You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
According to its docstring, the function word_select(offset, width) of the class nmigen.hdl.ast.Value should return the slice [offset*width:(offset+1):width] of the Value subject. It returns such an expected result in simulation (using PySim), but does not when used on an actual platform, such as the ECP5 Versa evaluation board.
Steps to reproduce the issue
Prepare the following nMigen script:
importargparseimportosfromnmigenimport*fromnmigen.backimportpysimfromnmigen_boards.versa_ecp5importVersaECP5PlatformclassDebug(Elaboratable):
def__init__(self, simulate):
self.simulate=simulatedefelaborate(self, platform):
m=Module()
ifself.simulate:
leds=Signal(8)
else:
cd_sync=ClockDomain(reset_less=True)
m.domains+=cd_syncm.d.comb+=cd_sync.clk.eq(platform.request("clk100").i)
leds= [platform.request("led", i).oforiinrange(8)]
dummy=Signal(8)
# Note: on the board I'm using, the LED outputs seem to be inverted# e.g. leds[0].eq(1) --> LED#0 turns OFF# e.g. leds[0].eq(0) --> LED#0 turns ON# Using word_selectm.d.comb+= [
dummy.word_select(0, 2).eq(~0b00),
dummy.word_select(1, 2).eq(~0b10),
dummy.word_select(2, 2).eq(~0b11),
dummy.word_select(3, 2).eq(~0b01)
]
# Using slicesm.d.comb+= [
dummy[0:2].eq(~0b00),
dummy[2:4].eq(~0b10),
dummy[4:6].eq(~0b11),
dummy[6:8].eq(~0b01)
]
m.d.sync+= [
leds[i].eq(dummy[i]) foriinrange(0, 8)
]
returnmif__name__=="__main__":
parser=argparse.ArgumentParser()
parser.add_argument("--simulate", action="store_true")
build_dir="./result"args=parser.parse_args()
platform=VersaECP5Platform()
top=Debug(args.simulate)
ifargs.simulate:
os.makedirs(build_dir, exist_ok=True)
withpysim.Simulator(top,
vcd_file=open(os.path.join(build_dir, "debug.vcd"), "w"),
gtkw_file=open(os.path.join(build_dir, "debug.gtkw"), "w")) assim:
sim.add_clock(1e-6)
sim.run_until(1000e-6, run_passive=True)
else:
platform.build(top, build_dir=build_dir)
Comment out the block starting with the comment line "Using slices". Now we are testing with word_select.
Under an environment with nMigen 0.1rc1 and other necessary tools (such as nextpnr, Trellis and OpenOCD) properly installed, run the script with Python. Add --simulate as the argument to see the VCD from simulation.
Use OpenOCD to program the ECP5 board, given that a working Config file is ready (see the example versa.cfg from HeavyX's README). For example, use the following command after building the bitstream:
The LEDs lights up like below (inverted bit pattern == 11101100):
Now, repeat Step 2 but instead of commenting out the "Using slices" block, comment out the "Using word_select" this time. Now we are testing with slicing.
Repeat Steps 3 and 4.
The LEDs lights up like below (inverted bit pattern == 01111000):
Comparison between Actual and Expected Results
If we compare the simulation result (i.e. VCDs) from the two scenarios, they are the same and as expected (bit pattern == 10000111 == 01111000 inverted (due to LED polarity issue)):
However, the actual LED result when using word_select() is inconsistent with the simulation result, as revealed in the picture of Step 5.
Using LED is just an example to quickly show this issue. I have actually encountered the issue when using word_select() to grab slices over in nmigen-soc (link). So maybe it is a potential bug in nMigen?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The balls are attached to the low side of the LEDs (writing 1 would turn them off unless the board layer inverts), so perhaps the issue with nmigen soc is different?
@ld-cd Hi! Could you please re-phrase your question? I see that the ECP5 Versa board defines that the LEDs light up when the balls are driven low, but I don't understand its correlation to nmigen-soc. Thanks.
Oh, I was just mentioning that the inverted bit pattern you are seeing could be because of the way they are wired, leaving anything funky you mentioned you had happen with nmigen soc as a result of something else.
Issue description
According to its docstring, the function
word_select(offset, width)
of the classnmigen.hdl.ast.Value
should return the slice [offset
*width
:(offset
+1):width
] of theValue
subject. It returns such an expected result in simulation (using PySim), but does not when used on an actual platform, such as the ECP5 Versa evaluation board.Steps to reproduce the issue
Prepare the following nMigen script:
Comment out the block starting with the comment line "Using slices". Now we are testing with
word_select
.Under an environment with nMigen 0.1rc1 and other necessary tools (such as nextpnr, Trellis and OpenOCD) properly installed, run the script with Python. Add
--simulate
as the argument to see the VCD from simulation.Use OpenOCD to program the ECP5 board, given that a working Config file is ready (see the example versa.cfg from HeavyX's README). For example, use the following command after building the bitstream:
The LEDs lights up like below (inverted bit pattern == 11101100):
Now, repeat Step 2 but instead of commenting out the "Using slices" block, comment out the "Using word_select" this time. Now we are testing with slicing.
Repeat Steps 3 and 4.
The LEDs lights up like below (inverted bit pattern == 01111000):
Comparison between Actual and Expected Results
If we compare the simulation result (i.e. VCDs) from the two scenarios, they are the same and as expected (bit pattern == 10000111 == 01111000 inverted (due to LED polarity issue)):
However, the actual LED result when using
word_select()
is inconsistent with the simulation result, as revealed in the picture of Step 5.Using LED is just an example to quickly show this issue. I have actually encountered the issue when using
word_select()
to grab slices over in nmigen-soc (link). So maybe it is a potential bug in nMigen?The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: