MTV-1852: Adding a Cold & Warm migration section

[anarnold97]

JIRA

• MTV-1852

PREVIEW

• 2.1. MTV cold migration and warm migration introduction

• 2.2.3. Advantages and disadvantages of cold and warm migrations

[anarnold97]

@dgur , @fabiand , @mnecas - here is the first draft for MTV-1852 Add Cold VS Warm migration Section into the MTV docs.

Please could you review and suggest any further content and any changes?

Please could I also as for some help improving this image:

I think a detailed infographic comparing the workflows of cold and warm migration would really help, but I am unsure where to begin. Even a rough napkin draft would be great as I can easily tidy it.

Thanks

[dgur]

@anarnold97 thank you for the quick progress with this task!
I request you to pause a bit, as the team needs to update the slides with a couple of the latest Warm Migration updates found in the latest MTV 2.7

We, (Mordechai and David) Will update you and explain the changes.
Then I suggest instead of creating new separate section for it "2.7. MTV cold migration and warm migration introduction"
We work together to combine the latest s updates into the existing section "[1.1.3. Advantages and disadvantages of cold and warm migrations]

Mainly focusing on updating the comparison Table and the conclusion - when to use what.

[dgur]

new table Table "2.1. Cold and warm migration compared" overlaps with tables at "2.2.3. Advantages and disadvantages of cold and warm migrations"
I believe all those needs to be combined to one under 2.2.3

[duduvaa]

@anarnold97 ,
table 2.1 , warm , VM downtime
The VM is shutdown during the cutover step as described in slide 4

[dgur]

new table Table "2.1. Cold and warm migration compared" overlaps with tables at "2.2.3. Advantages and disadvantages of cold and warm migrations" I believe all those needs to be combined to one under 2.2.3

Do we have an updated preview of it?

[anarnold97]

@dgur && @duduvaa - PR and Preview updated

[duduvaa]

LGTM

[dgur]

We have "Parallelism" in Table 2.1. and also the same in Table 2.2.
I Suggest to combine the 2 tables to one big table - aka combine section 2.2.3.1 and 2.2.3.2

[anarnold97]

@dgur - all three tables merged into one

However, the preview is hitting RH security, so I have deleted the preview until i have time to set up as a false positive. Please review the PR, the table is as follows

With the following taxonomy

Sorry for the rush but I need to get this pushed to merge as soon as possible, as we have other releases early next week that we need to work on

Thanks