enable codespell via github workflow, and corresponding typo fixes.

[fujitatomoya]

closes #230

[kubeedge-bot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
To complete the pull request process, please assign hongbingzhang after the PR has been reviewed.
You can assign the PR to them by writing /assign @hongbingzhang in a comment when ready.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[gemini-code-assist]

Summary of Changes

Hello @fujitatomoya, I'm Gemini Code Assist¹! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request significantly improves the overall quality and consistency of the repository's textual content by integrating codespell, an automated spell-checking tool. The changes include setting up the codespell workflow and applying an initial round of fixes for various spelling mistakes found in documentation, proposals, and configuration files. This initiative aims to maintain a high standard of written communication within the project.

Highlights

• Codespell Integration: Introduced codespell into the repository via a new GitHub workflow to automate the detection of common spelling errors.
• Typo Corrections: Addressed and fixed numerous typos identified by codespell across various documentation and configuration files, enhancing content accuracy.
• Configuration Files Added: Added codespell.cfg to configure codespell's behavior, including built-in dictionaries, skip patterns, and custom dictionary paths, along with codespell_whitelist.txt for specific ignored words.

Ignored Files

• Ignored by pattern: .github/workflows/** (1)
  • .github/workflows/codespell.yml

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature	Command	Description
Code Review	/gemini review	Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary	/gemini summary	Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment	@gemini-code-assist	Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help	/gemini help	Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

[gemini-code-assist]

Code Review

This pull request introduces codespell to the project's workflow and applies numerous typo fixes across various documentation and configuration files. This is a valuable addition for maintaining code and documentation quality. My review focuses on enhancing the codespell configuration for better coverage and points out a few remaining typos and grammatical errors that were missed during the initial sweep.

[fujitatomoya]

i am not sure why github workflow is started, is there any specific repo setting that disables the workflows?