Skip to content

Conversation

@YaelDillies
Copy link
Collaborator


Open in Gitpod

@github-actions github-actions bot added the t-data Data (lists, quotients, numbers, etc) label Dec 9, 2025
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Dec 9, 2025

PR summary ba422618a7

Import changes for modified files

No significant changes to the import graph

Import changes for all files
Files Import difference

Declarations diff

+ SurjOn.surjective

You can run this locally as follows
## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>

## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>

The doc-module for script/declarations_diff.sh contains some details about this script.


No changes to technical debt.

You can run this locally as

./scripts/technical-debt-metrics.sh pr_summary
  • The relative value is the weighted sum of the differences with weight given by the inverse of the current value of the statistic.
  • The absolute value is the relative value divided by the total sum of the inverses of the current values (i.e. the weighted average of the differences).

@YaelDillies YaelDillies changed the title feat(Data/Set): a function surjective on a set is surjective feat(Data/Set): a function surjective on univ is surjective Dec 10, 2025
Copy link
Collaborator

@j-loreaux j-loreaux left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I was surprised we didn't have this, but Loogle tells me we don't, so:

bors merge

@mathlib-bors
Copy link
Contributor

mathlib-bors bot commented Dec 10, 2025

Pull request successfully merged into master.

Build succeeded:

@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot changed the title feat(Data/Set): a function surjective on univ is surjective [Merged by Bors] - feat(Data/Set): a function surjective on univ is surjective Dec 10, 2025
@mathlib-bors mathlib-bors bot closed this Dec 10, 2025
@YaelDillies YaelDillies deleted the surj_on_surjective branch December 10, 2025 19:54
@YaelDillies
Copy link
Collaborator Author

I was surprised we didn't have this, but Loogle tells me we don't

Formalisation is a game of driving on potholes 😀

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ready-to-merge This PR has been sent to bors. t-data Data (lists, quotients, numbers, etc)

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants