Skip to content

Remove project title from README - #205

Closed
lyonzin wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
lyonzin-patch-1
Closed

lyonzin wants to merge 1 commit into
masterfrom
lyonzin-patch-1

Conversation

@lyonzin

@lyonzin lyonzin commented Aug 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Removed the project title 'knowledge-rag' from the README.

Summary

Closes #

Type of change

  • feat — new feature
  • fix — bug fix
  • docs — documentation only
  • refactor — no behavior change
  • perf — performance improvement
  • test — adding or improving tests
  • chore — tooling, deps, CI
  • BREAKING CHANGE (explain in Migration section below)

What changed

Why


7 Pillars Quality Gate

Mark each item. CI enforces these via the quality-gate.yml workflow.

1. Security

  • No new secrets, tokens, or credentials in the diff (gitleaks will block)
  • No new use of eval, exec, subprocess shell=True, pickle.loads on untrusted input, or arbitrary deserialization
  • New dependencies (if any) reviewed for known CVEs and license compatibility
  • Path traversal, command injection, and SSRF surfaces explicitly considered for any new I/O code

2. Stability

  • All existing tests still pass on Linux + Windows × Python 3.11/3.12
  • New behavior covered by tests; tests are deterministic (no time.sleep / network / OS-scheduler dependencies)
  • Coverage does not regress (codecov gate)
  • No tests were skipped, deleted, or marked xfail to make the PR pass

3. Memory leak

  • Long-lived objects (orchestrator, watcher, cache) are bounded
  • New caches have eviction policy (LRU, TTL, or explicit size limit)
  • No new global state that grows unbounded with usage
  • If you added a new module that loads heavy resources, consider lazy initialization

4. Versatility

  • Works on Linux, Windows, macOS (paths, line endings, locale considered)
  • Works on Python 3.11, 3.12, 3.13 (no Python-version-specific syntax without fallback)
  • No hardcoded paths, locales, or encodings (use pathlib.Path, encoding="utf-8" explicit)
  • If you touched a parser, all 20 supported formats still parse correctly

5. Scalability

  • No O(n²) or worse algorithms on user-controlled inputs
  • Benchmark impact considered (run pytest bench/ locally if you touched search/index/embed)
  • If perf regression > 10% in any metric, justification provided below
  • Concurrency safety: no new shared mutable state without lock or documented thread confinement

Performance impact (required if you touched mcp_server/server.py, mcp_server/ingestion.py, or bench/):

metric          before    after    delta
search p95      ___ ms    ___ ms   ___%
index docs/sec  ___       ___      ___%
RSS @ 1k docs   ___ MB    ___ MB   ___%

6. Versioning

  • If this is user-facing change: bumped version in pyproject.toml, mcp_server/__init__.py, and npm/package.json atomically
  • If this is a breaking change: bumped MAJOR, added migration notes in CHANGELOG, marked BREAKING CHANGE: in commit footer
  • CHANGELOG updated with entry under ## Unreleased in README.md
  • Public API surface (mcp_server/server.py MCP tool decorators) unchanged, OR breaking changes documented

7. Quality

  • ruff check passes
  • ruff format --check passes
  • Type hints on new public functions (mypy --strict clean for new files)
  • Docstrings on new public functions (used by interrogate)
  • Cyclomatic complexity reasonable (radon cc --max=C)
  • No dead code (vulture would not flag new code)
  • PR is reasonably sized (< 500 lines of diff preferred; bigger PRs split or justify)

Migration / Breaking changes

N/A

Test plan

  • pytest tests/ -v passed locally
  • pre-commit run --all-files clean
  • Manual smoke test:

Documentation

  • Updated README.md (if user-facing)
  • Updated docs/ (if applicable)
  • Added entry to ## Unreleased in README CHANGELOG section

Reviewer checklist

  • Reviewed line-by-line
  • Verified the 7 pillars CI status checks are green
  • Verified no obvious adversarial implications
  • Approved performance impact

By submitting this PR I confirm I read CONTRIBUTING.md and agree to the Code of Conduct.

Greptile Summary

Removes the redundant visible project-title heading from the README while retaining the banner, metadata, badges, and descriptive content.

  • Deletes the # knowledge-rag heading below the project banner.

Confidence Score: 5/5

The PR appears safe to merge because it only removes a redundant README heading.

The documentation remains coherent, and the change does not affect code, configuration, links, or runtime behavior.

Important Files Changed

Filename Overview
README.md Removes a single redundant H1 heading without affecting documentation links, metadata, or runtime behavior.

Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "Remove project title from README" | Re-trigger Greptile

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Removed the redundant top-level project heading from the README for a cleaner presentation beneath the banner image.

Removed the project title 'knowledge-rag' from the README.
@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Aug 23, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

No actionable comments were generated in the recent review. 🎉

ℹ️ Recent review info
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 3f7fa64c-5c48-4334-bdac-f8027fdb5415

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between c6213aa and d6730e5.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
  • README.md

Included review availability: Your plan provides up to 2 included reviews per hour; 1 remains after this review.


📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README no longer contains the top-level knowledge-rag heading before the centered badge block.

Changes

README cleanup

Layer / File(s) Summary
Remove the top-level README heading
README.md
Removed the # knowledge-rag heading before the centered badge block.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Merge Risk: ⚪ Minimal · up to d6730

This change only removes a redundant project-title heading from the README and does not affect runtime behavior, links, or configuration; no actionable merge-blocking risk remains.

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and concisely describes the README change to remove the project title.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check. Docstring coverage is scoped to functions touched by this diff. Analyzed 0 functions across 0 files.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed Check skipped because no linked issues were found for this pull request.
✨ Finishing Touches 💡 1
🛠️ Fix failing CI checks 💡
  • Create stacked PR
  • Commit on current branch
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Commit unit tests in branch lyonzin-patch-1

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

@lyonzin lyonzin closed this Sep 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant