Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 26, 2024. It is now read-only.

Commit

Permalink
Add an additional mirror for sv_pure_bypass_6
Browse files Browse the repository at this point in the history
  • Loading branch information
szmarczak authored Aug 27, 2020
1 parent c14039c commit c1c7af1
Showing 1 changed file with 1 addition and 1 deletion.
2 changes: 1 addition & 1 deletion sv_pure_bypass_6/README.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ The vpk dirs are loaded before file hashing is disabled. You can still change al

This exploit provides a sv_pure and VAC-safe wallhack. Always assume that services with own client (Faceit, ESEA) detects exploits like these.

1. Download the [required files](https://gofile.io/d/yc7Ctv).
1. Download the required files: [mirror 1 (fromsmash.com)](https://fromsmash.com/g1d0XFebf6-dt) | [mirror 2 (gofile.io)](https://gofile.io/d/yc7Ctv).
2. Unzip all vpks in the csgo folder, replacing any existing files.
3. Change the `gameinfo.txt` file as specified in the previous section.
4. Start the game and play on any offical or third-party server.
Expand Down

14 comments on commit c1c7af1

@remains123
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in some maps like vertigo we cant see t side models ,in cache,d2 and infy we cawnnot see ct side models ....any solution for this ?

@szmarczak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, there is a solution. Figure out a new exploit.

@DPTJKKVH
Copy link

@DPTJKKVH DPTJKKVH commented on c1c7af1 Aug 29, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I laugh at how people treat this like a free exploit support service.

However I really appreciate the efforts of the team to find and properly document those exploits.

I do have the feeling the sv_pure exploits get fixed rather quickly especially for Valve standards.

So this repo does seem to have a noticeably positive effect.

If anyone at Valve is reading: Stop just patching each exploit one by one as it is posted here and get your shit together. 90% if not all of this stuff here could have been avoided from the get go if you would actually adhere to secure coding standards and had a proper release management instead of everyone just shitting code into a bucket as they please and then wrapping it up with nice skins and a lot of duck tape.

@szmarczak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I laugh at how people treat this like a free exploit support service.

Generally, there are lots of people who just open issues on open source projects and they want you to solve their task for free. Well, this is no StackOverflow :P

However I really appreciate the efforts of the team to find and properly document those exploits.

Thanks! The mods at r/GlobalOffensive have potates instead of brains. They aren't able to figure out that the more people know, the faster it will be fixed. @kkthxbye-code linked to this repo and the comment got removed.

If anyone at Valve is reading

Well, I don't think really care unless it gets really popular. The potatoes at r/GlobalOffensive suggest opening issues on the official CSGO repo and emailing them. They also aren't able to acknowledge that @kkthxbye-code reported the model exploit both through the repo and through the email and got no response. It got fixed about two years later. TBH, IMO if @kkthxbye-code linked to the issue in the subreddit it would be also removed because it would show how to "cheat". LOL.

@janczy00
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

u can see all modles all maps it depends on th skins they wear 👍

@janczy00
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

faceit fixed on my smurf it detects after a while:) not playing obviouse just to cheack

@AnAkkk
Copy link

@AnAkkk AnAkkk commented on c1c7af1 Sep 1, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

faceit fixed on my smurf it detects after a while:) not playing obviouse just to cheack

I hope you enjoy your bans :)

@janczy00
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

faceit fixed on my smurf it detects after a while:) not playing obviouse just to cheack

I hope you enjoy your bans :)

im only helping:) i dont use it on my main:)

@eren-erver
Copy link

@eren-erver eren-erver commented on c1c7af1 Sep 2, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kkthxbye-code From what I read from internet , we can change the file and still remain the same crc32 hash. This works for md5 too. If we find a way to remain both md5 and crc32 hashes same, we can cause sv_pure to think that the files aren't changed.

Edit: I realized, it is nearly impossible.

@kkthxbye-code
Copy link
Owner

@kkthxbye-code kkthxbye-code commented on c1c7af1 Sep 2, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eren-erver

It's not feasible creating md5 collisions.

@isleo168
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@eren-erver

It's not feasible creating md5 collisions.

can you reup pak01_008.vpk on bypass5?

@eren-erver
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kkthxbye-code
Copy link
Owner

@kkthxbye-code kkthxbye-code commented on c1c7af1 Sep 2, 2020

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kkthxbye-code I think it is possible https://natmchugh.blogspot.com/2015/02/create-your-own-md5-collisions.html

Feel free to try, I would love to see it possible. The pak files are chunked, then hashed. Dealing with random data in there to generate a collision is probably not feasible in my opinion.

Also, be aware that what you linked is a chosen prefix attack, which further limits the usability.

@szmarczak
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

can you reup pak01_008.vpk on bypass5?

Done.

Please sign in to comment.