[CIR][CodeGen] Adds constraints to inline assembly #351
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
lanza
force-pushed
the
main
branch
2 times, most recently
from
05ffb2a to
34fceae
Compare
bcardosolopes
requested changes
Jan 4, 2024
|
✅ With the latest revision this PR passed the C/C++ code formatter. |
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 29, 2024
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try. Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process. 1) In this PR we introduce operand's constraints and the task is to collect them (and maybe transform a little) 2) There are two big functions copy-pasted from the traditional `Codegen` and I doubt they need to be reviewed. 3) We still don't do anything CIR-specific. Basically, we just work with strings in the same way like traditional `Codegen` does. 4) We just iterate over the input and output operands and collect the constraints 5) We still follow to the traditional `CodeGen` and don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of the `buildStmt`. Also, I renamed `AsmDialect` to `AsmFlavor` as you asked in #326
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 23, 2024
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try. Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process. 1) In this PR we introduce operand's constraints and the task is to collect them (and maybe transform a little) 2) There are two big functions copy-pasted from the traditional `Codegen` and I doubt they need to be reviewed. 3) We still don't do anything CIR-specific. Basically, we just work with strings in the same way like traditional `Codegen` does. 4) We just iterate over the input and output operands and collect the constraints 5) We still follow to the traditional `CodeGen` and don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of the `buildStmt`. Also, I renamed `AsmDialect` to `AsmFlavor` as you asked in #326
eZWALT
pushed a commit
to eZWALT/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2024
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try. Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process. 1) In this PR we introduce operand's constraints and the task is to collect them (and maybe transform a little) 2) There are two big functions copy-pasted from the traditional `Codegen` and I doubt they need to be reviewed. 3) We still don't do anything CIR-specific. Basically, we just work with strings in the same way like traditional `Codegen` does. 4) We just iterate over the input and output operands and collect the constraints 5) We still follow to the traditional `CodeGen` and don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of the `buildStmt`. Also, I renamed `AsmDialect` to `AsmFlavor` as you asked in llvm#326
eZWALT
pushed a commit
to eZWALT/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 24, 2024
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try. Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process. 1) In this PR we introduce operand's constraints and the task is to collect them (and maybe transform a little) 2) There are two big functions copy-pasted from the traditional `Codegen` and I doubt they need to be reviewed. 3) We still don't do anything CIR-specific. Basically, we just work with strings in the same way like traditional `Codegen` does. 4) We just iterate over the input and output operands and collect the constraints 5) We still follow to the traditional `CodeGen` and don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of the `buildStmt`. Also, I renamed `AsmDialect` to `AsmFlavor` as you asked in llvm#326
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try. Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process. 1) In this PR we introduce operand's constraints and the task is to collect them (and maybe transform a little) 2) There are two big functions copy-pasted from the traditional `Codegen` and I doubt they need to be reviewed. 3) We still don't do anything CIR-specific. Basically, we just work with strings in the same way like traditional `Codegen` does. 4) We just iterate over the input and output operands and collect the constraints 5) We still follow to the traditional `CodeGen` and don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of the `buildStmt`. Also, I renamed `AsmDialect` to `AsmFlavor` as you asked in #326
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try. Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process. 1) In this PR we introduce operand's constraints and the task is to collect them (and maybe transform a little) 2) There are two big functions copy-pasted from the traditional `Codegen` and I doubt they need to be reviewed. 3) We still don't do anything CIR-specific. Basically, we just work with strings in the same way like traditional `Codegen` does. 4) We just iterate over the input and output operands and collect the constraints 5) We still follow to the traditional `CodeGen` and don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of the `buildStmt`. Also, I renamed `AsmDialect` to `AsmFlavor` as you asked in #326
eZWALT
pushed a commit
to eZWALT/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try. Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process. 1) In this PR we introduce operand's constraints and the task is to collect them (and maybe transform a little) 2) There are two big functions copy-pasted from the traditional `Codegen` and I doubt they need to be reviewed. 3) We still don't do anything CIR-specific. Basically, we just work with strings in the same way like traditional `Codegen` does. 4) We just iterate over the input and output operands and collect the constraints 5) We still follow to the traditional `CodeGen` and don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of the `buildStmt`. Also, I renamed `AsmDialect` to `AsmFlavor` as you asked in llvm#326
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Apr 29, 2024
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try. Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process. 1) In this PR we introduce operand's constraints and the task is to collect them (and maybe transform a little) 2) There are two big functions copy-pasted from the traditional `Codegen` and I doubt they need to be reviewed. 3) We still don't do anything CIR-specific. Basically, we just work with strings in the same way like traditional `Codegen` does. 4) We just iterate over the input and output operands and collect the constraints 5) We still follow to the traditional `CodeGen` and don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of the `buildStmt`. Also, I renamed `AsmDialect` to `AsmFlavor` as you asked in #326
bruteforceboy
pushed a commit
to bruteforceboy/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2024
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try. Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process. 1) In this PR we introduce operand's constraints and the task is to collect them (and maybe transform a little) 2) There are two big functions copy-pasted from the traditional `Codegen` and I doubt they need to be reviewed. 3) We still don't do anything CIR-specific. Basically, we just work with strings in the same way like traditional `Codegen` does. 4) We just iterate over the input and output operands and collect the constraints 5) We still follow to the traditional `CodeGen` and don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of the `buildStmt`. Also, I renamed `AsmDialect` to `AsmFlavor` as you asked in llvm#326
Hugobros3
pushed a commit
to shady-gang/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 2, 2024
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try. Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process. 1) In this PR we introduce operand's constraints and the task is to collect them (and maybe transform a little) 2) There are two big functions copy-pasted from the traditional `Codegen` and I doubt they need to be reviewed. 3) We still don't do anything CIR-specific. Basically, we just work with strings in the same way like traditional `Codegen` does. 4) We just iterate over the input and output operands and collect the constraints 5) We still follow to the traditional `CodeGen` and don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of the `buildStmt`. Also, I renamed `AsmDialect` to `AsmFlavor` as you asked in llvm#326
keryell
pushed a commit
to keryell/clangir
that referenced
this pull request
Oct 19, 2024
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try. Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process. 1) In this PR we introduce operand's constraints and the task is to collect them (and maybe transform a little) 2) There are two big functions copy-pasted from the traditional `Codegen` and I doubt they need to be reviewed. 3) We still don't do anything CIR-specific. Basically, we just work with strings in the same way like traditional `Codegen` does. 4) We just iterate over the input and output operands and collect the constraints 5) We still follow to the traditional `CodeGen` and don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of the `buildStmt`. Also, I renamed `AsmDialect` to `AsmFlavor` as you asked in llvm#326
lanza
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Nov 5, 2024
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try. Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process. 1) In this PR we introduce operand's constraints and the task is to collect them (and maybe transform a little) 2) There are two big functions copy-pasted from the traditional `Codegen` and I doubt they need to be reviewed. 3) We still don't do anything CIR-specific. Basically, we just work with strings in the same way like traditional `Codegen` does. 4) We just iterate over the input and output operands and collect the constraints 5) We still follow to the traditional `CodeGen` and don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of the `buildStmt`. Also, I renamed `AsmDialect` to `AsmFlavor` as you asked in #326
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The next step for inline assembly. Sorry, maybe it looks too big on the first glance. And it's kind of hard to extract something well-grained from the code and introduce it as a separate PR, but I try.
Actually there is nothing really interesting done here, and the next will (I hope :) ) simplify your review process.
Codegenand I doubt they need to be reviewed.Codegendoes.CodeGenand don't do anything new, except a separate function that collects constraints infos in the very beginning of thebuildStmt.Also, I renamed
AsmDialecttoAsmFlavoras you asked in #326