Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactor: Improve Test Suite #127

Open
wants to merge 8 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Refactor: Improve Test Suite #127

wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

AlanAlvarez21
Copy link
Collaborator

@AlanAlvarez21 AlanAlvarez21 commented Jan 30, 2025

Refactor: Improve Test Suite Efficiency and Clarity
This pull request refactors several tests to improve efficiency, readability, and maintainability, key changes include:

  • Add missing notion tests.

  • Add missing utils tests.

  • Google SendEmail Test
    Memory Efficiency: Replaced @params instance variables with let declarations for improved memory management.
    Isolation: Stubbed API dependencies (GmailService, UserRefreshCredentials) to prevent actual API calls during testing.
    Clarity: Added structured context blocks to clearly separate success and failure scenarios, enhancing readability and understanding of test cases.

  • Notion Request Test Isolation
    Mocked HTTP requests using HTTParty to avoid external network dependencies during testing.
    Readability: Extracted headers logic into let(:expected_headers) for cleaner and more readable assertions.
    Structure: Improved structure within .execute and .notion_headers tests for better organization and clarity.

  • Notion UpdateDbState Test
    Performance: Refactored @DaTa instance variables to let(:data) for lazy loading, resulting in better test performance.
    Readability: Extracted expected request parameters to improve the clarity of assertions within .build_params.

  • OpenAI RunAssistant Test
    Isolation: Mocked HTTP requests to prevent actual interactions with the OpenAI API.
    Comprehensive Testing: Implemented different mocked responses for success, failure, and in-progress API calls to ensure robust handling of various scenarios.
    Error Handling: Verified that .execute handles API failures gracefully.

  • Discord Integration Test
    Memory Efficiency: Replaced @params instance variables with let(:params).
    Isolation: Ensured that the HTTP request mock effectively prevents external calls.
    Maintainability: Separated logic for request body and headers to improve maintainability and readability.

@AlanAlvarez21 AlanAlvarez21 force-pushed the refactor-tests branch 3 times, most recently from 2c33e70 to 825b2b1 Compare January 30, 2025 20:04
@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Jan 30, 2025

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 13082793630

Details

  • 333 of 333 (100.0%) changed or added relevant lines in 16 files are covered.
  • No unchanged relevant lines lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage remained the same at 100.0%

Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 13021438176: 0.0%
Covered Lines: 960
Relevant Lines: 960

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Collaborator

@FelipeGuzmanSierra FelipeGuzmanSierra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Everything looks good, I left a few comments, please, let me know if you want to discuss them! 🚀

spec/bas/utils/discord/request_spec.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/bas/utils/discord/request_spec.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/bas/utils/discord/request_spec.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/bas/utils/exceptions/request_spec.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/bas/utils/imap/request_spec.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
spec/bas/utils/openai/run_assistan_spec.rb Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@AlanAlvarez21
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Everything looks good, I left a few comments, please, let me know if you want to discuss them! 🚀

Ready, comments fixed, thanks @FelipeGuzmanSierra

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants