Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: allow custom kwok instance-types at runtime #1847

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alec-rabold
Copy link

@alec-rabold alec-rabold commented Nov 27, 2024

Description

Implements #1848

Adds a new flag and environment variable to the KWOK cloud-provider to provide a way to use custom instance-types at runtime (currently requires recompiling). The main use-case is not having to maintain a unique image for each combination of instance-types.

Included some boiler-plate for options; can remove if preferred

How was this change tested?

Locally tested with default and custom instance-types


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Nov 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Nov 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @alec-rabold. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. label Nov 27, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 27, 2024
@alec-rabold alec-rabold force-pushed the feature/kwok/custom-instance-types branch from a1ea0e0 to 36c0872 Compare November 27, 2024 07:36
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/L Denotes a PR that changes 100-499 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Nov 27, 2024
@coveralls
Copy link

Pull Request Test Coverage Report for Build 12045581115

Details

  • 0 of 0 changed or added relevant lines in 0 files are covered.
  • 2 unchanged lines in 1 file lost coverage.
  • Overall coverage increased (+0.02%) to 80.863%

Files with Coverage Reduction New Missed Lines %
pkg/test/expectations/expectations.go 2 94.73%
Totals Coverage Status
Change from base Build 12037226338: 0.02%
Covered Lines: 8903
Relevant Lines: 11010

💛 - Coveralls

Copy link
Member

@jonathan-innis jonathan-innis left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Dec 10, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: alec-rabold, jonathan-innis

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Dec 10, 2024
@jonathan-innis
Copy link
Member

/hold

Looking for review from @njtran as well

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Dec 10, 2024
@jonathan-innis
Copy link
Member

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 10, 2024
@engedaam
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @njtran

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants