet , we can change the file and still remain the same crc32 hash. This works for md5 too. If we find a way to remain both md5 and crc32 hashes same, we can cause sv_pure to think that the files aren't changed.
Edit: I realized, it is nearly impossible.
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@eren-erver
It's not feasible creating md5 collisions.
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
can you reup pak01_008.vpk on bypass5?
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@kkthxbye-code I think it is possible https://natmchugh.blogspot.com/2015/02/create-your-own-md5-collisions.html
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Feel free to try, I would love to see it possible. The pak files are chunked, then hashed. Dealing with random data in there to generate a collision is probably not feasible in my opinion.
Also, be aware that what you linked is a chosen prefix attack, which further limits the usability.
c1c7af1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Done.