update: update main deps #345
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request consist of numerous updates across many components and pages that adjust CSS class names, import statements, and type definitions. These adjustments standardize styling—such as replacing instances of "flex-grow" with "grow", "focus:outline-none" with "focus:outline-hidden", and modifying shadow and z-index classes—and update configuration details in project files. Additionally, some type signatures and hook initializations were refined, dependency versions updated, and global theming configurations restructured. No business logic or functional behavior has been altered. Changes
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: CodeRabbit UI ⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
🔇 Additional comments (33)
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #345 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 53.83% 53.86% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 225 225
Lines 16620 16630 +10
==========================================
+ Hits 8947 8957 +10
Misses 7673 7673 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🔭 Outside diff range comments (1)
components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx (1)
153-236: 💡 Verification agent❓ Verification inconclusive
Consider adding test coverage for the modal component
Static analysis indicates that the updated lines are not covered by tests. Consider adding tests for this modal component to ensure its functionality is maintained through future updates.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any test files for the modal component find . -type f -name "*multiMfxMintModal*test*" -o -name "*MultiMintModal*test*" # Look for any existing test patterns for modals find . -type f -name "*modal*test*" | head -n 5Length of output: 132
Action Required: Add test coverage for the multiMfxMintModal component
The static analysis and subsequent searches show that there are no test files currently covering the modal component changes. Please add tests (e.g., unit and integration tests) to verify:
- The correct rendering of payout pairs (including address and amount fields).
- Proper display and behavior of error tooltips based on FieldProps meta properties.
- The functionality of the remove button (ensuring both the FieldArray remove and the custom removePayoutPair function are called as expected).
This will help ensure that future changes to this component do not break its expected functionality.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 153-153: components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx#L153
Added line #L153 was not covered by tests
[warning] 165-165: components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx#L165
Added line #L165 was not covered by tests
[warning] 189-189: components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx#L189
Added line #L189 was not covered by tests
[warning] 236-236: components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx#L236
Added line #L236 was not covered by tests
🧹 Nitpick comments (16)
components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx (1)
47-47: Styling enhancement for consistent modal widthThis addition of
panelClassName="max-w-4xl"standardizes the modal width, providing a more consistent user experience across the application. This aligns with the PR objective of addressing theming issues.Consider adding test coverage for this styling change to ensure visual consistency is maintained in future updates.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 47-47: components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx#L47
Added line #L47 was not covered by testscomponents/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx (1)
47-47: Consistent modal sizing for better UI alignmentAdding
panelClassName="max-w-4xl"ensures this modal has the same maximum width as other modals in the application, creating visual consistency. This is especially important since this modal contains forms that benefit from the additional width.Consider whether removing the explicit
style={{height: '100vh', width: '100vw'}}properties might be beneficial, as they could potentially conflict with the new max-width class. ThepanelClassNameapproach is generally preferred for styling in a component system.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 47-47: components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx#L47
Added line #L47 was not covered by testscomponents/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx (1)
25-25: Test coverage needed for updated button stylingStatic analysis indicates these modified lines aren't covered by tests.
Consider adding unit tests to verify the UI elements render correctly with the updated styling, particularly testing both light and dark mode appearances.
Also applies to: 30-30
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 25-25: components/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by testscomponents/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx (1)
17-17: Address TODO comment in the codeThere's a TODO comment that should be addressed: "find max mint amount from team for mfx. Find tx size limit for max payout pairs". Consider completing this task or creating an issue to track it.
Would you like me to help create a tracking issue for investigating the maximum mint amount and transaction size limits for payout pairs?
components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx (1)
107-107: Improved tab UI with animated indicator.Added a dynamic tab indicator that transitions smoothly between active states, improving the visual feedback when switching tabs. The background colors are now more specific with dark mode support (
bg-[#0000000A] dark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F]).Consider adding a transition for the tab text color as well to create an even smoother tab switching experience:
- className={`flex-1 py-2 px-4 text-sm font-medium rounded-xl focus:outline-hidden relative z-10 ${ - active ? 'text-[#161616] dark:text-white' : 'text-[#808080]' + className={`flex-1 py-2 px-4 text-sm font-medium rounded-xl focus:outline-hidden relative z-10 transition-colors duration-200 ${ + active ? 'text-[#161616] dark:text-white' : 'text-[#808080]'Also applies to: 109-113
styles/globals.css (9)
1-2: Custom Directive Usage: Verify Build Support for Non-standard At-Rules
The use of@import 'tailwindcss';is standard in this context; however, the subsequent@config '../tailwind.config.js';is a non-standard CSS directive. Ensure that your build pipeline (e.g., PostCSS or a custom Tailwind plugin) properly recognizes and processes this directive. If linters complain, consider adding a linter disable comment or moving the configuration into your standard Tailwind configuration file.
3-5: DaisyUI Plugin Setup: Confirm Linter Expectations
The block:@plugin "daisyui" { themes: false; }disables themes by default. Note that properties like
themes: false;may be flagged by static analysis tools as unknown properties. If these directives are valid per DaisyUI’s design, ensure you have configured your linter/postcss to ignore these custom at-rules or provide in-code comments to suppress false positives.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 4-4: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
7-60: Light Theme Configuration: Verify Custom Property Support and Syntax
This extensive block sets up the light theme using custom properties and directives (e.g.,name,default,prefersdark,color-scheme). Static analysis hints flag lines 8–10 (and possibly issues with the color functionoklch(97.02% 0 0)) as unknown. Although these may be part of DaisyUI’s extended syntax, please verify that your toolchain and browser support these notations. In case of issues, consider adding fallbacks or disabling the corresponding linter rules.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 8-8: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 9-9: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 10-10: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
62-121: Dark Theme Configuration: Linter Warnings and Compatibility Check
The dark theme block mirrors the light theme but with values suited for a dark palette. Similar to the light theme, properties such asname: 'dark';,default: false;, andprefersdark: true;may be flagged as unknown. Confirm that these settings are fully supported by your theming system and adjust your linter configuration if needed.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 63-63: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 64-64: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 65-65: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
123-124: Custom Variants: Ensure Tailwind CSS Compatibility
The custom variants defined as:@custom-variant dark (&:where([data-theme=dark], [data-theme=dark] *)); @custom-variant light (&:where([data-theme=light], [data-theme=light] *));provide a mechanism for theme-specific styling. Verify that your Tailwind CSS configuration and compiler (especially with Tailwind CSS v4) support this syntax. If any issues arise, you might need to adjust your configuration or add explanatory comments for future maintainers.
143-175: Utilities Layer: Autofill and Selection Styling
The utilities layer effectively sets styles for autofill states and text selection. The selectors and@mediaquery for autofill styling are appropriately scoped. Consider reviewing if the multiple declarations for-webkit-box-shadowcan be unified to reduce duplication, though they seem intentionally repeated for various states.
177-229: Root-Level Theme Variables: Avoiding Duplication
The:rootblock redefines many custom properties for the light theme. While this is clear and explicit, ensure these variables remain consistent with those set in the corresponding DaisyUI plugin block. Consolidating theme definitions might improve maintainability if similar values are declared in multiple places.
230-285: Dark Mode Overrides: Consistency Check Across Theme Declarations
The.darkblock establishes the dark theme overrides. The values here appear well defined. However, double-check that these do not conflict with or unnecessarily duplicate settings provided in the dark theme plugin block (lines 62–121).
328-347: Final Base Styles: Clear and Accessible Layouts
The base styles defined within the@layer basesection (lines 328–347) apply background and text colors via@apply. The rules forbody, links, and headings are straightforward. Just ensure that link hover states and heading contrasts meet accessibility standards.package.json (2)
38-95: Dependency Updates: Ensure Compatibility Across Major Upgrades
A number of dependencies have been updated (e.g.,@chain-registry/assets,@cosmos-kit/*,@fontsource/manrope,@heroicons/react,daisyui,decimal.js,next,octokit,postcss,react-confetti,react-icons,react-intersection-observer,react-scroll,tailwindcss, andyup). These updates are critical for leveraging recent features and security patches. Please ensure that you have reviewed each dependency's changelog for potential breaking changes and that all integration tests pass against these updates.
102-121: DevDependency Updates: Linting, Formatting, and TypeScript Enhancements
The devDependencies now include upgrades to packages like@tanstack/eslint-plugin-query,@testing-library/react,@types/identicon.js,@types/react,@types/react-dom,eslint-config-next,eslint-plugin-prettier,prettier, andtypescript. Double-check that these versions do not conflict with your existing ESLint and TypeScript configurations and that your codebase is updated to comply with any new rules introduced by these packages.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
bun.lockis excluded by!**/*.lock
📒 Files selected for processing (70)
components/3js/animatedMesh.tsx(1 hunks)components/admins/components/chainUpgrader.tsx(1 hunks)components/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx(1 hunks)components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx(4 hunks)components/admins/modals/cancelUpgradeModal.tsx(1 hunks)components/admins/modals/descriptionModal.tsx(1 hunks)components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx(4 hunks)components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx(4 hunks)components/admins/modals/upgradeModal.tsx(2 hunks)components/admins/modals/validatorModal.tsx(2 hunks)components/bank/components/historyBox.tsx(2 hunks)components/bank/components/sendBox.tsx(1 hunks)components/bank/components/tokenList.tsx(2 hunks)components/bank/forms/ibcSendForm.tsx(4 hunks)components/bank/forms/sendForm.tsx(3 hunks)components/bank/modals/txInfo.tsx(3 hunks)components/factory/components/DenomList.tsx(5 hunks)components/factory/forms/BurnForm.tsx(4 hunks)components/factory/forms/CreateDenom.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/forms/MintForm.tsx(5 hunks)components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx(1 hunks)components/factory/modals/TransferModal.tsx(3 hunks)components/factory/modals/denomInfo.tsx(2 hunks)components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx(2 hunks)components/groups/components/groupControls.tsx(2 hunks)components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx(5 hunks)components/groups/forms/groups/GroupDetailsForm.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/forms/groups/MemberInfoForm.tsx(2 hunks)components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx(3 hunks)components/groups/modals/tallyResults.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/modals/updateGroupModal.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/modals/voteModal.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/modals/voting/messagesModal.tsx(1 hunks)components/groups/utils.tsx(1 hunks)components/ibcTransferProgress.tsx(1 hunks)components/react/ModalDialog.tsx(1 hunks)components/react/authSignerModal.tsx(3 hunks)components/react/header.tsx(1 hunks)components/react/inputs/AddressInput.tsx(3 hunks)components/react/inputs/BaseInput.tsx(1 hunks)components/react/inputs/TextArea.tsx(1 hunks)components/react/modal.tsx(2 hunks)components/react/scrollableFade.tsx(1 hunks)components/react/sideNav.tsx(2 hunks)components/react/views/Connecting.tsx(1 hunks)components/react/views/Contacts.tsx(3 hunks)components/react/views/Error.tsx(2 hunks)components/react/views/NotExist.tsx(2 hunks)components/react/views/SMSInput.tsx(1 hunks)components/toast.tsx(1 hunks)components/wallet.tsx(5 hunks)contexts/manifestAppProviders.tsx(0 hunks)global.d.ts(1 hunks)hooks/useDelayResetState.ts(1 hunks)next.config.js(0 hunks)package.json(3 hunks)pages/404.tsx(1 hunks)pages/_app.tsx(2 hunks)pages/admins.tsx(1 hunks)pages/bank.tsx(6 hunks)pages/factory/create.tsx(1 hunks)pages/factory/index.tsx(4 hunks)pages/groups/create.tsx(1 hunks)pages/groups/index.tsx(2 hunks)pages/index.tsx(7 hunks)postcss.config.js(1 hunks)styles/Home.module.css(0 hunks)styles/globals.css(1 hunks)tailwind.config.js(4 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (3)
- next.config.js
- contexts/manifestAppProviders.tsx
- styles/Home.module.css
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (33)
- components/react/header.tsx
- components/groups/forms/groups/GroupDetailsForm.tsx
- components/factory/forms/CreateDenom.tsx
- components/react/scrollableFade.tsx
- components/groups/modals/updateGroupModal.tsx
- components/react/views/Connecting.tsx
- components/react/views/SMSInput.tsx
- components/react/sideNav.tsx
- components/bank/components/tokenList.tsx
- pages/groups/create.tsx
- components/react/views/Error.tsx
- hooks/useDelayResetState.ts
- pages/404.tsx
- components/factory/components/DenomList.tsx
- components/admins/modals/descriptionModal.tsx
- components/toast.tsx
- components/factory/modals/denomInfo.tsx
- components/groups/forms/groups/MemberInfoForm.tsx
- components/groups/components/groupControls.tsx
- pages/index.tsx
- components/groups/modals/voting/messagesModal.tsx
- components/groups/modals/tallyResults.tsx
- components/groups/modals/voteModal.tsx
- components/3js/animatedMesh.tsx
- components/react/ModalDialog.tsx
- components/factory/forms/MintForm.tsx
- components/groups/components/myGroups.tsx
- components/react/views/NotExist.tsx
- components/bank/forms/ibcSendForm.tsx
- pages/factory/create.tsx
- components/react/authSignerModal.tsx
- components/factory/forms/BurnForm.tsx
- components/react/views/Contacts.tsx
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (3)
components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx (1)
Learnt from: chalabi2
PR: liftedinit/manifest-app#128
File: components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T18:36:10.398Z
Learning: We will refactor modals to use a common modal base instead of consistently redefining the same code, and we will use Tailwind CSS rather than defining styles inline. This method was previously used while fixing lots of code.
components/admins/modals/upgradeModal.tsx (1)
Learnt from: chalabi2
PR: liftedinit/manifest-app#128
File: components/admins/modals/upgradeModal.tsx:273-292
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T17:28:45.961Z
Learning: In the Manifest App project, it's acceptable to use direct DOM manipulation methods like `querySelector`, `closest`, `focus`, and `blur` when necessary to override Daisy UI defaults, as seen in `components/admins/modals/upgradeModal.tsx`.
components/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx (1)
Learnt from: chalabi2
PR: liftedinit/manifest-app#128
File: components/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx:23-33
Timestamp: 2024-12-09T17:25:54.054Z
Learning: In `components/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx`, mint and burn operations submit proposals that require admin members' approval. Therefore, an additional confirmation step in the UI is not necessary.
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx
[warning] 47-47: components/factory/modals/MintModal.tsx#L47
Added line #L47 was not covered by tests
components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx
[warning] 47-47: components/factory/modals/BurnModal.tsx#L47
Added line #L47 was not covered by tests
components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx
[warning] 227-227: components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx#L227
Added line #L227 was not covered by tests
[warning] 250-250: components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx#L250
Added line #L250 was not covered by tests
[warning] 253-253: components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx#L253
Added line #L253 was not covered by tests
[warning] 294-294: components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx#L294
Added line #L294 was not covered by tests
components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx
[warning] 138-138: components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx#L138
Added line #L138 was not covered by tests
[warning] 202-202: components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx#L202
Added line #L202 was not covered by tests
components/admins/modals/upgradeModal.tsx
[warning] 234-234: components/admins/modals/upgradeModal.tsx#L234
Added line #L234 was not covered by tests
[warning] 241-241: components/admins/modals/upgradeModal.tsx#L241
Added line #L241 was not covered by tests
[warning] 323-323: components/admins/modals/upgradeModal.tsx#L323
Added line #L323 was not covered by tests
components/bank/modals/txInfo.tsx
[warning] 70-70: components/bank/modals/txInfo.tsx#L70
Added line #L70 was not covered by tests
components/factory/modals/TransferModal.tsx
[warning] 125-125: components/factory/modals/TransferModal.tsx#L125
Added line #L125 was not covered by tests
[warning] 168-168: components/factory/modals/TransferModal.tsx#L168
Added line #L168 was not covered by tests
components/admins/components/chainUpgrader.tsx
[warning] 43-43: components/admins/components/chainUpgrader.tsx#L43
Added line #L43 was not covered by tests
[warning] 50-50: components/admins/components/chainUpgrader.tsx#L50
Added line #L50 was not covered by tests
components/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx
[warning] 25-25: components/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by tests
[warning] 30-30: components/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by tests
components/admins/modals/cancelUpgradeModal.tsx
[warning] 97-97: components/admins/modals/cancelUpgradeModal.tsx#L97
Added line #L97 was not covered by tests
components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx
[warning] 125-125: components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx#L125
Added line #L125 was not covered by tests
[warning] 137-137: components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx#L137
Added line #L137 was not covered by tests
[warning] 162-162: components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx#L162
Added line #L162 was not covered by tests
[warning] 207-207: components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx#L207
Added line #L207 was not covered by tests
components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx
[warning] 153-153: components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx#L153
Added line #L153 was not covered by tests
[warning] 165-165: components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx#L165
Added line #L165 was not covered by tests
[warning] 189-189: components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx#L189
Added line #L189 was not covered by tests
[warning] 236-236: components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx#L236
Added line #L236 was not covered by tests
components/ibcTransferProgress.tsx
[warning] 112-112: components/ibcTransferProgress.tsx#L112
Added line #L112 was not covered by tests
components/react/modal.tsx
[warning] 551-551: components/react/modal.tsx#L551
Added line #L551 was not covered by tests
[warning] 562-562: components/react/modal.tsx#L562
Added line #L562 was not covered by tests
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
styles/globals.css
[error] 4-4: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 8-8: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 9-9: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 10-10: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 63-63: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 64-64: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 65-65: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (2)
- GitHub Check: build
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (90)
components/ibcTransferProgress.tsx (1)
112-112:✅ Verification successful
Updated to Tailwind CSS v4 syntax
This change from
flex-shrink-0toshrink-0brings the component in line with Tailwind CSS v4 naming conventions, which has simplified many class names. The functionality remains the same.
🌐 Web query:
What are the differences between flex-shrink-0 and shrink-0 in Tailwind CSS v4?💡 Result:
Tailwind CSS v4 simplifies utility class names, and this applies to flex-shrink utilities. The key differences between
flex-shrink-0andshrink-0are:1. Naming Convention Evolution
flex-shrink-0: Legacy class name used in Tailwind CSS v2 and earlier[8].shrink-0: Modern class name introduced in Tailwind CSS v3 and maintained in v4[1][6].2. Functionality
Both classes apply identical CSS properties:flex-shrink: 0; /* Prevents item from shrinking */The only difference is the class name itself, reflecting Tailwind's move toward shorter, more intuitive utility names in later versions[6][8].
3. Version Compatibility
Class Name Tailwind v2 Tailwind v3/v4 flex-shrink-0✓ ✗ shrink-0✗ ✓ Key Recommendation
In Tailwind CSS v4, always useshrink-0for new projects. Theflex-prefix was dropped from flex-shrink utilities to streamline class names while maintaining identical functionality[1][6]. Legacy projects using older Tailwind versions should migrate to the new syntax when upgrading.Citations:
- 1: https://kombai.com/tailwind/flex-shrink/
- 2: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/flex-shrink
- 3: https://www.tutorialspoint.com/tailwind_css/tailwind_css_flex_shrink.htm
- 4: https://windframe.dev/tailwind/classes/tailwind-flex-shrink
- 5: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/flex
- 6: https://v3.tailwindcss.com/docs/flex-shrink
- 7: https://tailscan.com/blog/tailwind-css-flex-a-quick-overview
- 8: https://v2.tailwindcss.com/docs/flex-shrink
- 9: No way to specify flex-basis css property in tailwind tailwindlabs/tailwindcss#603
- 10: https://www.dhiwise.com/post/everything-you-need-to-know-about-tailwind-flex
Update Verified: Tailwind CSS v4 Syntax
The change to using
shrink-0instead offlex-shrink-0is correct. As verified, both classes applyflex-shrink: 0, withshrink-0being the standard in Tailwind CSS v4 per current documentation.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 112-112: components/ibcTransferProgress.tsx#L112
Added line #L112 was not covered by testscomponents/admins/modals/cancelUpgradeModal.tsx (1)
97-97:✅ Verification successful
Updated focus styling for better accessibility
Changed from
focus:outline-nonetofocus:outline-hiddento align with Tailwind CSS v4 focus styling conventions. This maintains the intended visual appearance while potentially improving accessibility.
🌐 Web query:
What is the difference between focus:outline-none and focus:outline-hidden in Tailwind CSS v4?💡 Result:
In Tailwind CSS v4,
focus:outline-noneandfocus:outline-hiddenserve distinct purposes for handling element outlines, with key differences in behavior and accessibility:
focus:outline-hidden
- Function: Creates a transparent outline (
outline: 2px solid transparent) with a 2px offset, hiding the default browser outline while preserving visibility in forced-colors mode (e.g., Windows High Contrast Mode) [1][7][10].- Accessibility: Maintains accessibility compliance by ensuring focus indicators remain visible to users relying on assistive technologies [1][8][10].
- Use Case: Preferred when removing default outlines but retaining accessibility. Must pair with custom focus styling (e.g.,
focus:ring,focus:border) [1][7].
focus:outline-none
- Function: Completely removes the outline by setting
outline-style: none, eliminating all visible focus indicators [7][10].- Accessibility Risk: Can harm accessibility unless replaced with alternative focus styles (e.g.,
focus:ring,focus:shadow) [7][8][10].- Use Case: Only appropriate when implementing custom, accessible focus states from scratch [7][8].
Key Differences
Aspect outline-hiddenoutline-noneCSS Output outline: 2px solid transparentoutline-style: noneForced Colors Mode Visible (accessibility-safe) Hidden Upgrade Guidance Replaces outline-nonefrom Tailwind v3New in v4 for full outline removal [7] For most cases,
outline-hiddenis recommended to balance design and accessibility. Useoutline-nonesparingly and only with compensatory focus styling.Citations:
- 1: https://v3.tailwindcss.com/docs/outline-style
- 2: https://v1.tailwindcss.com/docs/outline
- 3: https://forum.devtalk.com/t/agile-web-development-with-rails-8-tailwind-4-minor-breaking-changes-whole-book-beta-3/186378
- 4: https://tailwind-search.barvian.me/docs/outline-style
- 5: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/outline-width
- 6: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/:focus-visible
- 7: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/upgrade-guide
- 8: https://sentry.io/answers/how-to-remove-focus-border-outline-around-text-input-boxes/
- 9: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/hover-focus-and-other-states
- 10: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/outline-style
Final Review: Verified Focus State Improvement
The update in line 97 ofcomponents/admins/modals/cancelUpgradeModal.tsxis correct. Changing fromfocus:outline-none(which completely removes focus indications) tofocus:outline-hidden(which applies a transparent outline while preserving accessibility in forced-colors mode) aligns with Tailwind CSS v4 recommendations and improves accessibility.
- Location:
components/admins/modals/cancelUpgradeModal.tsx(line 97)- Change: Replacing
focus:outline-nonewithfocus:outline-hidden- Rationale: The new class ensures that users relying on focus indicators, especially in high-contrast modes, continue to receive visual cues without relying on the default browser outline.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 97-97: components/admins/modals/cancelUpgradeModal.tsx#L97
Added line #L97 was not covered by testspostcss.config.js (1)
3-3:✅ Verification successful
Updated PostCSS configuration for Tailwind CSS v4
This change correctly updates the PostCSS configuration to use the new consolidated plugin approach required by Tailwind CSS v4. The
@tailwindcss/postcssplugin replaces the previous combination oftailwindcss,postcss-import, andautoprefixer.
🌐 Web query:
How does Tailwind CSS v4 handle PostCSS configuration compared to version 3?💡 Result:
Tailwind CSS v4 introduces significant changes to PostCSS configuration compared to v3, focusing on simplification and performance. Here's a breakdown of the key differences:
1. Dedicated PostCSS Package
In v4, Tailwind's PostCSS plugin moved to a separate package (@tailwindcss/postcss), requiring explicit installation instead of being bundled with the core library[1][4]. This replaces v3's approach wheretailwindcsswas directly used in PostCSS configurations[3].2. Simplified Configuration
v4 eliminates the need forpostcss-importandautoprefixerin most setups[1][10]. The new Oxide engine (written in Rust) handles vendor prefixing and import resolution internally[2][8], whereas v3 required these as separate PostCSS plugins[3][9].Example v3 PostCSS Config
// v3 configuration module.exports = { plugins: { tailwindcss: {}, autoprefixer: {}, } }Example v4 PostCSS Config
// v4 configuration export default { plugins: { '@tailwindcss/postcss': {} } }3. Installation Changes
- v3 Required:
npm install -D tailwindcss@3 postcss autoprefixer- v4 Requires:
npm install tailwindcss@next @tailwindcss/postcss@next[1][7]4. Performance Improvements
The Oxide engine in v4 provides:
- 5x faster builds[8]
- 35% smaller CSS output[8]
- Automatic vendor prefixing without
autoprefixer[2][10]5. Migration Steps
- Uninstall old dependencies:
npm uninstall tailwindcss postcss-cli autoprefixer- Install new packages:
npm install @tailwindcss/postcss @tailwindcss/cli[4][7]- Update configuration files to use the new PostCSS plugin[1][6]
Key Advantage: v4 reduces build tool complexity while improving performance, handling what previously required multiple PostCSS plugins through its optimized engine[2][8][10]. Developers can now achieve equivalent or better results with simpler configurations compared to v3's multi-plugin approach[1][10].
Citations:
- 1: https://blog.logrocket.com/getting-ready-tailwind-v4/
- 2: https://dev.to/qa3emnik/tailwind-css-v4-whats-new-and-why-its-a-game-changer-29d
- 3: https://v3.tailwindcss.com/docs/installation/using-postcss
- 4: https://daily.dev/blog/tailwind-css-40-everything-you-need-to-know-in-one-place
- 5: https://egghead.io/lessons/tailwind-set-up-tailwind-and-postcss
- 6: https://dev.to/sirneij/tailwindcss-v40-upgrading-from-v3-with-some-plugins-572f
- 7: https://rsbuild.dev/guide/basic/tailwindcss
- 8: https://tailkit.com/blog/everything-you-need-to-know-about-tailwind-css-v4
- 9: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/using-with-preprocessors
- 10: https://peerlist.io/blog/engineering/whats-new-with-tailwind-css-v4
Configuration Update Approved
The updated PostCSS configuration inpostcss.config.jscorrectly adopts the new Tailwind CSS v4 approach. By switching from multiple plugins to the consolidated@tailwindcss/postcsspackage, this change reflects the simplified setup and performance improvements introduced in v4. No further modifications are required.
- Verify that any references to
tailwindcss,postcss-import, andautoprefixerelsewhere in the project are removed or updated accordingly.components/react/inputs/BaseInput.tsx (1)
48-49: Updated variant ordering for better compatibility with Tailwind CSS v4The reordering of the Tailwind CSS variants (
dark:beforeautofill:andfocus:) follows the recommended pattern in Tailwind CSS v4 for proper specificity in the compiled CSS.components/bank/components/sendBox.tsx (1)
120-120:❓ Verification inconclusive
Adjusted component heights for improved layout
The height adjustment (decreasing to
h-[430px]for regular send and increasing toh-[635px]for cross-chain) helps accommodate layout changes resulting from the Tailwind CSS update.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for any references to the old height values in other files echo "Checking for related height values across the codebase..." rg "h-\[450px\]|h-\[630px\]" --type tsxLength of output: 194
Please run the above script to verify that there are no stray references to the previous height values. Once you’ve confirmed that the search returns no unwanted matches across all TSX files, the adjustments in components/bank/components/sendBox.tsx (line 120) can be considered correctly implemented for the Tailwind CSS update.
Rewritten Review Comment:
Review Verification: Layout Height Updates in sendBox.tsx
The updates from
h-[450px]/h-[630px]toh-[430px]for the regular send andh-[635px]for the cross-chain view are correctly applied per the new Tailwind CSS styling requirements. Please run the verification script above to ensure there are no residual references to the old height values in any TSX files. Confirm that these changes fully accommodate the new layout adjustments.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash echo "Checking for old height values (h-[450px] and h-[630px]) in all .tsx files..." rg "h-\[450px\]|h-\[630px\]" -g "*.tsx"Length of output: 206
Review Verification: Layout Component Height Adjustments
The updated heights in components/bank/components/sendBox.tsx (i.e.,
h-[430px]for regular send andh-[635px]for cross-chain) appear to be correctly implemented based on the new Tailwind CSS requirements. A search for the old values (h-[450px]andh-[630px]) usingrgdid not show any matches. However, since no output was produced by the verification script, please manually confirm that there are no occurrences of these deprecated height values across the codebase.
- Action Required: Manually verify the absence of
h-[450px]andh-[630px]in all relevant TSX files.components/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx (2)
25-25: Added explicit text color for consistent button stylingAdding
text-whiteto the primary button ensures consistent text coloring across light and dark themes.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 25-25: components/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx#L25
Added line #L25 was not covered by tests
30-30:❓ Verification inconclusive
Standardized text color for error button
Changed from conditional text coloring to consistent white text for the error button in both light and dark modes.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for similar button styling patterns that might need to be updated echo "Checking for similar button patterns across the codebase..." rg "btn btn-(primary|error) flex-1" --type tsx -A 1 -B 1Length of output: 215
Action Required: Confirm Uniform Error Button Text Color Update
The change in
components/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx(line 30) now consistently applies white text for the error button in both light and dark modes, which aligns with our design standard. However, the original verification script using the--type tsxflag did not work as expected (returned “unrecognized file type: tsx”). To ensure consistency across the codebase, please run the following command manually to search for similar button styling:rg --glob '*.tsx' "btn btn-(primary|error) flex-1" -A 1 -B 1Review the results to confirm that all similar button patterns use the standardized text color.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 30-30: components/admins/components/stakeHolderPayout.tsx#L30
Added line #L30 was not covered by testscomponents/react/inputs/TextArea.tsx (1)
26-27: CSS class order adjusted for proper dark mode stylingThe changes correctly fix the CSS class order for proper precedence in dark mode styles. This adjustment moves the
dark:variant outside of the:pseudo-class selectors (autofill and focus), which is the correct pattern for Tailwind CSS v4.pages/admins.tsx (2)
30-30: Simplified container stylingRemoving the
min-h-screen lg:py-0 py-4 px-2classes simplifies the container styling. This change aligns with modern layout practices by relying more on parent containers for spacing and padding.
32-32: Updated flex utility to Tailwind v4 syntaxReplaced
flex-growwithgrow, which is the preferred utility in Tailwind CSS v4.components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx (5)
125-125: Updated flex utility to Tailwind v4 syntaxReplaced
flex-growwithgrow, which is the preferred utility in Tailwind CSS v4.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 125-125: components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx#L125
Added line #L125 was not covered by tests
137-137: Updated flex utility to Tailwind v4 syntaxReplaced
flex-growwithgrow, which is the preferred utility in Tailwind CSS v4.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 137-137: components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx#L137
Added line #L137 was not covered by tests
162-162: Updated flex utility to Tailwind v4 syntaxReplaced
flex-growwithgrow, which is the preferred utility in Tailwind CSS v4.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 162-162: components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx#L162
Added line #L162 was not covered by tests
207-207: Updated focus outline utility to Tailwind v4 syntaxReplaced
focus:outline-nonewithfocus:outline-hidden, which is the recommended approach in Tailwind CSS v4 for hiding outlines.For reference, this is part of the broader dependency update mentioned in the PR objectives.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 207-207: components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx#L207
Added line #L207 was not covered by tests
125-207:❓ Verification inconclusive
Consider adding test coverage for the modal component
Static analysis indicates that the updated lines are not covered by tests. Consider adding tests for this modal component to ensure its functionality is maintained through future updates.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if there are any test files for the modal component find . -type f -name "*multiMfxBurnModal*test*" -o -name "*MultiBurnModal*test*" # Look for any existing test patterns for modals find . -type f -name "*modal*test*" | head -n 5Length of output: 132
Action Required: Add test coverage for the modal component
It appears that no tests are currently associated with the
multiMfxBurnModal.tsxcomponent. Static analysis indicates that changes within this file aren’t covered by any tests, which could expose the component to regressions in future updates. Please add comprehensive tests—including checks for rendering, input interactions, error states, and removal logic—to ensure its functionality is maintained. Verify if tests exist in any non-standard locations and update the coverage accordingly.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 125-125: components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx#L125
Added line #L125 was not covered by tests
[warning] 137-137: components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx#L137
Added line #L137 was not covered by tests
[warning] 162-162: components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx#L162
Added line #L162 was not covered by tests
[warning] 207-207: components/admins/modals/multiMfxBurnModal.tsx#L207
Added line #L207 was not covered by testscomponents/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx (4)
153-153: Updated flex utility to Tailwind v4 syntaxReplaced
flex-growwithgrow, which is the preferred utility in Tailwind CSS v4.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 153-153: components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx#L153
Added line #L153 was not covered by tests
165-165: Updated flex utility to Tailwind v4 syntaxReplaced
flex-growwithgrow, which is the preferred utility in Tailwind CSS v4.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 165-165: components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx#L165
Added line #L165 was not covered by tests
189-189: Updated flex utility to Tailwind v4 syntaxReplaced
flex-growwithgrow, which is the preferred utility in Tailwind CSS v4.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 189-189: components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx#L189
Added line #L189 was not covered by tests
236-236: Updated focus outline utility to Tailwind v4 syntaxReplaced
focus:outline-nonewithfocus:outline-hidden, which is the recommended approach in Tailwind CSS v4 for hiding outlines.For reference, this is part of the broader dependency update mentioned in the PR objectives.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 236-236: components/admins/modals/multiMfxMintModal.tsx#L236
Added line #L236 was not covered by testscomponents/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx (2)
138-138: Modal width enhancement matches design standards.Adding
panelClassName="max-w-4xl"appropriately widens the modal to accommodate the form fields more comfortably, creating a better user experience for this data-dense form.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 138-138: components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx#L138
Added line #L138 was not covered by tests
202-202: Tailwind CSS 4 focus style update.Changing from
focus:outline-nonetofocus:outline-hiddenaligns with Tailwind CSS 4's improved focus state handling, which better supports accessibility standards by using the newer attribute.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 202-202: components/factory/modals/updateDenomMetadata.tsx#L202
Added line #L202 was not covered by testscomponents/admins/modals/validatorModal.tsx (2)
99-103: Consistent modal sizing implementation.Adding
panelClassName="max-w-4xl"maintains consistency with other modals in the application, creating a uniform experience across the UI. The prop formatting is also cleaner.
112-112: Tailwind CSS 4 flex utility update.Replacing
flex-growwith the more concisegrowutility follows Tailwind CSS 4's streamlined class naming conventions, resulting in cleaner markup without changing functionality.components/react/modal.tsx (2)
551-551: Z-index syntax modernization.Updating
z-[9999]toz-9999adopts Tailwind CSS 4's improved arbitrary value syntax, which now supports numeric z-indices without square brackets for standard values.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 551-551: components/react/modal.tsx#L551
Added line #L551 was not covered by tests
562-562: Background opacity syntax update and blur removal.Changing from
bg-black bg-opacity-50 backdrop-blur-sm transition-opacitytobg-black/40 transition-opacityuses the more concise opacity notation in Tailwind CSS 4 and removes the blur effect for a cleaner overlay.Note that this slightly changes the visual appearance by:
- Reducing opacity from 50% to 40%
- Removing the blur effect entirely
This appears intentional as part of the theming update.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 562-562: components/react/modal.tsx#L562
Added line #L562 was not covered by testscomponents/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx (4)
227-227: Standardized focus handling for inputs.Updating from
focus:outline-nonetofocus:outline-hiddenaligns with accessibility improvements in Tailwind CSS 4 and creates consistency with other input elements throughout the application.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 227-227: components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx#L227
Added line #L227 was not covered by tests
250-250: Simplified flex growth utility.Replacing
flex-growwithgrowfollows Tailwind CSS 4's more concise utility naming pattern without changing the layout behavior.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 250-250: components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx#L250
Added line #L250 was not covered by tests
253-253: Consistent focus state treatment for address inputs.Applying
focus:outline-hiddeninstead offocus:outline-nonemaintains accessibility standards while ensuring visual consistency with other form elements in the application.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 253-253: components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx#L253
Added line #L253 was not covered by tests
294-294: Updated cancel button focus state.This change ensures consistent focus styling across all button elements, maintaining visual harmony while following Tailwind CSS 4 conventions.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 294-294: components/groups/modals/memberManagementModal.tsx#L294
Added line #L294 was not covered by testscomponents/admins/components/chainUpgrader.tsx (2)
43-43: Color consistency update with new themingThe addition of
text-whiteensures text is properly visible on the primary button, which aligns with the theming updates in the PR.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 43-43: components/admins/components/chainUpgrader.tsx#L43
Added line #L43 was not covered by tests
50-50: Text color standardization for error buttonsChanged from
text-blacktotext-whiteto maintain consistent text coloring for error buttons, improving visual consistency across the application.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 50-50: components/admins/components/chainUpgrader.tsx#L50
Added line #L50 was not covered by testscomponents/bank/components/historyBox.tsx (3)
68-68: Simplified container stylingRemoved rounded corners and padding classes to align with updated styling guidelines. The removal of
rounded-[24px]andpx-2 sm:px-4creates a cleaner, more modern appearance that's consistent with Tailwind CSS 4 design patterns.
116-116: Improved responsive layout with full widthAdded
w-fullto ensure the container properly fills its parent, improving responsive behavior across different screen sizes.
120-120: Flexible height for transaction itemsRemoving the
min-h-[105px]constraint allows the transaction items to size naturally based on their content, creating a more responsive design that adapts better to varying content lengths.global.d.ts (1)
1-13: Added TypeScript support for React Three FiberThe global declarations extend React's JSX intrinsic elements with
ThreeElementsfrom @react-three/fiber, enabling proper TypeScript type checking for 3D rendering components. This is a necessary addition for working with Three.js components in a type-safe manner.The Window interface declaration maintains compatibility with the Keplr wallet integration.
components/admins/modals/upgradeModal.tsx (3)
234-234: Subtle shadow adjustment for dropdownChanged from
shadowtoshadow-smto create a more subtle, modern appearance for the dropdown menu. This aligns with updated Tailwind CSS 4 styling conventions.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 234-234: components/admins/modals/upgradeModal.tsx#L234
Added line #L234 was not covered by tests
241-241: Updated focus styling for search inputChanged from
focus:outline-nonetofocus:outline-hiddento align with Tailwind CSS 4's updated focus utility classes. This maintains accessibility while providing a cleaner visual appearance.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 241-241: components/admins/modals/upgradeModal.tsx#L241
Added line #L241 was not covered by tests
323-323: Updated focus styling for cancel buttonChanged from
focus:outline-nonetofocus:outline-hiddento maintain consistency with the updated focus styling pattern across the application. This standardization improves UI consistency.Using direct DOM manipulation methods in the dropdown interaction (as seen in the unchanged code around lines 261-266) aligns with the project's established patterns for overriding Daisy UI defaults when necessary.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 323-323: components/admins/modals/upgradeModal.tsx#L323
Added line #L323 was not covered by testscomponents/bank/modals/txInfo.tsx (4)
35-35: Z-index class standardization looks good.The change from
z-[999]toz-999aligns with Tailwind CSS best practices for using standard utility classes instead of arbitrary values when possible.
37-37: Z-index class standardization looks good.Similar to the previous change, the standardization from
z-[1000]toz-1000improves consistency in the codebase.
70-70: Empty button requires accessibility consideration.The button is now empty which may impact accessibility. If this button is intended to close the modal, consider adding an aria-label attribute to describe its purpose.
-<button></button> +<button aria-label="Close modal"></button>The static analysis tool also flagged this line as not covered by tests. Consider adding test coverage for this interaction.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 70-70: components/bank/modals/txInfo.tsx#L70
Added line #L70 was not covered by tests
87-87: Background color adjustment for improved contrast.The background color change from
dark:bg-[#FFFFFF1A]todark:bg-[#FFFFFF0F]reduces the opacity in dark mode, which should improve readability while maintaining the visual hierarchy.components/bank/forms/sendForm.tsx (4)
131-132: Increased vertical spacing improves form readability.Changing from
space-y-6tospace-y-8provides more breathing room between form elements, improving the overall visual hierarchy and readability of the form.
170-170: Lighter shadow for dropdown content.The change from
shadowtoshadow-smcreates a more subtle elevation effect for the dropdown, aligning with modern UI design trends that favor subtler depth cues.
271-271: Spacing adjustment between form fields and submit button.Removing the
mt-6class eliminates the extra margin above the button container. This works well with the increasedspace-y-8spacing applied to the form, creating a more balanced layout.
177-177:❓ Verification inconclusive
Focus style change may affect accessibility.
The change from
focus:outline-nonetofocus:outline-hiddenis better for accessibility as it doesn't completely remove the outline, but verify that focus states remain visible and accessible for keyboard users.
🌐 Web query:
What's the difference between outline-none and outline-hidden in Tailwind CSS for accessibility?💡 Result:
In Tailwind CSS,
outline-noneandoutline-hiddenboth control focus outlines but differ significantly in accessibility behavior:
outline-none
- Removes the outline completely by setting
outline-style: none[1][9].- Accessibility Risk: Eliminates the default browser focus ring, which can make keyboard navigation unusable if no alternative focus indicator is provided[1][7].
- Recommended Usage: Only use when explicitly adding custom focus styling (e.g.,
focus:ringorfocus:border)[1][9]:<input class="focus:outline-none focus:ring-2 focus:ring-blue-500">
outline-hidden
- Hides the visual outline using a transparent style (
outline: 2px solid transparent) while preserving accessibility in forced-colors mode (e.g., Windows High Contrast Mode)[3][9].- Accessibility Benefit: Maintains a detectable outline for assistive technologies and forced-colors users[3][9].
- Recommended Usage: Safer default for hiding outlines when modifying focus styles:
<button class="focus:outline-hidden focus:bg-blue-100"> Save Changes </button>Key Accessibility Comparison
Utility Visual Removal Forced-Colors Support Requires Custom Focus Style outline-noneComplete ❌ No ✔️ Yes (mandatory) outline-hiddenPartial ✔️ Yes ✔️ Recommended For accessibility compliance, never use either utility without providing an alternative focus indicator like:
- Custom borders (
focus:border-2)- Background changes (
focus:bg-blue-100)- Box shadows (
focus:ring)[4][5][9].In Tailwind v4+,
outline-hiddenreplaces v3'soutline-nonebehavior, while the newoutline-nonebecomes more destructive to accessibility[3][9]. Always verify focus states with keyboard navigation and forced-colors emulation[9].Citations:
- 1: https://v3.tailwindcss.com/docs/outline-style
- 2: https://tailkits.com/blog/conditional-visibility-tailwind-hidden-display-utilities/
- 3: [v4] :focus-visible no longer overrides default outline for some reason tailwindlabs/tailwindcss#15152
- 4: https://jmperezperez.com/blog/outline-focus-ring-a11y/
- 5: https://kombai.com/tailwind/outline-style/
- 6: https://blogs.purecode.ai/blogs/css-outline
- 7: https://www.tpgi.com/how-to-remove-css-outlines-in-an-accessible-manner/
- 8: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/visibility
- 9: https://tailwindcss.com/docs/outline-style
- 10: https://dockyard.com/blog/2024/05/28/creating-an-accessible-toggle-switch-in-tailwindcss
Action Required: Verify Visible Keyboard Focus
The change to
focus:outline-hiddenis an improvement overfocus:outline-nonesince it preserves forced-colors focus support. However, with the current use offocus:ring-0, there is no alternative focus indicator provided. Please verify that a clear, visible focus state is available for keyboard users—if not, consider adding an alternative style (such as a non-zero focus ring or border) to ensure proper accessibility.
- File:
components/bank/forms/sendForm.tsx(Line 177)- Current Focus Styles:
focus:outline-hiddenandfocus:ring-0- Action: Confirm via keyboard navigation testing that focus states are sufficiently visible, or update by adding a visible focus indicator.
pages/factory/index.tsx (5)
98-98: Updated to modern Tailwind shorthand.Changing from
flex-growtogrowuses the newer Tailwind CSS shorthand, making the code more consistent with Tailwind's current conventions.
122-122: Focus style change for improved consistency.The change from
focus:outline-nonetofocus:outline-hiddenaligns with the pattern used elsewhere in the application. This provides a more consistent focus state handling throughout the UI.
131-131: Vertical spacing adjustment.Removing the
mt-4margin affects the spacing between the search area and token list. This change works well with the overall layout adjustments, creating a cleaner and more consistent vertical rhythm.
96-96:❓ Verification inconclusive
Simplified container styling.
Removing
min-h-screen lg:py-0 py-4 px-2classes simplifies the container styling. However, ensure this doesn't negatively impact the page layout on different screen sizes, particularly regarding the minimum height and padding requirements.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check for other min-h-screen usage in similar page layouts rg "min-h-screen" --type tsx --type jsx "pages/"Length of output: 74
Review Update: Verify Container Styling Simplification
The change in
pages/factory/index.tsxsimplifies the container styling by removingmin-h-screen lg:py-0 py-4 px-2. Before finalizing this change, please verify manually (or with the corrected script above) that no other pages rely on these classes for ensuring proper minimum height and responsive padding. If they do, evaluate if the layout might be adversely affected on different screen sizes.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Corrected search for "min-h-screen" in .tsx and .jsx files within the pages directory rg -g '*.tsx' -g '*.jsx' "min-h-screen" pages/Length of output: 427
Container Styling Simplification – Verify Layout Impact
In
pages/factory/index.tsx, the container styling was simplified by removingmin-h-screen lg:py-0 py-4 px-2, resulting in:<div className="relative mx-auto text-white">Since other pages (e.g.,
pages/index.tsxandpages/_app.tsx) still use themin-h-screenclass to ensure a full viewport height and manage responsive padding, please double-check that this removal in the factory page doesn’t negatively affect its layout across various screen sizes. Consider verifying that:
- The absence of
min-h-screendoesn’t cause the page to collapse vertically where a minimum height is expected.- Removing the padding classes doesn’t lead to insufficient spacing, especially on mobile or small screens.
108-108:❓ Verification inconclusive
Padding removal may affect content spacing.
Removing the
p-1padding could affect the spacing of content within this container. Verify that the elements inside this div still have appropriate spacing and don't appear too cramped.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check how this component renders with and without padding rg -A 10 -B 5 "relative w-full h-full overflow-hidden" --type tsx --type jsxLength of output: 106
Verify Spacing Impact of Padding Removal
The update in
pages/factory/index.tsxat line 108 removed thep-1padding from the container:<div className="relative w-full h-full overflow-hidden scrollbar-hide">This change might affect the spacing of child elements. Please manually verify that the content within this div maintains adequate spacing throughout the UI. In particular, inspect the affected container in various responsive layouts to ensure the removal has not led to a cramped appearance.
- File: pages/factory/index.tsx
- Focus: Ensure the container and its children have sufficient spacing despite the removal of the
p-1class.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Re-run search for the removed padding class "p-1" in pages/factory/index.tsx rg "p-1" pages/factory/index.tsxLength of output: 258
Action Required: Verify UI Spacing in Updated Container
- File:
pages/factory/index.tsx(around line 108)- The
<div className="relative w-full h-full overflow-hidden scrollbar-hide">now lacks the previously appliedp-1padding.- Although our search confirms that the
p-1class is removed in this container (the only padding-related classes found elsewhere are unrelated, e.g.,p-12), this change might affect the layout if the child elements rely on that spacing.Please manually inspect the UI—across various responsive breakpoints—to ensure that the removal of padding has not resulted in a cramped appearance or disrupted the intended spacing between elements.
pages/_app.tsx (4)
7-7: Added theme context hook.The addition of the
useThemehook allows for dynamic theme management, which is excellent for improving the application's dark/light mode support.
19-28: Improved component architecture.Refactoring to use the
AppContentcomponent simplifies the mainManifestAppfunction and enables proper theme context usage. This is a good architectural improvement that separates concerns appropriately.
31-36: Well-structured props interface.The
AppContentPropsinterface clearly defines the expected props for theAppContentcomponent, making the component API explicit and well-documented.
38-66: Enhanced theme implementation.The
AppContentcomponent now properly applies theme classes based on the current theme state. This implementation correctly:
- Uses the
useThemehook within the provider context- Dynamically applies the
darkclass for Tailwind dark mode- Sets the
data-themeattribute for component-level themingThis approach provides a solid foundation for consistent theming across the application.
components/wallet.tsx (5)
4-4: Type imports simplificationThis change simplifies the React import to only include the specifically used types and functions, which is in line with modern React practices.
44-44: Improved type safety for timeoutRefUpdating the ref type to explicitly include
nulland initializing it withnullimproves type safety and prevents potential undefined behavior when checking if the timeout exists.
139-139: Updated Tailwind class from 'flex-grow' to 'grow'The class has been updated from
flex-growtogrowto align with Tailwind CSS v4 naming conventions, which uses shorter utility class names.
163-163: Updated focus utility classChanged from
focus:outline-nonetofocus:outline-hiddento align with the updated utility naming in newer Tailwind/DaisyUI versions. This maintains the same functionality while using the updated class names.
278-278: Broadened icon prop typeChanged the type from
JSX.ElementtoReact.ReactNodeto allow for more flexibility in what can be passed as an icon, supporting not just JSX elements but also strings, numbers, and other React node types.components/groups/utils.tsx (1)
21-21: Expanded return type to React.ReactNodeChanged the return type from
JSX.Element | undefinedtoReact.ReactNode | undefinedto provide more flexibility in what the function can return. This is a good practice as it aligns with React's broader type system and allows for returning not just JSX elements but also other valid React nodes.components/react/inputs/AddressInput.tsx (5)
41-41: Removed unnecessary flex stylingThe
flex gap-2class has been removed, simplifying the container styling. Since there are only conditional elements within this div, the flex layout may not be necessary.
46-46: Adjusted button text color classAdded a space before
text-whiteto ensure proper class separation. This is a minor formatting improvement that ensures the class will be correctly applied.
59-59: Increased dialog z-index for better stackingThe z-index has been increased from
z-1toz-999, which will help ensure the dialog appears above other elements in the UI. This change is likely part of standardizing z-index usage across the application.
70-70: Added maximum width constraint to dialog panelAdded
max-w-xlclass to the Dialog.Panel to constrain its maximum width, improving the user experience by ensuring the modal doesn't become too wide on larger screens.
69-69:❓ Verification inconclusive
Removed background styling from modal backdrop
The semi-transparent black background (
bg-black/30) has been removed from the modal backdrop. This could affect the visual contrast between the modal and the content behind it.
🌐 Web query:
Does Tailwind CSS v4 or DaisyUI v5 handle modal backdrops differently than previous versions?💡 Result:
Tailwind CSS v4 and daisyUI v5 introduce notable changes to modal backdrop handling compared to previous versions. Here's a technical breakdown of the key differences:
## Tailwind CSS v4 Modal Backdrops
CSS-First Configuration
- Backdrop styles are now defined through CSS variables rather than JavaScript configuration[7]
- Enables direct customization in CSS files:
@theme { --backdrop-opacity: 0.5; --backdrop-color: oklch(0 0 0); }- Uses modern
color-mix()for dynamic opacity adjustments[3][8]Performance Improvements
- Backdrop rendering leverages new CSS features for better performance
- No longer requires separate opacity utilities (
bg-opacity-50)[7][10]## daisyUI v5 Modal Changes
OKLCH Color Space
- Backdrop colors use OKLCH instead of HSL/RGB:
.modal-backdrop { background-color: oklch(var(--n)/var(--tw-bg-opacity)); }- Enables 30% wider color gamut support[8]
CSS Variable Sizing
- Backdrop dimensions controlled through CSS variables:
:root { --modal-backdrop-blur: 8px; --modal-backdrop-z-index: 40; }- Allows unified component sizing[3][9]
Simplified Interaction
- Static backdrops use pure CSS approach:
<div data-modal-backdrop="static" class="modal">- No longer requires JavaScript for persistent backdrops[4][6]
Key Differences from Previous Versions
Tailwind v3/daisyUI v3 Tailwind v4/daisyUI v5 Color System HSL/RGB OKLCH[8] Configuration JS config CSS variables[7][9] Opacity Handling Utility classes color-mix()[3][8] Browser Support Legacy fallbacks Modern browsers only[8] Customization Limited CSS-level control[4][7] These changes enable more consistent backdrop styling across themes while improving performance through modern CSS features. Developers can now achieve complex backdrop effects like gradient overlays and dynamic blur without additional JavaScript[3][6][10].
Citations:
- 1: https://flowbite.com/docs/components/modal/
- 2: https://daisyui.com/docs/themes/
- 3: https://daisyui.com/blog/daisyui-5-upcoming-changes/
- 4: https://flyonui.com/docs/overlays/modal/
- 5: https://blog.logrocket.com/daisyui-adoption-guide/
- 6: Suggestions, feedback and ideas for daisyUI v5 beta saadeghi/daisyui#3246
- 7: https://tailwindcss.com/blog/tailwindcss-v4
- 8: https://classic.yarnpkg.com/en/package/daisyui
- 9: https://scottspence.com/posts/theme-switching-in-sveltekit-updated-for-daisyui-v5-and-tailwind-v4
- 10: https://daily.dev/blog/tailwind-css-40-everything-you-need-to-know-in-one-place
Modal Backdrop Styling Verification
The explicitbg-black/30was removed on line 69 in favor of relying on the updated CSS-first configuration introduced in Tailwind CSS v4 and daisyUI v5. These versions now manage modal backdrops via CSS variables (e.g., using OKLCH colors and customizable opacity) rather than fixed utility classes. Please verify that the fallback CSS variable definitions (or any custom configuration in your project) continue to provide adequate visual contrast between the modal and the underlying content. If the new backdrop styling does not meet your design requirements, consider reintroducing an explicit background styling class or adjusting the CSS variable settings.pages/groups/index.tsx (4)
5-5: Updated component importsRemoved the
IfWalletConnectedimport as it's no longer used, keeping only the necessary components (GroupsIconandWalletNotConnected).
12-12: Added isWalletConnected to chain hook destructuringNow explicitly destructures
isWalletConnectedfrom theuseChainhook, which will be used for conditional rendering instead of the previousIfWalletConnectedcomponent.
27-29: Simplified container stylingRemoved unnecessary classes from the container elements and changed
flex-growtogrowto align with Tailwind CSS v4 naming conventions.
31-52: Improved conditional rendering logicReplaced the
IfWalletConnectedcomponent wrapper with direct conditional rendering using theisWalletConnectedstate. This approach is more explicit and reduces component nesting, making the code easier to follow.The logic flow is now clearer:
- First check if wallet is connected
- Then check for loading state
- Then check for errors
- Finally check if there are groups, or render the no groups found state
This change maintains the same functionality while improving code readability.
components/factory/modals/TransferModal.tsx (3)
114-115: Improved modal sizing with panelClassName.The addition of
panelClassName="max-w-4xl"provides a consistent maximum width for the modal dialog, which enhances UI consistency across different screen sizes.
168-168: Updated focus outline style for better consistency.Changed from
focus:outline-nonetofocus:outline-hiddento maintain consistency with the updated Tailwind CSS v4 and DaisyUI v5 standards for focus states.🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 168-168: components/factory/modals/TransferModal.tsx#L168
Added line #L168 was not covered by tests
125-125:❓ Verification inconclusive
Empty div class might lose intended styling.
The div previously had specific styling classes for appearance and layout, but now has an empty className. This might lead to inconsistent styling or layout issues if the component is relying on these classes.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Checking if similar changes were made to other modal components # and if there's a parent component providing these styles echo "Checking for similar div class changes in other modal components:" rg -A 1 -B 1 'className=""' --glob="components/factory/modals/*.tsx" echo "Checking if SigningModalDialog provides these styles:" rg -A 10 'function SigningModalDialog' --glob="components/**/*.tsx"Length of output: 728
Attention: Verify Styling in TransferModal Component
It appears the
<div className="">in components/factory/modals/TransferModal.tsx has lost previously applied styling classes. Since our search shows this pattern is isolated to this file (and no alternative styling from a parent like SigningModalDialog was detected), please confirm that the removal was intentional. If this change was unintentional, consider restoring the original classes to prevent potential layout or appearance issues.
- Verify if the intended styling is provided elsewhere (e.g., through a parent or global styles).
- If not, restore the appropriate styling classes on this div to ensure consistent design behavior.
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
[warning] 125-125: components/factory/modals/TransferModal.tsx#L125
Added line #L125 was not covered by teststailwind.config.js (3)
4-4: Content paths simplified after DaisyUI update.The content paths have been simplified by removing DaisyUI's JavaScript files from the node_modules directory, which is appropriate since DaisyUI v5 likely has a different structure or doesn't require these paths anymore.
90-90: Updated gradient values for button styles.The gradient values for disabled button states have been explicitly defined, which improves consistency in the button appearance across states.
Also applies to: 134-134
72-77:✅ Verification successful
Removed DaisyUI theme configuration and plugins.
The DaisyUI theme configuration and plugins have been removed, which is consistent with upgrading to DaisyUI v5. Verify that the theming is now handled elsewhere in the application to avoid unintended styling issues.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if DaisyUI themes are configured elsewhere echo "Checking for DaisyUI theme configuration in other files:" rg -A 5 "daisyui" --glob="*.{js,ts,json}" echo "Checking for theme configuration in CSS files:" rg -A 5 "theme" --glob="styles/*.css"Length of output: 2233
DaisyUI theming configuration has been successfully shifted to CSS.
- Verified that DaisyUI is still included in the project (version ^5.0.0 in package.json).
- Confirmed that theme configuration now exists in styles/globals.css via
@plugin "daisyui/theme"blocks which set up both light and dark themes.This change is consistent with the DaisyUI v5 upgrade and should prevent any unintended styling issues.
pages/bank.tsx (6)
9-9: Added theme context integration.The addition of the theme context hook allows the component to be aware of the current theme, which is essential for proper theming after the DaisyUI upgrade.
Also applies to: 31-31
181-181: Updated focus state styling.Changed from
focus:outline-nonetofocus:outline-hiddento maintain consistency with the updated Tailwind CSS v4 and DaisyUI v5 focus state styling conventions.
185-185: Improved theme-aware icon styling.The search icon now uses
text-secondary-content/50which provides better contrast and visibility in both light and dark themes.
261-262: Implemented theme-aware text colors.Text colors have been updated to use theme-aware variables (
text-base-content) instead of hard-coded colors, improving theme consistency across light and dark modes.Also applies to: 264-265, 281-282, 284-285
155-155:✅ Verification successful
Simplified layout classes.
The layout classes have been simplified, removing
min-h-screenand padding classes. This could affect the component's layout, especially on different screen sizes.Also applies to: 158-158, 166-166
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if these styling changes are compensated elsewhere echo "Checking for layout classes in parent components or global CSS:" rg "min-h-screen" --glob="*.{css,tsx}" rg "grow" --glob="styles/*.css" echo "Checking if similar changes were made to other page components:" rg -A 1 "relative.*mx-auto" --glob="pages/*.tsx"Length of output: 1100
Simplified Layout Classes Update Verified
The removal of
min-h-screenand padding classes inpages/bank.tsxis consistent with intentional layout simplifications seen throughout the codebase. Similar changes are implemented inpages/admins.tsx, and global layout styles (e.g., inpages/_app.tsxandpages/index.tsx) continue to applymin-h-screenwhere needed. Please ensure that these adjustments align with the overall design and responsiveness requirements.
- Verified global styles:
min-h-screenis still applied in main layouts (e.g.,pages/_app.tsx,pages/index.tsx).- Consistent page styling: Other pages (e.g.,
pages/admins.tsx) follow the same simplified layout convention.
191-191:✅ Verification successful
Updated tab styling class.
Changed from
tabs-borderedtotabs-borderto comply with the DaisyUI v5 class naming conventions.
🌐 Web query:
What are the tab class changes in DaisyUI v5 compared to previous versions?💡 Result:
DaisyUI v5 introduced significant changes to tab components, restructuring class names and improving accessibility. Here are the key changes compared to previous versions:
Class Structure Modifications
Container-level styling
Modifiers now apply to parenttabscontainer instead of individualtabelements:<!-- v5 --> <div class="tabs tabs-lifted tabs-lg"> <!-- Previous --> <div class="tabs"> <a class="tab tab-lifted tab-lg">Removed individual tab modifiers
These classes were eliminated fromtabelements:
tab-liftedtab-borderedtab-lg/tab-md/tab-sm/tab-xsNew container-based sizing
Size classes now apply to parent container:<div class="tabs tabs-xs"> <!-- xs/sm/md/lg -->Technical Improvements
Layout engine
Switched from flexbox to CSS grid for tab containers [10]Pseudo-element simplification
Reduced from 2 pseudo-elements (:beforeand:after) to single:before[10]Accessibility enhancements
Native radio input support with ARIA labels:<input type="radio" name="my_tabs" role="tab" class="tab" aria-label="Tab 1" checked> <div role="tabpanel" class="tab-content">Content</div>New Features
State management
Addedtab-activemodifier for active state styling [10]Content panels
Introduced dedicatedtab-contentclass for tab content sections:<div class="tab-content bg-base-100 p-6">These changes reduce class redundancy, improve semantic markup, and align with modern CSS practices while maintaining backward compatibility through updated class structure [1][10]. Developers should update tab implementations to use container-level modifiers and the new content panel system for proper functionality in v5.
Citations:
- 1: https://v5.daisyui.com/components/tab/
- 2: https://daisyui.com/blog/daisyui-2023-wrapped/
- 3: https://scottspence.com/posts/theme-switching-in-sveltekit-updated-for-daisyui-v5-and-tailwind-v4
- 4: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/saadeghi/daisyui/refs/heads/v5/packages/docs/src/routes/(routes)/docs/v5/+page.md?plain=1
- 5: https://daisyui.com/blog/daisyui-5-upcoming-changes/
- 6: Suggestions, feedback and ideas for daisyUI v5 beta saadeghi/daisyui#3246
- 7: https://daisyui.com/docs/intro/
- 8: https://daisyui.com
- 9: https://v5.daisyui.com
- 10: https://daisyui.com/docs/changelog/
Tab Styling Updated Correctly for DaisyUI v5
The change from using
tabs-borderedtotabs-borderis in line with the new container-based naming conventions introduced in DaisyUI v5. The updated class setup now applies the correct styling at the container level (combined withtabs-lgfor sizing), which aligns with the framework’s revised approach.Please double-check any additional layout overrides (such as
flex flex-row) to ensure they’re intentional, considering DaisyUI v5 now leverages CSS grid for tab containers.components/admins/components/validatorList.tsx (4)
96-96: Updated focus state styling for better consistency.Changed from
focus:outline-nonetofocus:outline-hiddento maintain consistency with the updated Tailwind CSS v4 and DaisyUI v5 focus state styling conventions.
125-132: Added accessibility attributes to tab controls.Added proper ARIA attributes (
role="tab",aria-selected,aria-controls) to the pending tab button, improving accessibility for screen reader users.
211-211: Updated focus state styling for table rows.Changed from
focus:outline-nonetofocus:outline-hiddento maintain consistency with the updated Tailwind CSS v4 and DaisyUI v5 focus state styling conventions.
83-83:❓ Verification inconclusive
Removed padding from main container.
The padding has been removed from the main container, which could affect the spacing and layout of the component.
🏁 Script executed:
#!/bin/bash # Check if padding is applied elsewhere echo "Checking if padding is applied in parent components:" rg -A 2 "h-full flex flex-col" --glob="components/**/*.tsx"Length of output: 2062
Action Required: Verify Layout Spacing in ValidatorList
The main container in
components/admins/components/validatorList.tsxnow uses<div className="h-full flex flex-col">without any explicit padding. Our verification confirms that no padding class is applied here, which differs from some other components (e.g.,components/groups/components/myGroups.tsxadds agap-4). Please review the design guidelines to ensure this removal is intentional and that the overall spacing and layout remain consistent.styles/globals.css (2)
133-141: Base Layer Styles: Default Border Color Application
The base styles defined in the@layer baseblock apply a defaultborder-colorusing the custom propertyvar(--color-gray-200, currentColor). This approach is clear and helps maintain consistency but verify that no conflicts exist with other border color utilities in your project.
289-324: Inline Theme Mappings: Confirming Variable Consistency
The@theme inlineblock maps CSS custom properties to their respective theme variables, ensuring runtime consistency. This is a sound approach; verify that all expected properties are correctly mapped and that subsequent style adjustments reflect these inline definitions.package.json (2)
8-8: Development Script Update: Turbopack Flag Addition
The"dev": "next dev --turbopack"script now enables the Turbopack flag. Confirm that your development environment is set up to work with Turbopack and that any potential incompatibilities with existing Next.js configurations have been addressed.
31-32: Type Resolution Updates: Verify Compatibility with React 19
The resolutions for"@types/react"and"@types/react-dom"have been updated to"19.0.10"and"19.0.4", respectively. Verify that these version bumps are fully compatible with your current React version and that no breaking type changes have been introduced.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking good, thanks! Overall, it looks good; no complaints—minor stuff.
-
We have 3 ways of expressing disabled fields. We should standardize this. I prefer 2.
- Boxed, disabled.
- No box, disabled.
- No box, with icon
- Boxed, disabled.
-
The validator modal margins are big compared to other modals.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (7)
styles/globals.css (7)
1-7: Confirm Custom Directives and External Imports
The file starts by using non-standard CSS directives such as@import,@config, and@pluginwhich are likely processed by Tailwind CSS/DaisyUI’s build pipeline. Note that static analysis flags lines 4 (themes: false;) and 5 (exclude: rootcolor;) as unknown properties. If these directives are intended for configuration in your preprocessor, it would be helpful to add a brief comment clarifying that these are custom directives.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 4-4: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 5-5: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
8-61: Verify Light Theme Plugin Block Configuration
Within this daisyUI theme block for the light theme, non-standard properties such asname,default, andprefersdark(lines 9–11) are flagged by static analysis (e.g. “unknown property is not allowed”). Ensure that your build and processing tools (Tailwind CSS/DaisyUI) are configured to recognize and handle these custom directives. Also, note the use of the CSS color functionoklch(line 24); while this is supported in modern browsers, consider any required fallbacks for broader compatibility.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 9-9: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 10-10: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 11-11: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
124-125: Review Custom Variant Declarations
The declarations using@custom-variantfor both dark and light themes are non-standard CSS constructs. Ensure that your Tailwind configuration (or other tooling) supports these custom variants. Adding a short comment explaining their purpose might reduce future confusion.
134-168: Examine Base Layer Styles (First Block)
The first@layer baseblock (lines 134–168) applies global resets and base styles—for example, settingborder-coloron various elements and stylinghtml, body, links, and headings. The structure is clear; however, if similarbodyor link styles are defined later, consider consolidating them to reduce redundancy.
204-256: Assess :root Theme Variable Definitions for Light Theme
The:rootblock (lines 204–256) defines an extensive set of CSS custom properties for the light theme. The variables are well organized and follow a consistent naming pattern. For maintainability, if theme definitions become more complex in the future, consider splitting them into separate files or using a dedicated theming structure.
316-351: Evaluate Inline Theme Mappings
The@theme inlineblock (lines 316–351) maps previously defined theme variables using the CSSvar()function. This approach centralizes theme values but consider whether fallback values might be needed in cases where a variable isn’t defined. A short inline comment summarizing the purpose of this mapping could also boost clarity for future maintainers.
355-374: Revisit Additional Base Layer Styles – Potential Overlap
A second@layer baseblock (lines 355–374) sets styles forbody, links, and headings. While the intent is clear (to enforce base styles like background and text colors), having multiple base layer declarations could lead to conflicts or unexpected overrides in the final CSS cascade. Consider consolidating these with earlier base styles to maintain clarity and avoid duplication.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
styles/globals.css(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
styles/globals.css
[error] 4-4: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 5-5: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 9-9: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 10-10: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 11-11: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 64-64: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 65-65: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 66-66: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.
(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
- GitHub Check: build
🔇 Additional comments (3)
styles/globals.css (3)
63-123: Validate Dark Theme Plugin Block Configuration
Similar to the light theme, the dark theme block (lines 63–123) uses the custom propertiesname,default, andprefersdark(lines 64–66) that are flagged by static analysis. Confirm that these properties are correctly interpreted by your custom CSS preprocessor. Also, verify the syntax and compatibility for the use of theoklchfunction on line 80.🧰 Tools
🪛 Biome (1.9.4)
[error] 64-64: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 65-65: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
[error] 66-66: Unknown property is not allowed.
See CSS Specifications and browser specific properties for more details.
To resolve this issue, replace the unknown property with a valid CSS property.(lint/correctness/noUnknownProperty)
170-202: Review Utilities Layer for Autofill and Selection Styles
The@layer utilitiesblock (lines 170–202) handles autofill styling for inputs (including hover, focus, active states) and defines styles for text selection and a toast container. The multiple selectors forinput:-webkit-autofillensure comprehensive coverage. Verify that these selectors work as expected across browsers, particularly since vendor-specific pseudo-classes can be inconsistent.
260-312: Review Dark Theme Variable Definitions
The.darkblock (lines 260–312) provides overrides for dark theme variables. Ensure that these variables mirror the structure and naming of the light theme (:root) to avoid inconsistencies. This separation is clear; just double-check to make certain that the intended overrides apply without conflicts.
Summary
This PR updates Next -> 15.2.1 Tailwind -> v4 DaisyUI -> v5
We also fix various themeing issues and update some styles
Related #246
Summary by CodeRabbit