Skip to content

Conversation

@axe312ger
Copy link

@axe312ger axe312ger commented Nov 19, 2025

Found this broken link, it bleeds onto the mastra.ai website. Pls merge :)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Updated the Mastra Documentation link to reflect the current URL structure.

@coderabbitai
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 19, 2025

Walkthrough

Updated the Mastra documentation link in the README from https://docs.mastra.ai to https://mastra.ai/docs. This is a cosmetic change to a resource reference with no functional impact.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Documentation URL Update
README.md
Updated Mastra documentation link in the "Learn More" section from https://docs.mastra.ai to https://mastra.ai/docs

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~2 minutes

Poem

🐰 A link refreshed, a path now clear and bright,
From docs to mastra.ai, our waymark points right,
With whiskers twitching, we hop into the light! 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title 'fix: link to mastra docs' directly relates to the main change: updating a broken documentation link in README.md from https://docs.mastra.ai to https://mastra.ai/docs.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 124aa7f and edba638.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
README.md (1)

264-264: Link fix verified and approved.

The updated URL to https://mastra.ai/docs correctly points to the official Mastra documentation, resolving the broken link issue mentioned in the PR.

Tip

📝 Customizable high-level summaries are now available in beta!

You can now customize how CodeRabbit generates the high-level summary in your pull requests — including its content, structure, tone, and formatting.

  • Provide your own instructions using the high_level_summary_instructions setting.
  • Format the summary however you like (bullet lists, tables, multi-section layouts, contributor stats, etc.).
  • Use high_level_summary_in_walkthrough to move the summary from the description to the walkthrough section.

Example instruction:

"Divide the high-level summary into five sections:

  1. 📝 Description — Summarize the main change in 50–60 words, explaining what was done.
  2. 📓 References — List relevant issues, discussions, documentation, or related PRs.
  3. 📦 Dependencies & Requirements — Mention any new/updated dependencies, environment variable changes, or configuration updates.
  4. 📊 Contributor Summary — Include a Markdown table showing contributions:
    | Contributor | Lines Added | Lines Removed | Files Changed |
  5. ✔️ Additional Notes — Add any extra reviewer context.
    Keep each section concise (under 200 words) and use bullet or numbered lists for clarity."

Note: This feature is currently in beta for Pro-tier users, and pricing will be announced later.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant