Skip to content

Conversation

MH4GF
Copy link
Member

@MH4GF MH4GF commented Oct 8, 2025

Summary

Add comprehensive LangSmith integration to schema-bench for advanced evaluation tracking, visualization, and experiment comparison.

Key Features

  • 📊 LangSmith dataset upload from local workspace files
  • 🚀 Evaluation execution with LiamDB and OpenAI executors
  • 📈 Schema metrics tracking (table/column counts, F1 scores, recall)
  • ⚙️ Configurable repetitions and concurrency
  • 🛡️ Type-safe error handling with neverthrow

Implementation Details

New Files

  • evaluateWithLangsmith.ts - CLI for running evaluations against LangSmith datasets
  • uploadDatasetToLangsmith.ts - CLI for uploading/updating LangSmith datasets
  • schemaEvaluator.ts - Custom evaluator for schema similarity metrics
  • loadJsonFiles.ts - Shared utility for consistent JSON file loading with validation

Key Technical Decisions

  1. Neverthrow Integration: Added @liam-hq/neverthrow for functional error handling

    • Used ResultAsync.combine for parallel async operations
    • Used orElse for fallback logic (get or create dataset)
  2. Valibot Validation: Schema-based CLI argument parsing with default values

    • Runtime type validation for all external data
    • Type inference with v.InferOutput to eliminate manual type definitions
  3. Code Reuse: Extracted loadJsonFiles utility to avoid duplication

    • Generic function supporting both input and reference files
    • Consistent error handling across the codebase

Usage

Setup

export LANGSMITH_API_KEY="your-api-key"
pnpm --filter @liam-hq/schema-bench langsmith:upload -all

Run Evaluation

# LiamDB
pnpm --filter @liam-hq/schema-bench langsmith -default --liamdb

# OpenAI with custom options
pnpm --filter @liam-hq/schema-bench langsmith -default --openai --num-repetitions=5

Test Plan

  • Lint checks pass
  • TypeScript compilation succeeds
  • Test dataset upload to LangSmith
  • Test evaluation execution with LiamDB
  • Test evaluation execution with OpenAI
  • Verify metrics are correctly calculated and displayed

🤖 Generated with Claude Code

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • LangSmith integration: CLI commands to upload datasets and run schema evaluations using LiamDB or OpenAI executors with configurable repetitions and concurrency.
    • Schema evaluator provides table/column metrics (counts, F1, recall, correctness rates).
  • Documentation

    • README section: setup, uploading datasets, running evaluations, flags/examples, and viewing results.
  • Chores

    • Added a workspace dependency for result handling and npm scripts to run LangSmith workflows.

Copy link

changeset-bot bot commented Oct 8, 2025

⚠️ No Changeset found

Latest commit: 8852d25

Merging this PR will not cause a version bump for any packages. If these changes should not result in a new version, you're good to go. If these changes should result in a version bump, you need to add a changeset.

This PR includes no changesets

When changesets are added to this PR, you'll see the packages that this PR includes changesets for and the associated semver types

Click here to learn what changesets are, and how to add one.

Click here if you're a maintainer who wants to add a changeset to this PR

Copy link

vercel bot commented Oct 8, 2025

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
liam-app Ready Ready Preview Comment Oct 9, 2025 10:02am
liam-assets Ready Ready Preview Comment Oct 9, 2025 10:02am
liam-storybook Ready Ready Preview Comment Oct 9, 2025 10:02am
2 Skipped Deployments
Project Deployment Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
liam-docs Ignored Ignored Preview Oct 9, 2025 10:02am
liam-erd-sample Skipped Skipped Oct 9, 2025 10:02am

Copy link

supabase bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Updates to Preview Branch (feat/langsmith-integration) ↗︎

Deployments Status Updated
Database Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:57:31 UTC
Services Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:57:31 UTC
APIs Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:57:31 UTC

Tasks are run on every commit but only new migration files are pushed.
Close and reopen this PR if you want to apply changes from existing seed or migration files.

Tasks Status Updated
Configurations Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:57:31 UTC
Migrations Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:57:33 UTC
Seeding Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:57:33 UTC
Edge Functions Thu, 09 Oct 2025 09:57:33 UTC

View logs for this Workflow Run ↗︎.
Learn more about Supabase for Git ↗︎.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 8, 2025

Note

Other AI code review bot(s) detected

CodeRabbit has detected other AI code review bot(s) in this pull request and will avoid duplicating their findings in the review comments. This may lead to a less comprehensive review.

Walkthrough

Adds LangSmith integration to schema-bench: new CLI scripts to upload datasets and run evaluations, a LangSmith evaluator and types, package.json scripts/dependency updates, and a refactor of JSON-loading utilities and executor call sites to use a generalized loader and renamed data field. (50 words)

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Docs: LangSmith usage
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/README.md
Adds LangSmith Setup, Running Evaluations, Viewing Results and documents new CLI commands and flags.
Package metadata & scripts
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/package.json
Adds dependency @liam-hq/neverthrow and npm scripts langsmith and langsmith:upload.
LangSmith CLI: evaluate
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts
New CLI to run evaluations via LangSmith; parses executors/options, resolves datasets, runs evaluations (liamdb/openai), and handles errors using ResultAsync patterns.
LangSmith CLI: upload
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/uploadDatasetToLangsmith.ts
New CLI to upload/update examples to LangSmith from execution/input and execution/reference; validates JSON and upserts examples per case.
Executors: input refactor
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeLiamDbShared.ts, frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts
Switches to loadJsonFiles, reads from execution/input, renames per-case field inputdata, updates call sites, and adjusts path imports.
Utils: loader rename/export
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/index.ts, frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts
Replaces loadInputFiles export with loadJsonFiles(directory); returns { caseId, data }, updates error messages and directory semantics.
LangSmith evaluation/types
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts, frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/types.ts
Adds schemaEvaluator: EvaluatorT producing table/column counts and F1/recall metrics; adds LangSmithInput, LangSmithOutput, and LangSmithDatasetConfig types.

Sequence Diagram(s)

sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  actor Dev as Developer
  participant CLI as evaluateWithLangsmith CLI
  participant Utils as Dataset Utils
  participant Exec as Executor (LiamDB/OpenAI)
  participant LS as LangSmith
  participant Eval as schemaEvaluator

  Dev->>CLI: Run "pnpm schema-bench langsmith --liamdb|--openai ..."
  CLI->>CLI: Parse flags (num-repetitions, max-concurrency)
  CLI->>Utils: Resolve workspace & select datasets
  Utils-->>CLI: Dataset list
  loop per dataset (concurrent)
    CLI->>Exec: Execute(case.data)
    Exec-->>CLI: Output schema
    CLI->>LS: Upload run + outputs
    LS->>Eval: Evaluate(reference, output)
    Eval-->>LS: Return metrics
    LS-->>CLI: Store run & metrics
  end
  CLI-->>Dev: Exit (success/failure)
Loading
sequenceDiagram
  autonumber
  actor Dev as Developer
  participant UCLI as uploadDatasetToLangsmith CLI
  participant FS as Filesystem
  participant LS as LangSmith

  Dev->>UCLI: Run "pnpm schema-bench langsmith:upload --datasets ..."
  UCLI->>FS: Read `execution/input` (loadJsonFiles)
  UCLI->>FS: Read `execution/reference` (loadJsonFiles)
  UCLI->>UCLI: Validate inputs & references
  UCLI->>LS: Get or create dataset
  loop For each caseId
    alt reference exists
      UCLI->>LS: Create or update example (input + reference)
      LS-->>UCLI: Example upserted
    else missing reference
      UCLI-->>UCLI: Warn and skip
    end
  end
  UCLI-->>Dev: Summary and exit code
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 4 (Complex) | ⏱️ ~60 minutes

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Review effort 4/5, Possible security concern

Suggested reviewers

  • junkisai
  • NoritakaIkeda

Poem

Thump-thump, I hop with keys and cheer,
I packed the data and sent it near.
Inputs now "data", examples take flight,
Uploads and runs through day and night.
Carrots of metrics — hop, delight! 🥕

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (2 warnings)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Description Check ⚠️ Warning The description does not follow the repository’s template because it lacks the required “## Issue” heading and the “## Why is this change needed?” section, instead using “## Summary” and other custom headings. Please update the description to include the “## Issue” section with the resolve link under it and add a “## Why is this change needed?” heading with a brief rationale for the change to match the repository’s template.
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 33.33% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (1 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The title “feat(schema-bench): add LangSmith integration for evaluation tracking” clearly and concisely summarizes the main change of adding LangSmith support to schema-bench, reflecting the core feature introduced without unnecessary detail or noise.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/langsmith-integration

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/types.ts (1)

1-15: Import cycle risk from referencing shared LangSmith types

This types file isn’t referenced anywhere in the submitted changes; every consumer (upload CLI, evaluator, etc.) defines its own shapes inline. Keeping an unused export invites drift and can mislead API consumers. Either delete the file or wire these types into the new CLIs so the surface stays coherent.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 123bed1 and 4ca6989.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/README.md (1 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/package.json (2 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeLiamDbShared.ts (3 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts (4 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/uploadDatasetToLangsmith.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts (2 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/types.ts (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
**/*.ts

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Name utility files in camelCase (e.g., mergeSchema.ts)

Files:

  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/index.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeLiamDbShared.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/uploadDatasetToLangsmith.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/types.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts
**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Use TypeScript/TSX across the codebase

**/*.{ts,tsx}: Use runtime type validation with valibot for external data validation
Prefer early returns for readability
Write simple, direct code without backward compatibility shims; update all call sites together
Use const-assigned arrow functions instead of function declarations for small utilities (e.g., const toggle = () => {})
Follow existing import patterns and tsconfig path aliases

Files:

  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/index.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeLiamDbShared.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/uploadDatasetToLangsmith.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/types.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts
frontend/internal-packages/**

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Infra and tooling (e2e, configs, storybook, agent) live under frontend/internal-packages

Files:

  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/index.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/package.json
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeLiamDbShared.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/uploadDatasetToLangsmith.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/types.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/README.md
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-07-30T05:52:56.270Z
Learnt from: hoshinotsuyoshi
PR: liam-hq/liam#2771
File: frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeLiamDb.ts:22-22
Timestamp: 2025-07-30T05:52:56.270Z
Learning: The schema-bench package (frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench) has been converted from ESM to CommonJS mode by removing "type": "module" from package.json, making __dirname available and correct to use in TypeScript files within this package.

Applied to files:

  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/index.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/package.json
📚 Learning: 2025-09-02T05:53:14.356Z
Learnt from: CR
PR: liam-hq/liam#0
File: AGENTS.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-09-02T05:53:14.356Z
Learning: Before pushing, run formatting, linting, and tests: pnpm fmt && pnpm lint && pnpm test

Applied to files:

  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/package.json
🧬 Code graph analysis (5)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts (1)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/evaluate/evaluate.ts (1)
  • evaluate (220-284)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeLiamDbShared.ts (1)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts (1)
  • loadJsonFiles (17-71)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/uploadDatasetToLangsmith.ts (6)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/types.ts (1)
  • LangSmithDatasetConfig (12-15)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts (1)
  • loadJsonFiles (17-71)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/parseArgs.ts (1)
  • parseArgs (17-37)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/workspace.ts (1)
  • getWorkspacePath (14-16)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/selectTargetDatasets.ts (1)
  • selectTargetDatasets (13-28)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/filterAndResolveDatasets.ts (1)
  • filterAndResolveDatasets (10-30)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts (6)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/types.ts (2)
  • LangSmithInput (3-6)
  • LangSmithOutput (8-10)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts (1)
  • schemaEvaluator (20-61)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/parseArgs.ts (1)
  • parseArgs (17-37)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/workspace.ts (1)
  • getWorkspacePath (14-16)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/selectTargetDatasets.ts (1)
  • selectTargetDatasets (13-28)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/filterAndResolveDatasets.ts (1)
  • filterAndResolveDatasets (10-30)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts (1)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts (1)
  • loadJsonFiles (17-71)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: frontend-ci
  • GitHub Check: frontend-lint
  • GitHub Check: Supabase Preview
  • GitHub Check: security-review
🔇 Additional comments (1)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/uploadDatasetToLangsmith.ts (1)

12-15: Earlier feedback withdrawn
...

Comment on lines +109 to +115
evaluate(target, {
data: `schema-bench-${datasetName}`,
evaluators: [schemaEvaluator],
experimentPrefix: `${options.executorType}-${datasetName}`,
maxConcurrency: options.maxConcurrency,
numRepetitions: options.numRepetitions,
}),
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the main function for submitting evaluations to LangSmith.
ref: https://docs.langchain.com/langsmith/code-evaluator

Pass in the target and evaluators to execute and evaluate in one go. Use numRepetitions to run multiple executions.

Comment on lines +54 to +67
if (existingExample) {
await client.updateExample({
id: existingExample.id,
inputs: input,
outputs: reference,
})
} else {
await client.createExample({
inputs: input,
outputs: reference,
dataset_id: datasetId,
metadata: { caseId },
})
}
Copy link
Member Author

@MH4GF MH4GF Oct 8, 2025

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Before running evaluations on LangGraph, we must submit your dataset.

Comment on lines +32 to +39
{
key: 'Table Count',
score: countTables(outputSchema),
},
{
key: 'Column Count',
score: countColumns(outputSchema),
},
Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

To aid in understanding the output, I've included the count as well.

@MH4GF MH4GF marked this pull request as ready for review October 8, 2025 03:25
@MH4GF MH4GF requested a review from a team as a code owner October 8, 2025 03:25
@MH4GF MH4GF requested review from Copilot, junkisai, NoritakaIkeda and sasamuku and removed request for a team October 8, 2025 03:25
Copy link
Contributor

@Copilot Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR adds comprehensive LangSmith integration to schema-bench for advanced evaluation tracking, visualization, and experiment comparison. The integration allows uploading local datasets to LangSmith and running evaluations with both LiamDB and OpenAI executors.

  • LangSmith dataset upload functionality from local workspace files
  • Evaluation execution system with configurable repetitions and concurrency
  • Custom schema evaluator that tracks table/column counts and F1/recall scores

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 10 out of 11 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

Show a summary per file
File Description
src/langsmith/types.ts Defines TypeScript types for LangSmith integration
src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts Custom evaluator for schema similarity metrics
src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts Refactored utility for generic JSON file loading
src/cli/utils/index.ts Updated exports to reflect renamed utility
src/cli/uploadDatasetToLangsmith.ts CLI tool for uploading datasets to LangSmith
src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts Updated to use refactored file loading utility
src/cli/executeLiamDbShared.ts Updated to use refactored file loading utility
src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts CLI tool for running evaluations with LangSmith
package.json Added neverthrow dependency and npm scripts
README.md Added documentation for LangSmith integration
Files not reviewed (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml: Language not supported

Tip: Customize your code reviews with copilot-instructions.md. Create the file or learn how to get started.

Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Oct 8, 2025

🤖 Agent Deep Modeling Execution

Processing time: 3m 53s
Started at: 2025-10-08 03:39:26 UTC

Command Output

@liam-hq/[email protected] execute-deep-modeling /home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/internal-packages/agent
pnpm test:integration src/createGraph.integration.test.ts

@liam-hq/[email protected] test:integration /home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/internal-packages/agent
vitest --watch=false --passWithNoTests --config vitest.config.integration.ts src/createGraph.integration.test.ts

RUN v3.2.4 /home/runner/work/liam/liam/frontend/internal-packages/agent

(node:7673) ExperimentalWarning: WASI is an experimental feature and might change at any time
(Use node --trace-warnings ... to show where the warning was created)

✅ [INFO] 2025-10-08T03:39:29.485Z
LangSmith Trace URL: https://smith.langchain.com/o/eed4d2d8-0bd8-4ca4-a452-4da88ef63fd6/projects/p/9324fe51-27a4-4604-a52b-c6cc240f6dcc?searchModel=%7B%22filter%22%3A%22and(eq(is_root%2C%20true)%2C%20and(eq(metadata_key%2C%20%5C%22thread_id%5C%22)%2C%20eq(metadata_value%2C%20%5C%22d8ba3722-7b50-4d9d-abd9-7c7dc60bfcbf%5C%22)))%22%7D

⏺ (pm):

Purpose: Save the finalized goal and structured testcases for the simple user management system BRD so DB and QA agents can proceed. Inputs: goal string and categorized testcases object.

🧠 Thinking (pm)...

Creating a user management BRD

I need to create a BRD for a simple user management system that functions autonomously. I'll start with a checklist of 3-7 conceptual bullet points and focus on industry-standard assumptions since the schema is blank. I’ll structure the requirements and save them via the requirements tool, ensuring they’re actionable for both the database and QA agents. I’ll also think about entities, attributes, constraints, and essential features without letting scope creep in, keeping things minimal yet robust.

Defining user management components

I need to define the essential components of the user management system. First, for users, I’ll include fields like id, username, email, and status, along with unique constraints for email and username. Then, for roles, I want to establish a basic structure with a fixed set of roles and the possibility of adding permissions later. Lastly, for session management, I’m considering a user_tokens table to handle password resets and email verifications, keeping everything straightforward while covering the necessary features.

Including user authentication and audit features

I'm thinking about adding user authentication providers for optional OAuth functionality. For audit logs, I want to include a user_activity_log that captures changes and logins, while keeping it simple with an 'audit_trail' for CRUD operations. I need to ensure the DB design meets QA requirements, so I’ll outline test cases for various scenarios like user insertion, role updates, and managing tokens. I should also touch on security measures, such as strong password policies and PII protection, while keeping the BRD focused on business rules rather than implementation specifics.

Structuring the user management BRD

I need to outline several sections for the BRD, such as Business Context, Goals, In Scope, and Out of Scope. I’ll also specify the entities and data model requirements, including fields, types, and constraints. Functional requirements will be grouped into categories like User Registration and Authentication. Then, I’ll address non-functional requirements related to security and performance. We might need to define API endpoints as well. After drafting the BRD, I’ll ensure to save the requirements using the tool, focusing on the goal and test cases without including the entire document in the tool call.

Structuring Requirements for User Management System

I need to ensure the test cases are structured properly and distinct from the entire BRD. I want to include a checklist with about five key points and break up the document into major sections like Overview, Scope, and Assumptions. I'll define the data model, covering entities like users and roles, along with their fields and constraints. Factors like functional and non-functional requirements will be essential too. Additionally, I plan to include test cases segmented by categories—everything ensuring a solid framework without excessive complexity while aiming for clarity in forming actionable requirements.

Structuring Test Cases for User Management

I need to ensure that each test case includes both a title and a type, aiming for a total of 20-30 test cases. The tool payload must contain a "goal" string and a "testcases" object, which I'll prepare after presenting the BRD. I’ll start with a checklist, followed by assumptions, sections of the BRD, and then list the test cases.

For categories like Registration and Email Verification, Authentication, and Roles, I’ll create specific cases ensuring clarity in titles and relevant types while avoiding heavy formatting. After structuring everything, I'll finalize the tool call, ensuring we confirm successful completion!

🔧 saveRequirementsToArtifactTool(goal: "Define a simple, ...", testcases: {10 keys}) ⎿ unknown: Requirements saved successfully to artifact

🧠 Thinking (db)...

I’m focusing on creating a schema for a database, which includes fields like token text, user_id, expiration dates, and more for an audits table. I’ll need to define columns such as id, actor_id, and action details. After that, I plan to call a specific tool to help design the schema and then validate the result lines. Finally, I’ll confirm these changes with the user and organize the operations accordingly.

🔧 schemaDesignTool()

🧠 Thinking (db)...

Planning tool usage

I need to make sure I'm clear about my purpose before calling the tool and keep my inputs minimal. After I call the tool, I'll validate the result in just one or two lines. Then, I’ll wrap things up by reporting completion. It seems straightforward, but I want to ensure I'm methodical. Okay, let’s get started with this process!

🔧 schemaDesignTool()

⏺ (qa):

{
"sql": "-- Test Case: Emails are unique across users regardless of case\n-- Insert a new user and enforce case-insensitive unique constraint on email via lower(email).\n-- Assumptions:\n-- - UUIDs are generated with gen_random_uuid()\n-- - We populate all NOT NULL fields with realistic values\n-- - Appropriate timestamps use now()\n\n-- Ensure extension for gen_random_uuid() is available (uuid_generate_v4 would require extension; gen_random_uuid() from pgcrypto is standard)\n-- If not available, replace with gen_random_uuid() in each UUID column as shown.\n\nDO $$\nBEGIN\n

⏺ (qa):

{
-- "sql": Create a clean test "-- Test sandbox Case: Attempt by inserting two email verification users with emails with expired token that differ only is rejected and token marked by case\n unusable \n -- First-- Type user:: test UPDATE\[email protected] Scenario: A user attempts to verify their\n INSERT INTO users

🔧 saveTestcase() email (\ usingn id an,\ expired token. The systemn name should:,\n email,\n phone,\n

⏺ (qa):

{
"sql":n-- status,\ "-- Test

🔧 saveTestcase()n username,\ Case: Listingn 1) & Reject avatar_url Search\n the verification,\n -- Category: attempt due created_at to token,\ expiryn Listing & Search\n--.\ Titlen-- updated_at,\n 2: Search by partial username) Mark the deleted_at,\n or email returns matching active locked_until token as unus users onlyable (e,\n .g.,\n--

🔧 saveTestcase() password_hash Type update: status SELECT\n

⏺ (qa):

{
",\sql":n email_verified\n-- Ass "-- Test_at,\ Caseum to: Softptions:\ 'expired-deleted user cannotn failed_login_attempt' or a designatedn-- - Active users authenticate\n 'used-- Category: Authentication & Locking\n-- Title:s,\n require_password_reset\n ) VALUES (\n are those with:\n-- a) deleted_at IS NULL Soft-deleted user cannot authenticate\n-- Type: SELECT\n gen_random_uuid(),\n 'Alice Example\n-- b) status NOT IN ('suspended' state as appropriate).\n-- Assumptions based on schema:\n-- - tokens table stores token, type,\n-- Assumptions:\n-- - authentication would',\n '[email protected]',\n '+155501001', 'deleted') or equivalent active statuses defined in your enum/type status, expires_at, user_id, etc.\n-- - token_status enum

🔧 saveTestcase()

🔧 saveTestcase() typically verify user by id or username/email and check status and soft-delete (deleted_at01',\n 'active'::user_status,\n 'alice_example\n-- - We search case-insensitively on username and email/type exists; common values might include 'pending', 'used', 'expired'.

🔧 saveTestcase() IS NULL).\n-- - We demonstrate a SELECT',\n NULL,\n now using ILIKE for partial matches.\n-- - If 'expired' is not

🔧 saveTestcase() that would be used in an authentication check to ensure that(),\n now(),\n NULL,\ We include pagination parameters as placeholders: :limit and :offset to defined, adapt to existing values.\n-- - email

⏺ (qa):

{
"sql": "-- Test Case: Admin performs soft delete; user status becomes deleted and authentication blocked\n a user with a non-null deleted_at is rejected.\nn NULL,\n 'password_hash_placeholder enable paging.\n-- - We return a deterministic, stable set with necessary fields verification flow uses type = 'verification' and status\n-- Example: Find active users who attempted login but are soft-de',\n now(),\n 0,\n for listing.\n\nSELECT\n u.id,\ = 'pending' for unconsumed-- Type: UPDATE\n-- Objective: Soft-delete a user by setting deleted_at, status to 'deleted', and blockleted (should not be considered false\n );\n\n -- Secondn u.username,\n u.name,\ tokens.\n authentication by adjusting related fields.\n\n

🔧 saveTestcase() authenticated).\n-- This query demonstrates selecting a user candidate by login identifier (email or username user with email differing only by case: [email protected]\n -- This insert should fail due to unique index on lower(email)\n BEGIN\n INSERT INTOn u.email,\n u.avatar_url,\n u.created_at,\n u.updated_at,\n u.status\nFROM\n-- - We perform an UPDATE on a specific token row identified by a known token value or token id.\n-- - In production, you would pass in the token value (orBEGIN;\n\n-- Assumptions:\n-- - We identify the target user by a known uuid: :target_user_id\n-- - Admin performing the action is

🔧 saveTestcase()

🔧 saveTestcase()) and enforcing soft-delete check.\n\n-- Parameters (to be bound by application):\n-- :login_input (text) can be an email or username\n-- :now (timestamptz) current timestamp for evaluating users (\n id,\n name,\n email,\n phone,\n status,\n username,\n avatar_url,\n created_at,\n updated_at,\n deleted_at,\n locked_until,\n password_hash,\n email_verified_at,\n failed_login users AS u\nWHERE\n u.deleted_at IS NULL\n AND u.status <> 'deleted'\n AND (\n LOWER(u.username) LIKE LOWER('%' || :search_prefix || '%')\n OR LOWER(u.email id) and the acting user (optional) for auditing.\n-- - For auditable behavior, an audit entry could be recorded; however this test focuses on token state change.\n\n-- Begin by declaring the input parameters (as inline literals for the test):\n-- Replace :token_id_or_value with the actual represented by :admin_actor_id\n-- - Status enum type for users is assumed to include 'active', 'inactive', 'deleted'. If a different enum is used, adjust accordingly.\n-- - If

🔧 saveTestcase()

🔧 saveTestcase() locked_until, etc. (not strictly required here but common in auth checks)\n\nWITH candidate AS (\n SELECT\n u.id,\n u.email,\n u.username,\n u.status,\n u.locked_until_attempts,\n require_password_reset\n ) VALUES (\n gen_random_uuid(),\n 'Bob Example',\n '[email protected]',\n '+15550100102',\n 'active'::user_status,\n 'bob_example',\n NULL,\n now(),\n NULL,\n NULL,\n NULL,\n 'password_hash_placeholder',\n NULL,\n 0,\n false\n );\n EXCEPTION WHEN unique_violation THEN\n -- Expected: the insert should fail due to case-insensitive unique constraint on lower(email)\n ) LIKE LOWER('%' || :search_prefix || '%')\n )\nORDER BY\n u.username ASC\nLIMIT :limit\nOFFSET :offset;\n"
} token identifying value for the test.\n\n-- 1) Identify the expired token associated with the given token value/id and ensure it's expired.\n-- 2) Attempt to update verification status and expect rejection if expired.\n-- 3) Regardless of rejection, mark the token as unusable (set status to 'expired' and set used_at).\n\n-- Step A: Validate token is expired (for reference only in comments). The UPDATE will fail the business rule if expired; we simulate by performing the operation in one statement with a conditional check in RETURNING to verify outcome.\n\nWITH target AS (\n SELECT t.id, t.status, t.expires_at, t.user_id, t.type\n failed_login_attempts should be reset or left, decide on policy. Here we keep it as-is unless business rules require otherwise.\n\n-- Replace the placeholders with real values when running:\n-- :target_user_id -> UUID of the user to soft-delete\n-- :admin_actor_id -> UUID of the admin performing the operation\n\nDO $$\nDECLARE\n v_now timestamptz := now();\n v_user_deleted boolean;\nBEGIN\n -- Ensure the target user exists and is not already deleted\n SELECT EXISTS (\n SELECT 1 FROM users\n WHERE id = :target_user_id\n AND deleted_at IS NULL\n ) INTO v_user_deleted;\n\n

🔧 saveTestcase()

🔧 saveTestcase()

🔧 saveTestcase(),\n u.deleted_at,\n u.password_hash\n FROM users u\n WHERE lower(u.email) = lower(:login_input)\n OR lower(u.username) = lower(:login_input)\n)\nSELECT\n c.id,\n c.email,\n c.username,\n c.status,\n c.locked_until,\n c.deleted_at,\n c.password_hash\nFROM candidate c\nWHERE c.deleted_at IS NULL\n AND c.password_hash IS NOT NULL\n AND (c.locked_until IS NULL OR c.locked_until <= now())\n -- If you want to explicitly enforce that soft-deleted users cannot authenticate, ensure deleted_at is NULL in the main auth path\n -- The following line reinforces the business rule in a testing context:\n -- Deleted users should not authenticate; they will be filtered out by deleted_at IS NULL above\n;\n"
} RAISE NOTICE 'Unique email constraint on lower(email) prevented duplicate: [email protected]';\n END;\n\n -- Optional: Demonstrate that the constraint is enforced by attempting a legitimate new email differing in case elsewhere\n INSERT INTO users (\n id,\n name,\n email,\n phone,\n status,\n username,\n avatar_url,\n created_at,\n updated_at,\n deleted_at,\n locked_until,\n password_hash,\n email_verified_at,\n failed_login_attempts,\n require_password_reset\n ) VALUES (\n gen_random_uuid(),\n 'Charlie Example',\n '[email protected]',\n '+15550100103',\n 'active'::user_status,\n 'charlie_example',\n NULL,\n now(),\n NULL,\n NULL,\n NULL,\n 'password_hash_placeholder',\n now(),\n 0,\n false\n );\nEND;\n$$;\n\n-- If the test harness executes the above block, it will:\n-- 1) Insert the first user with email [email protected]\n-- 2) Attempt to insert [email protected] and catch the unique_violation due to LOWER(email) unique constraint\n-- 3) Show a successful insertion of a distinct email [email protected]\n\n-- Notes:\n-- - The actual schema must enforce a unique constraint on lower(email). Example constraint would look like:\n-- ALTER TABLE users ADD CONSTRAINT users_email_lower_unique UNIQUE (lower(email));\n-- - The above test assumes such a constraint exists in production.\n",
"notes": "Ensure the users.email uniqueness constraint on lower(email) is present in the production schema. The test uses gen_random_uuid() for UUIDs, now() for timestamps, and realistic placeholders for password_hash. Adjust enum types and required fields as per your actual schema definitions."
} FROM tokens t\n WHERE t.id = :token_id_or_value OR t.token = :token_id_or_value\n AND t.type = 'verification'\n FOR UPDATE\n)\nUPDATE tokens\nSET\n status = 'expired',\n used_at = now(),\n -- Keep metadata minimal; real systems might log intent\n -- metadata can be augmented if needed\n created_at = created_at\nFROM target\nWHERE tokens.id = target.id\n AND (target.expires_at IS NULL OR target.expires_at <= now())\nRETURNING\n tokens.id AS token_id,\n tokens.status AS token_status,\n tokens.expires_at AS token_expires_at,\n tokens.user_id AS token_user_id,\n target.type AS token_type\n;\n\n-- Step B: If the token was not expired, perform the normal verification flow. Since this test is about an expired token being rejected, we simulate a guard by using a DO block to raise NOTICE when expired and perform no state change beyond marking as expired above.\nDO $$\nBEGIN\n -- This block is a guard to ensure we do not proceed with successful verification when token is expired.\n IF EXISTS (\n SELECT 1\n FROM tokens t\n WHERE t.id = COALESCE((SELECT id FROM target), NULL) OR t.token = COALESCE((SELECT id FROM target), NULL)\n ) THEN\n -- If there is a row in target and its expires_at is in the past, we consider verification rejected.\n IF (SELECT expires_at FROM target) IS NOT NULL AND (SELECT expires_at FROM target) <= now() THEN\n -- No further action; the previous update already marked as expired. Exit gracefully.\n NULL;\n ELSE\n -- In non-expired case, this would proceed with verification logic. For this test, we do nothing here.\n NULL;\n IF NOT v_user_deleted THEN\n RAISE EXCEPTION 'Target user not found or already deleted';\n END IF;\n\n -- Perform soft-delete: set deleted_at, update status to 'deleted', and block authentication by locking until in the future if desired\n UPDATE users\n SET\n deleted_at = v_now,\n status = 'deleted',\n updated_at = v_now,\n -- Optional: lock the account immediately for safety (set locked_until to a far future timestamp) if your workflow requires\n locked_until = NULL -- or: v_now + interval '1 year' depending on policy\n WHERE id = :target_user_id;\n\n -- Audit the action\n INSERT INTO audits (action, details, actor_id, created_at, target_user_id)\n VALUES (\n 'user.soft_delete',\n jsonb_build_object('target_user_id', :target_user_id, 'performed_by', :admin_actor_id),\n :admin_actor_id,\n v_now,\n :target_user_id\n );\n\n -- If there is any active session token logic, you may invalidate tokens here (handled by application layer or separate purge job)\n\n COMMIT;\nEXCEPTION\n WHEN OTHERS THEN\n ROLLBACK;\n RAISE;\nEND;\n$$;\n"
}

⏺ (qa):

{
"sql": "\n-- Test Case: Non-admin user cannot assign or escalate roles\n-- Type: UPDATE\n-- Goal: Ensure that a user without admin privileges cannot insert into user_roles or modify role assignments\n\n-- Assumptions based on schema:\n-- - Roles table contains a key column with business keys like 'admin', 'manager', 'member'\n-- - user_roles.assignments are created by inserting into user_roles with role_id and user_id\n-- - There's a trigger or business logic that prevents non-admins from assigning roles; here we simulate via controlled UPDATE under test\n\n-- 1) Setup: Create a non-admin user and a target user, ensure roles exist\nDO $$\nBEGIN\n -- Create test users if not exist\n IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM users WHERE email ILIKE '[email protected]') THEN\n INSERT INTO users(id, name, email, status, username, created_at, updated_at, failed_login_attempts, require_password_reset, password_hash)\n VALUES (gen_random_uuid(), 'Alice Admin', '[email protected]', 'active', 'alice_admin', now(), now(), 0, FALSE, 'pbkdf2$dummy')\n ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING;\n END IF;\n IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM users WHERE email ILIKE '[email protected]') THEN\n INSERT INTO users(id, name, email, status, username, created_at, updated_at, failed_login_attempts, require_password_reset, password_hash)\n VALUES (gen_random_uuid(), 'Bob User', '[email protected]', 'active', 'bob_user', now(), now(), 0, FALSE, NULL)\n ON CONFLICT DO NOTHING;\n END IF;\nEND\n$$;\n\n-- 2) Ensure roles contain an admin and a member role; fetch their ids\nDO $$BEGIN\n IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM roles WHERE key = 'admin') THEN\n INSERT INTO roles(id, key, name, description)\n VALUES (DEFAULT, 'admin', 'Administrator', 'Has full access to system');\n END IF;\n IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM roles WHERE key = 'member') THEN\n INSERT INTO roles(id, key, name, description)\n VALUES (DEFAULT, 'member', 'Member', 'Standard user privileges');\n END IF;\nEND\n$$;\n\n-- 3) Fetch ids for test actions\nDO $$BEGIN\n IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM user_roles ur JOIN users u ON ur.user_id = u.id WHERE u.email = '[email protected]') THEN\n -- create a user mapping for Bob if not exists\n IF NOT EXISTS (SELECT 1 FROM users WHERE email = '[email protected]') THEN\n RAISE NOTICE 'Bob user missing';\n END IF;\n END IF;\nEND\n$$;\n\n-- 4) Attempt: Non-admin user (bob_user) attempts to assign admin role to themselves or others\n-- We simulate an UPDATE that would grant a role, guarded by a check that the acting user has admin rights.\n-- Since the schema does not encode the acting user in this UPDATE path, we simulate by performing a controlled update\n-- and ensuring that a compliant policy would block it. The test case ensures that without admin, such UPDATE is not permitted.\n\n-- For test isolation, wrap in a transaction that will be rolled back if any violation occurs.\nBEGIN;\n\n-- 5) Identify IDs for creating a role assignment attempt by non-admin\nWITH acting AS (\n SELECT u.id AS acting_user

🔧 saveTestcase()

⏺ (qa):

{
"sql": "
-- Test Case: Profile Management - Changing email sets status to pending_verification and issues new token
-- Type: UPDATE
-- Assumptions:
-- - When a user updates their email, we set email to NEW_EMAIL, set email_verified_at to NULL,
-- status to 'pending_verification' (assuming a corresponding value exists in user_status enum/type),
-- and create a new token for email verification (type = 'verification'), with a short expiry.
-- - We record the operation in audits and tokens table; we assume: there is a token type 'verification'
-- and token_status that allows 'pending' or 'active' semantics; we will set status to 'unused'/'pending' as applicable.
-- - Use gen_random_uuid() for any UUIDs if needed; here, user_id comes from existing user, token.id uses bigserial.
-- - All constraints (foreign keys, NOT NULL, CHECKs) are respected by inserting a new token row and updating user row atomically.
-- - We parameterize NEW_EMAIL and target_user_id via placeholders for integration; here we demonstrate using a sample user_id.
-- Replace :target_user_id and :new_email with actual values in your test harness as needed.

WITH updated AS (
UPDATE users
SET
email = :new_email,
email_verified_at = NULL,
status = 'pending_verification',
updated_at = now(),
-- Optionally ignore unique constraint cascade here; the unique constraint on lower(email) will enforce uniqueness
-- If there is a system to reset failed_login_attempts due to email change, you can adjust here.
-- Do not alter created_at or deleted_at
-- Clear any previously verified fields if required by business rules
-- For safety: set username validation remains unchanged
WHERE id = :target_user_id
RETURNING id, email
)
INSERT INTO tokens (
type,
token,
status,
user_id,
metadata,
created_at,
created_by,
expires_at
)
VALUES (
'verification', -- token_type
gen_random_uuid()::text, -- token placeholder; in real system use secure random string; using UUID here for test determinism
'pending', -- token_status
(SELECT id FROM updated), -- user_id from updated user
jsonb_build_object('purpose','email_verification','new_email', (SELECT email FROM updated)) ,
now(),
NULL, -- created_by: system
(now() + interval '24 hours') -- expires_at
)
RETURNING id;

⏺ (qa):

{
"sql": "-- Test Case: Password Reset - Reset attempt with expired or already-used token is rejected\n-- Category: Password Reset\n-- Title: Reset attempt with expired or already-used token is rejected\n-- Type: UPDATE\n\n-- Scenario: A password reset token should be rejected if it is expired or already used.\n-- Preconditions: We assume a user exists and a token row exists with type = 'password_reset'.\n\n-- 1) Attempt to use a token that is expired (expires_at in the past) and ensure it is rejected\nUPDATE tokens\nSET status = 'expired', -- mark as expired if not already\n used_at = NULL, -- ensure not marked as used\n metadata = COALESCE(metadata, '{}') || jsonb_build_object('note', 'expired-token-test')\nWHERE type = 'password_reset'\n AND expires_at < NOW()\n AND status NOT IN ('used', 'expired');\n\n-- 2) Attempt to use a token that has already been used (used_at is not null)\nUPDATE tokens\nSET status = 'used',\n used_at = NOW(),\n metadata = COALESCE(metadata, '{}') || jsonb_build_object('note', 'token-already-used')\nWHERE type = 'password_reset'\n AND used_at IS NOT NULL\n AND status NOT IN ('used', 'expired');\n\n-- 3) Enforce business logic: an UPDATE that would reset a password should only apply if token is valid (not expired and not used)\n-- We simulate the update by performing a conditional update which affects a user's password_hash only when there exists a valid token\nWITH valid_token AS (\n SELECT t.user_id\n FROM tokens t\n WHERE t.type = 'password_reset'\n AND t.status = 'valid'\n AND (t.expires_at IS NULL OR t.expires_at > NOW())\n AND t.used_at IS NULL\n LIMIT 1\n)\nUPDATE users u\nSET password_hash = 'REDACTED_HASH',\n updated_at = NOW()\nFROM valid_token vt\nWHERE u.id = vt.user_id\n AND NOT EXISTS (\n SELECT 1\n FROM tokens t\n WHERE t.type = 'password_reset'\n AND t.user_id = u.id\n AND (t.expires_at IS NULL OR t.expires_at <= NOW())\n OR t.used_at IS NOT NULL\n );\n\n-- 4) Rejection path: If no valid token exists, raise a notice-like signal through a RAISE EX END IF;\n END IF;\nEND\n$$;\n\n-- Validation (for test harness):\n-- 1) Ensure there exists a token row with the given id/value, of type 'verification', and that expires_at <= now() (expired).\n-- 2) The final state should reflect status = 'expired' and used_at not null.\n\nSELECT\n t.id AS token_id,\n t.type AS token_type,\n t.status AS token_status,\n t.expires_at AS token_expires_at,\n t.used_at AS token_used_at\nFROM tokens t\nWHERE t.id = COALESCE((SELECT id FROM target), NULL) OR t.token = COALESCE((SELECT id FROM target), NULL);\n"
}(node:7673) Warning: The 'import-in-the-middle' hook has already been initialized
(Use node --trace-warnings ... to show where the warning was created)
_id\n FROM users u\n WHERE u.email = '[email protected]' -- non-admin user\n), target AS (\n SELECT u2.id AS target_user_id\n FROM users u2\n WHERE u2.email = '[email protected]'\n), admin_role AS (\n SELECT r.id AS role_id\n FROM roles r\n WHERE r.key = 'admin'\n)\nINSERT INTO user_roles (role_id, user_id, created_at, assigned_at)\nSELECT admin_role.role_id, target.target_user_id, now(), now()\nFROM acting, target, admin_role\n-- This insert should be blocked by business rules in production; here we proceed to validate constraints.\nWHERE FALSE; -- Prevent actual record creation in test; placeholder to illustrate UPDATE path\n\n;\n\n-- 6) Validation: Ensure that no new role assignments were created by non-admin in test run\n-- If the system has a trigger or policy, it would raise an error; here we simply check no rows were inserted.\nSELECT 'Validation complete: non-admin cannot assign roles' AS result;\n\nROLLBACK; -- Do not persist test artifacts\n"
}"
}CEPTION to simulate rejection\nDO $$\nBEGIN\n IF NOT EXISTS (\n SELECT 1\n FROM tokens t\n WHERE t.type = 'password_reset'\n AND t.status = 'valid'\n AND (t.expires_at IS NULL OR t.expires_at > NOW())\n AND t.used_at IS NULL\n ) THEN\n RAISE EXCEPTION 'Password reset rejected: no valid token available';\n END IF;\nEND$$;\n"
}

🔧 saveTestcase()

🔧 saveTestcase()

⏺ (qa):

{"sql":"-- Test case: Consecutive failed logins increment failed_login_attempts and lock account after threshold\n-- This UPDATE handles a failed login event for a specific user.\n-- Threshold assumed to be 5 consecutive failed attempts; after reaching or exceeding the threshold, lock the account by setting locked_until.\n\nWITH prev AS (\n SELECT id, failed_login_attempts, locked_until\n FROM users\n WHERE id = $1\n FOR UPDATE\n)\nUPDATE users\nSET\n failed_login_attempts = LEAST(COALESCE(prev.failed_login_attempts, 0) + 1, 2147483647),\n locked_until = CASE\n WHEN COALESCE(prev.failed_login_attempts, 0) + 1 >= 5 THEN now()\n ELSE NULL\n END,\n updated_at = now()\nFROM prev\nWHERE users.id = prev.id\nRETURNING\n users.id,\n users.failed_login_attempts,\n users.locked_until,\n users.updated_at;"}

⏺ (qa):

{
"sql": "-- Admin assigns role to a user: give a user (member) a new role (manager)\n-- Assumptions:\n-- - There exists a user with id: target_user_id\n-- - There exists a role with key 'manager' and id\n-- - This operation records an entry in user_roles and logs an audit in audits\n-- - We perform within a transaction to ensure consistency and constraints\n\nDO $$\nBEGIN\n\n -- Replace these placeholders with concrete UUID values before execution or via test harness:\n -- target_user_id: UUID of the user receiving the role\n -- actor_id: UUID of the admin performing the assignment (nullable if system)\n\n -- 1) Resolve the target user and the role_id for key = 'manager'\n -- Note

🔧 saveTestcase()(node:7673) Warning: The 'import-in-the-middle' hook has already been initialized
(node:7673) Warning: The 'import-in-the-middle' hook has already been initialized
: role_id will be NULL if no such role exists; we guard accordingly\n WITH params AS (\n SELECT\n target_user_id::uuid AS user_id,\n actor_id::uuid AS actor_id\n ),\n role_lookup AS (\n SELECT id AS role_id

🔧 saveTestcase()

⏺ (qa):

{
"sql": "-- Test Case: Admin lists users with pagination and role filter returns expected subset\n-- Objective: Ensure SELECT supports pagination(node:7673) Warning: The 'import-in-the-middle' hook has already been initialized
(node:7673) Warning: The 'import-in-the-middle' hook has already been initialized
FROM roles WHERE key = 'manager' LIMIT 1\n ),\n existing AS (\n and filtering by role with proper SELECT 1 joins and constraints.\n\n-- Assumptions:\n-- - active users are\n those without deleted_at FROM (i user_roles.e ur.,\n deleted_at IS NULL)\n-- - role filter is by role key (e.g., 'admin', 'manager', 'member')\n-- - include basic user fields for listing; paginate with limit/ JOIN params p ON TRUE\n JOIN role_lookup rl ON TRUE\n WHERE ur.user_id = p.user_id\n AND ur.role_id = rl.role_id\n AND (ur.expires_at IS NULL OR ur.expires_at > now())\n LIMIT 1\n ),\n now_t AS ((node:7673) Warning: The 'import-in-the-middle' hook has already been initialized
offset; sort by created_at DESC by default\n-- - join user_roles and roles to filter by an SELECT now() AS t\n )\n INSERT INTO user_roles (role_id given role key; users without, user_id the role are, created_at, assigned_at excluded when a filter is provided\n\n, assigned_by)--n SELECT rl Parameters (.roleto_id be, p.user substituted by_id test harness):

🔧 saveTestcase()\n,-- t .t page_num, integer t,.t page,_size p.actor_id integer\n, role _key_filter FROM role_lookup text rl,\n\n params p,WITH filtered_users AS (\n now_t t SELECT u\n .id,\ WHERE rln .role u_id IS.name,\ NOTn NULL\n u.email,\ AND NOT EXISTS (SELECT n u.username,\n u1.status FROM existing,\n );\n u.created_at\n -- ,\n 3) Audit the action regardless u.updated_at of insert outcome\n INSERT INTO audits (action, details,, actorn _id, created_at, target_user_id)\n u .avatar_url SELECT\n \n ' FROMuser.role.assign', users AS\n jsonb_build_object(\n 'assigned_role_key', ' umanager\n ',\n ' WHEREtarget_user u.deleted_at_id', p IS NULL.user_id

⏺ (qa):

{
\n),\n\ " ),nsql":with "--_rolen Insert AS a (\ new usern with SELECT unique fu.id,\ emailn and p username and fu.actor_id set.name status,\ ton pending _ver fu,\ification\nn .email,\ t.t-- Assn,\um nptions fu:\ p.usernamen,--n -.user fu.status gen_random,_uuidn _id()\n fu is FROM available.created (pg params_at,\crypto p, extension now_t)\ tnn fu.updated;-- - Currentn\n timestamp_atEND\n,\ isn now$$ fu.avatar_url\n FROM filtered_users fu\n INNER JOIN()\n-- - email uniqueness enforced on lower LANGUAGE plpgsql;"
} user_roles ur ON ur.user_id = fu.id(email)\n--\n INNER JOIN - roles username r uniqueness ON enforced r.id on lower = ur(username.role)_idn\n\n INSERT WHERE CO INTOALES usersCE(NULL (\IF(:rolen id,_keyn _filter name, NULL),,\n email,\ true) -- placeholder forn test phone harness,\n status,\n injection username,\n\n -- avatar The_url,\ actualn filter is applied created_at below,\ vian CASE deleted; keep structure_at,\ compatible withn test updated harness\n_at,\n)\n SELECT locked w_until.id,,\nn w password.name,_hashn,\ n w.email ,\ emailn_verified _at w,.username,\nn failed w_login.status_attempt,\sn ,\n require w_password.created_reset_at,\n \n)\nVALUES (\ w.updatedn_at ,\ gen_randomn w_uuid.avatar(),_url\n FROM with -- id_role\n w \nORDER NULL, BY -- w.created name_at\n DESC\nLIMIT CO ALES '[email protected](NULLIF'(:::textpage,_size --, NULL email),\n NULL0,) OFFSET CO -- phoneALESCE\n(NULL 'IFpending((_verification:page_num - 1'):: *user :page_size_status,, NULL --), status (must exist in0);\n enum"
/type)\n } 'new_user'::text, -- username\n NULL, -- avatar_url\n now(), -- created_at\n NULL, -- deleted_at\n now(), -- updated_at\n NULL, -- locked_until\n NULL, -- password_hash (null for pending)\n NULL, -- email_verified_at\n 0, -- failed_login_attempts\n FALSE -- require_password_reset\n)\nRETURNING id;"
} ⎿ unknown: 23/29 test cases passed, 6 failed

Test Case: Attempt registration with duplicate email is rejected (case-insensitive)

Error: column "status" is of type user_status but expression is of type text

-- Test: Attempt registration with duplicate email is rejected (case-insensitive)
-- Assumptions:
-- - emails are unique case-insensitively via unique constraint on lower(email)
-- - new user to insert should have required fields; use gen_random_uuid() for uuid

BEGIN;

-- Prepare: Ensure the lower(email) unique constraint exists. We model by inserting a first user, then attempt duplicate with different case.

-- Insert initial user with lower-case email
insert into users (id, name, email, phone, status, username, avatar_url, created_at, deleted_at, updated_at, locked_until, password_hash, email_verified_at, failed_login_attempts, require_password_reset)
values (
  gen_random_uuid(),
  'Alice Example',
  '[email protected]',
  NULL,
  'active'::text, -- assuming enum type or text; adapt to actual type if needed
  'alice_example',
  NULL,
  now(),
  NULL,
  now(),
  NULL,
  'hashedpassword1',
  now(),
  0,
  false
);

-- Attempt to insert duplicate with different case in email (should fail due to case-insensitive unique constraint)
-- We expect a unique violation on lower(email)
insert into users (id, name, email, phone, status, username, avatar_url, created_at, deleted_at, updated_at, locked_until, password_hash, email_verified_at, failed_login_attempts, require_password_reset)
values (
  gen_random_uuid(),
  'Bob Duplicate',
  '[email protected]',
  NULL,
  'active'::text,
  'bob_duplicate',
  NULL,
  now(),
  NULL,
  now(),
  NULL,
  'hashedpassword2',
  NULL,
  0,
  false
);

COMMIT;

Test Case: Verify email using a valid unexpired token sets status to active and stamps email_verified_at

Error: invalid input value for enum token_type: "verification"

-- Update test: Verify email using a valid unexpired token sets status to active and stamps email_verified_at
-- Preconditions: a user exists with a pending/needs verification status, and a valid, unexpired token of type 'verification' for that user.
-- This UPDATE should set the user's status to 'active' (assuming enum values in user_status) and set email_verified_at to now(), and mark the token as used (status changed and used_at), recording details in audits as a log of the event.

BEGIN;

-- Ensure we have proper example data; in production tests the data would exist. We fetch the token row for the user where type='verification', status='active' or 'issued' (depending on enum). Here we select for demonstration; we will update using parameters.

WITH t as (
  SELECT t.id as token_id, t.user_id, u.id as user_id
  FROM tokens t
  JOIN users u ON t.user_id = u.id
  WHERE t.type = 'verification'
    AND t.status = 'issued'
    AND t.expires_at IS NULL OR t.expires_at > now()
  ORDER BY t.created_at DESC
  LIMIT 1
)
UPDATE users u
SET
  status = 'active',
  email_verified_at = now(),
  updated_at = now()
FROM t
WHERE u.id = t.user_id
  AND u.status <> 'active';

-- If a token was found, mark it used
UPDATE tokens
SET status = 'used', used_at = now(), created_at = created_at
WHERE id = (SELECT token_id FROM t);

-- Audit entry for the update
INSERT INTO audits (action, details, actor_id, target_user_id, created_at)
VALUES (
  'user.update',
  jsonb_build_object(
    'note', 'Email verified via valid unexpired token',
    'user_id', (SELECT user_id FROM t),
    'token_id', (SELECT token_id FROM t),
    'new_status', 'active',
    'email_verified_at', now()
  ),
  NULL, -- actor is system/admin may be filled by trigger in real env
  (SELECT user_id FROM t),
  now()
);

COMMIT;

Test Case: Request password reset generates a single active token with expiration

Error: relation "target_user" does not exist

-- Test Case: Request password reset generates a single active token with expiration
-- Ensure a single active token exists for the user and token type = 'password_reset'
-- Assumptions: token table stores plain token hashed in production; here we insert a new token record with status 'pending' and expires_at set accordingly.
-- We'll simulate by inserting a new token for a given user, after ensuring any existing active tokens of the same type are deactivated/expired.

WITH target_user AS (
  SELECT id FROM users
  WHERE email = LOWER('[email protected]') AND deleted_at IS NULL
  LIMIT 1
)
SELECT 1 AS _placeholder
FROM target_user;

-- Step 1: Expire any existing active password_reset tokens for this user (status not in ('consumed','expired')), for safety
UPDATE tokens t
SET status = 'expired', used_at = NOW()
WHERE t.user_id IN (SELECT id FROM target_user)
  AND t.type = 'password_reset'
  AND t.status NOT IN ('consumed','expired');

-- Step 2: Insert a new password reset token
INSERT INTO tokens (
  type,
  token,
  status,
  used_at,
  user_id,
  metadata,
  created_at,
  created_by,
  expires_at
)
VALUES (
  'password_reset',
  gen_random_uuid()::text,  -- placeholder token; in production this would be a secure random token value; replace with cryptographic function
  'pending',
  NULL,
  (SELECT id FROM target_user),
  '{}'::jsonb,
  NOW(),
  NULL,
  NOW() + INTERVAL '30 minutes'
)
RETURNING id, type, token, status, user_id, expires_at, created_at;

Test Case: Reset password with valid token updates password_hash and invalidates token

Error: relation "t" does not exist

-- Test Case: Password Reset
-- Goal: Update user password_hash when a valid token is used, and invalidate that token.
-- Assumptions:
-- - token table stores token value hashed in column token; we receive a plaintext token_input from user flow, which we hash and compare to stored token.
-- - For simplicity in this test, we will operate using token value in cleartext via token column; in production this would be hashed. The test demonstrates the sequence with explicit checks.

-- Variables (would be bound in application code):
-- token_input -> plaintext token presented for reset
-- new_password_hash -> bcrypt/argon2 hash of the new password
-- now -> current timestamp

-- For safety, validate token status and expiry before updating user password and invalidate token after use

WITH t AS (
  SELECT t.id AS token_id, t.user_id, t.expires_at
  FROM tokens t
  WHERE t.type = 'password_reset'
    AND t.status = 'active'
    AND t.token = 'REDACTED_TOKEN'
  FOR UPDATE
)
UPDATE users u
SET password_hash = 'REDACTED_NEW_HASH',
    updated_at = NOW()
FROM t
WHERE u.id = t.user_id
  AND (t.expires_at IS NULL OR t.expires_at > NOW())
  AND u.deleted_at IS NULL
RETURNING u.id AS user_id, u.email, u.password_hash;

-- Invalidate the token after successful password reset
UPDATE tokens
SET status = 'used',
    used_at = NOW()
FROM t
WHERE tokens.id = t.token_id;

Test Case: User updates profile fields (name, phone, avatar) succeeds

Error: bind message supplies 0 parameters, but prepared statement "" requires 4

-- Test case: Update user profile fields (name, phone, avatar) succeeds
-- Objective: Ensure update on users table respects constraints and timestamps, and logs an audit record

WITH updated AS (
  UPDATE users
  SET
    name = COALESCE(NULLIF($1::text, ''), name),
    phone = COALESCE(NULLIF($2::text, ''), phone),
    avatar_url = COALESCE(NULLIF($3::text, ''), avatar_url),
    updated_at = now()
  WHERE id = $4::uuid
  RETURNING id, name, phone, avatar_url, updated_at
)
INSERT INTO audits (action, details, actor_id, created_at, target_user_id)
SELECT
  'user.update_profile'::text,
  jsonb_build_object('name', name, 'phone', phone, 'avatar_url', avatar_url),
  NULL, -- actor_id could be filled by application; NULL here for test
  now(),
  id
FROM updated;

-- Optional: select the updated row to verify
SELECT id, name, phone, avatar_url, updated_at FROM users WHERE id = $4::uuid;

Test Case: Role change writes a user.update audit entry including old and new role

Error: column "actor_id" does not exist

-- Insert an audit log entry for a role change on a user, capturing old and new roles
-- Assumptions: existing user_id, actor_id and target_user_id are known and valid in the test environment.
-- We will create a JSONB detail with old_role and new_role, plus role_change_type, and timestamp is created_at

WITH existing AS (
  SELECT u.id AS user_id, r_old.key AS old_role_key, r_new.key AS new_role_key
  FROM users u
  JOIN user_roles ur_old ON ur_old.user_id = u.id
  JOIN roles r_old ON r_old.id = ur_old.role_id
  JOIN user_roles ur_new ON ur_new.user_id = u.id
  JOIN roles r_new ON r_new.id = ur_new.role_id
  WHERE u.id = gen_random_uuid()
  LIMIT 1
)
INSERT INTO audits (action, details, actor_id, created_at, target_user_id)
VALUES (
  'user.update',
  jsonb_build_object(
    'change','role',
    'old_role', (SELECT old_role_key FROM existing),
    'new_role', (SELECT new_role_key FROM existing),
    'scope','roles',
    'notes','Role assignment change via admin UI'
  ),
  (SELECT actor_id FROM existing),
  now(),
  (SELECT user_id FROM existing)
);

⏺ (lead):

Summary of what was accomplished

  • Main user requirements analyzed

    • Build a simple, secure user management system with registration, authentication, role-based administration, and auditable lifecycle events.
    • Include email verification, password reset, account lifecycle (pending, active, suspended, locked, deleted), soft deletion, and admin-driven actions.
    • Ensure uniqueness for emails/usernames (case-insensitive), audit logging for key actions, and support for role-based access control (RBAC).
  • Key database design decisions

    • Introduced core schema elements:
      • Enums: user_status, token_type, token_status to model lifecycle and token flows.
      • Tables: users, roles, user_roles (many-to-many user-role assignments), tokens (for email verification, password resets, admin invites), audits (immutable event log).
    • Central user table (users) with lifecycle and profile fields, including soft delete via deleted_at and status-driven authentication flow.
    • Tokens table to manage single-use actions with status, expires_at, and metadata.
    • Roles and user_roles for RBAC with audit-friendly join table (user_roles) and constraints for referential integrity.
    • Audits table to log actions (user.create, user.login_failed, user.update, etc.) with actor, target_user, and metadata.
    • Added indexes to optimize lookups (e.g., unique constraints on normalized email/username, status-based queries).
    • Ensured soft-delete semantics by excluding deleted users from active listings and restricting actions on soft-deleted rows.
  • Schemas, tables, or data structures created/modified

    • Enums: user_status, token_type, token_status (and their allowed values).
    • Tables added or updated:
      • users: id (uuid), email (text or citext), username (text or citext), password_hash, profile fields, status (user_status), failed_login_attempts, locked_until, email_verified_at, require_password_reset, timestamps, deleted_at, and constraints (unique on normalized email/username).
      • roles: id, key, name, description, with unique index on key.
      • user_roles: id, user_id, role_id, assigned_at, expires_at, assigned_by, created_at; with FKs to users and roles and unique composite constraints.
      • tokens: id, user_id, token, type (token_type), status (token_status), expires_at, used_at, metadata, created_at, created_by; with FKs to users.
      • audits: id, actor_id, target_user_id, action, details, created_at; with FKs to users where applicable.
    • Implemented comprehensive test cases for various flows (registration, email verification, login with lockouts, password reset, profile updates, role assignments, admin user management, auditing, listing/searching).
  • Important outcomes or results

    • Schema design validated and updated to support a secure, auditable user management system with lifecycle states, token workflows, and RBAC.
    • DDL validation: initial attempt to apply the schema failed due to issues (citext extension), followed by a corrected design using standard text types and explicit enums; schema design tool reported success after adjustments.
    • Created a suite of test-case SQL statements covering critical flows:
      • Registration with unique emails, case-insensitive enforcement, and email verification.
      • Duplicate email rejection test with case-insensitive constraint.
      • Email verification flow updating user status and email_verified_at.
      • Handling of expired/invalid tokens and token state transitions.
      • Password reset token issuance, password update, and token invalidation.
      • Profile updates and email change behavior triggering new verification flow.
      • Roles and admin actions: assigning roles, admin-created accounts, suspensions/reactivations, and soft deletion.
      • Auditing actions for user creation, login failures, and role changes.
      • Listing, search, and pagination for admin views.
    • Demonstrated an iterative approach to ensure data integrity, referential integrity, and auditability across user lifecycle events.

If you’d like, I can pare this down to a minimal production-ready DDL script (with concrete enum definitions and trigger-based audit logging) or provide a ready-to-run migration plan for your target DB (PostgreSQL) with concrete sample data.·

Test Files 1 passed (1)
Tests 1 passed (1)
Start at 03:39:27
Duration 231.83s (transform 449ms, setup 0ms, collect 1.37s, tests 230.13s, environment 0ms, prepare 66ms)

Status: Completed successfully

Finished at: 2025-10-08 03:43:19 UTC

MH4GF and others added 5 commits October 9, 2025 18:56
Replace specialized loadInputFiles with generic loadJsonFiles function.

- Rename loadInputFiles.ts to loadJsonFiles.ts
- Update executeLiamDbShared.ts to use loadJsonFiles with explicit path
- Update executeOpenaiUnified.ts to use loadJsonFiles with explicit path
- Change return value key from 'input' to 'data' for consistency
- Remove loadInputFiles export from utils/index.ts

This simplifies the codebase by having a single, flexible function for
loading JSON files from any directory.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Add comprehensive LangSmith integration to schema-bench for advanced evaluation tracking, visualization, and experiment comparison.

Key features:
- LangSmith dataset upload from local workspace files
- Evaluation execution with LiamDB and OpenAI executors
- Schema metrics tracking (table/column counts, F1 scores, recall)
- Configurable repetitions and concurrency
- neverthrow-based error handling for type safety

Implementation details:
- Created evaluateWithLangsmith.ts for running evaluations
- Created uploadDatasetToLangsmith.ts for dataset management
- Added schemaEvaluator for computing schema similarity metrics
- Integrated @liam-hq/neverthrow for functional error handling
- Added loadJsonFiles utility for consistent file loading
- Used ResultAsync.combine for parallel async operations

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Replace manual error handler in fromPromise with @liam-hq/neverthrow's
default error handler for consistency across the codebase.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
…mith

Add non-null assertion for apiKey after handleCliError check.

Since handleCliError returns never, apiKey is guaranteed to be defined
after the check, but TypeScript's control flow analysis doesn't recognize this.

🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)

Co-Authored-By: Claude <[email protected]>
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

♻️ Duplicate comments (3)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts (3)

82-82: Remove redundant fallback and non-null assertion.

The apiKey is guaranteed to be truthy after the check on lines 78-80 (where handleCliError exits the process). Both the || '' fallback and the ! non-null assertion are unnecessary.

Apply this diff:

-    const executor = new OpenAIExecutor({ apiKey: apiKey! })
+    const executor = new OpenAIExecutor({ apiKey })

97-97: Remove unreachable code.

handleCliError exits the process and never returns, making this line unreachable. Consider restructuring to make the control flow explicit or removing the return statement.

If handleCliError is typed as never, consider this refactor:

-  return handleCliError(`Unknown executor type: ${executorType}`)
+  handleCliError(`Unknown executor type: ${executorType}`)

119-125: Fix the ResultAsync return type.

The function is async but returns ResultAsync.combineWithAllErrors(results) directly without awaiting. This means await runDatasets(...) on line 151 resolves to the ResultAsync wrapper instead of a concrete Result, breaking the isErr() check on line 153.

Apply this diff:

 const runDatasets = async (
   datasets: Array<{ name: string }>,
   options: ExecutorOptions,
 ) => {
   const results = datasets.map(({ name }) => runEvaluation(name, options))
-  return ResultAsync.combineWithAllErrors(results)
+  return await ResultAsync.combineWithAllErrors(results)
 }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 70e75dc and 8852d25.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
  • pnpm-lock.yaml is excluded by !**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (10)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/README.md (1 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/package.json (2 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeLiamDbShared.ts (3 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts (4 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/uploadDatasetToLangsmith.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/index.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts (2 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts (1 hunks)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/types.ts (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (6)
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/index.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeLiamDbShared.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/package.json
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/README.md
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/types.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/uploadDatasetToLangsmith.ts
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (3)
**/*.ts

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Name utility files in camelCase (e.g., mergeSchema.ts)

Files:

  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts
**/*.{ts,tsx}

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Use TypeScript/TSX across the codebase

**/*.{ts,tsx}: Use runtime type validation with valibot for external data validation
Prefer early returns for readability
Write simple, direct code without backward compatibility shims; update all call sites together
Use const-assigned arrow functions instead of function declarations for small utilities (e.g., const toggle = () => {})
Follow existing import patterns and tsconfig path aliases

Files:

  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts
frontend/internal-packages/**

📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (AGENTS.md)

Infra and tooling (e2e, configs, storybook, agent) live under frontend/internal-packages

Files:

  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts
  • frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts
🧬 Code graph analysis (3)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts (6)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/types.ts (2)
  • LangSmithInput (3-6)
  • LangSmithOutput (8-10)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts (1)
  • schemaEvaluator (20-61)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/parseArgs.ts (1)
  • parseArgs (17-37)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/workspace.ts (1)
  • getWorkspacePath (14-16)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/selectTargetDatasets.ts (1)
  • selectTargetDatasets (13-28)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/filterAndResolveDatasets.ts (1)
  • filterAndResolveDatasets (10-30)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts (1)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts (1)
  • loadJsonFiles (17-71)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts (1)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/evaluate/evaluate.ts (1)
  • evaluate (220-284)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (4)
  • GitHub Check: Supabase Preview
  • GitHub Check: frontend-ci
  • GitHub Check: frontend-lint
  • GitHub Check: Supabase Preview
🔇 Additional comments (13)
frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts (2)

9-18: LGTM!

The helper functions countTables and countColumns are simple, correct, and efficiently compute the required metrics.


31-60: LGTM!

The metric definitions are clear and comprehensive, covering all the evaluation dimensions from the evaluate function. The inclusion of both counts and scores provides good visibility into the evaluation results.

frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/executeOpenaiUnified.ts (3)

3-3: LGTM!

The import additions correctly support the updated path construction and the refactored loadJsonFiles utility.

Also applies to: 14-14


56-61: LGTM!

The updated call to loadJsonFiles correctly uses the new directory structure (join(datasetPath, 'execution', 'input')) and maintains the same normalization logic with the updated return shape.


78-81: LGTM!

The batch processing correctly uses the new data property from the refactored loadJsonFiles return type.

frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/evaluateWithLangsmith.ts (5)

24-34: LGTM!

The schema definitions correctly validate executor types and options, with sensible defaults for numRepetitions and maxConcurrency. The use of Valibot for runtime validation aligns with the coding guidelines.


39-57: LGTM!

The argument parsing correctly extracts executor options from CLI args and validates them using the schema. The logic handles both flag-based and value-based arguments appropriately.


59-74: LGTM!

The target functions correctly wrap the executors and handle errors by throwing (which LangSmith will catch). The prompt extraction logic (input.prompt || input.input || '') provides good fallback handling.

Also applies to: 76-95


102-117: LGTM!

The evaluation setup correctly configures LangSmith's evaluate function with the dataset name, evaluator, experiment prefix, and execution options. The use of fromPromise properly wraps the async evaluation in a ResultAsync.


127-156: LGTM!

The main function correctly orchestrates the evaluation workflow: parsing options, resolving datasets, validating inputs, and handling errors. The separation of dataset and executor argument parsing is clean.

frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/cli/utils/loadJsonFiles.ts (3)

13-24: LGTM!

The function signature is well-designed with generic type parameters, making it reusable for different JSON file types. The updated documentation accurately reflects the generic purpose. The return type using data instead of input makes the function more versatile.


25-27: LGTM!

The directory existence check with a clear error message provides early validation. The generic error message is appropriate for a reusable utility.


29-70: LGTM!

The file loading, parsing, and validation logic is solid. The use of neverthrow for error handling provides type-safe error propagation throughout the function. The Valibot validation ensures runtime type safety, aligning with the coding guidelines.

import * as v from 'valibot'
import { evaluate } from '../evaluate/evaluate.ts'

const validateSchema = (data: unknown): Schema => v.parse(schemaSchema, data)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Add error handling to validateSchema.

The function uses v.parse, which throws on validation failure and would crash the evaluator instead of returning a graceful error. LangSmith evaluators should handle validation failures without throwing.

Consider using v.safeParse and handling validation errors explicitly:

-const validateSchema = (data: unknown): Schema => v.parse(schemaSchema, data)
+const validateSchema = (data: unknown): Schema => {
+  const result = v.safeParse(schemaSchema, data)
+  if (!result.success) {
+    throw new Error(`Schema validation failed: ${JSON.stringify(result.issues)}`)
+  }
+  return result.output
+}

Alternatively, return an error result from the evaluator when validation fails instead of throwing.

📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const validateSchema = (data: unknown): Schema => v.parse(schemaSchema, data)
const validateSchema = (data: unknown): Schema => {
const result = v.safeParse(schemaSchema, data)
if (!result.success) {
throw new Error(`Schema validation failed: ${JSON.stringify(result.issues)}`)
}
return result.output
}
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts
around line 7, validateSchema currently calls v.parse which throws on invalid
input; change it to use v.safeParse and handle the result so validation failures
do not throw. Specifically, call v.safeParse(schemaSchema, data), check success;
on failure map the validation errors into the evaluator's error/result shape (or
return a graceful error result) and on success return the parsed Schema value —
ensure the evaluator returns an error result rather than allowing an exception
to bubble up.

Comment on lines +27 to +28
const referenceSchema = validateSchema(args.referenceOutputs?.['schema'])
const outputSchema = validateSchema(args.outputs['schema'])
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue | 🟠 Major

Add null checks before schema validation.

The code accesses referenceOutputs?.['schema'] and outputs['schema'] without checking if the values exist. If either is undefined, validateSchema will throw.

Apply this diff to add null checks:

+  if (!args.referenceOutputs?.['schema']) {
+    throw new Error('Missing reference schema in referenceOutputs')
+  }
+  if (!args.outputs['schema']) {
+    throw new Error('Missing schema in outputs')
+  }
   const referenceSchema = validateSchema(args.referenceOutputs?.['schema'])
   const outputSchema = validateSchema(args.outputs['schema'])
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
const referenceSchema = validateSchema(args.referenceOutputs?.['schema'])
const outputSchema = validateSchema(args.outputs['schema'])
if (!args.referenceOutputs?.['schema']) {
throw new Error('Missing reference schema in referenceOutputs')
}
if (!args.outputs['schema']) {
throw new Error('Missing schema in outputs')
}
const referenceSchema = validateSchema(args.referenceOutputs?.['schema'])
const outputSchema = validateSchema(args.outputs['schema'])
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In frontend/internal-packages/schema-bench/src/langsmith/schemaEvaluator.ts
around lines 27-28, the code calls validateSchema on
referenceOutputs?.['schema'] and outputs['schema'] without ensuring those values
exist; add explicit null/undefined checks before calling validateSchema: verify
args.referenceOutputs and args.referenceOutputs['schema'] exist and verify
args.outputs and args.outputs['schema'] exist, and if missing either throw a
clear error (or handle fallback) instead of passing undefined into
validateSchema; then call validateSchema only with the confirmed non-null schema
values.

Copy link
Member

@sasamuku sasamuku left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM👍

@sasamuku sasamuku added this pull request to the merge queue Oct 10, 2025
Merged via the queue into main with commit e053496 Oct 10, 2025
33 checks passed
@sasamuku sasamuku deleted the feat/langsmith-integration branch October 10, 2025 03:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants