Add badge coverage #3
Conversation
macalbert
had a problem deploying
to
github-pages
GitHub Actions
Failure
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request involve modifications to the GitHub Actions workflow for code coverage, updates to the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (5)
.github/workflows/coverage-report.yml (1)
Line range hint
1-87: Overall workflow improvements with suggestion for optimizationThe changes to this workflow file align well with the PR objectives of adding coverage badges. The modifications provide better control over when the coverage job runs, particularly for Dependabot PRs. The structure is logical and the new badge generation step enhances the visibility of code coverage.
To further optimize the workflow, consider the following suggestion:
- Combine the conditions for running the job into a single, comprehensive check at the job level. This would simplify the workflow and reduce redundancy. Here's an example:
jobs: build-coverage: # ... other job configurations ... if: | !github.event.pull_request.draft && github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' && github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]' steps: # ... steps without individual conditions ... - name: Publish Results Badge uses: wjervis7/[email protected] if: success() || failure() with: result-type: lines upload-badge: trueThis change would maintain the same logic while simplifying the workflow structure.
README.md (4)
3-4: Great addition of badges!The Coverage Status badge aligns perfectly with the PR objective. The Conventional Commits badge is a nice touch, providing additional information about the project's commit standards.
Consider adding an alt text to the badges for improved accessibility. For example:
[](https://macalbert.github.io/envilder/ "Coverage Status") [](https://conventionalcommits.org "Conventional Commits")
Line range hint
16-35: Excellent addition of prerequisites!The new section provides crucial information for setting up and using Envilder. The AWS CLI installation and configuration instructions are clear and detailed.
Consider adding a note about the potential security implications of storing AWS credentials locally, and suggest using IAM roles for EC2 instances or AWS CLI named profiles for improved security practices.
Line range hint
37-45: Great update to installation instructions!The addition of npm installation instructions alongside yarn improves accessibility for users with different package manager preferences.
Consider adding a note about the possibility of installing Envilder locally in a project, which might be useful for users who want to include it as a dev dependency. For example:
For local installation in a project: ```bash npm install --save-dev envilder # or yarn add --dev envilder--- Line range hint `83-96`: **Great addition of supplementary sections!** The sections for running tests, license, and contributing provide important information for users and potential contributors. The test command aligns well with the coverage badge added earlier. Consider adding a brief section on how to report issues or request features. For example: ```markdown ## 🐛 Reporting Issues If you encounter any bugs or have feature requests, please file an issue on the [GitHub issues page](https://github.com/macalbert/envilder/issues).
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/coverage-report.yml (2 hunks)
- README.md (3 hunks)
- vitest.config.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/coverage-report.yml
33-33: if: condition "${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}
(if-cond)
🔇 Additional comments (4)
vitest.config.js (1)
8-8: LGTM! This change enables coverage badge generation.The addition of 'json-summary' to the reporter array is a good change. This will generate a JSON summary of the coverage report, which is typically used to create coverage badges. This aligns well with the PR objective of adding a coverage badge to the README.md file.
.github/workflows/coverage-report.yml (1)
38-41: Improved Dependabot PR identificationThe change to use a precise comparison
"${{ github.actor }}" == "dependabot[bot]"instead of a wildcard check is a good improvement. This ensures that only pull requests from the specific Dependabot bot are recognized, enhancing the accuracy of the check.README.md (2)
Line range hint
47-81: Clear and helpful usage instructions!The usage and example sections provide clear instructions and a practical example of how to use Envilder. The sample output is particularly helpful for users to understand what to expect.
Line range hint
1-96: Overall excellent improvements to the README!The changes significantly enhance the documentation quality, making it more comprehensive and user-friendly. The addition of the coverage badge meets the PR objective, and the extra improvements (Conventional Commits badge, expanded prerequisites, clearer installation instructions, etc.) add substantial value to the project documentation.
| @@ -30,12 +30,12 @@ jobs: | |||
| name: github-pages | |||
| url: ${{ steps.deployment.outputs.page_url }} | |||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |||
| if: ${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft }} | |||
| if: ${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the job condition for better readability
The current condition is correct but can be simplified for better readability. The ${{ }} syntax is not needed for each individual condition within an if statement in GitHub Actions.
Consider simplifying the condition as follows:
if: !github.event.pull_request.draft && github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main'This change maintains the same logic while improving readability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
33-33: if: condition "${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}
(if-cond)
| if: ${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v4 | ||
|
|
||
| - name: 🛠️ Setup Node.js with Cache | ||
| if: ${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} | ||
| uses: actions/setup-node@v4 | ||
| with: | ||
| node-version: "20.x" | ||
| cache: "yarn" | ||
|
|
||
| - name: 📦 Install dependencies | ||
| if: ${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} | ||
| run: yarn install | ||
|
|
||
| - name: 🔥 Run tests and collect coverage | ||
| if: ${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} | ||
| run: yarn test | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Setup Pages | ||
| if: ${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} | ||
| uses: actions/configure-pages@v5 | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Upload artifact | ||
| if: ${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} | ||
| uses: actions/upload-pages-artifact@v3 | ||
| with: | ||
| path: "./coverage" | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Deploy to GitHub Pages | ||
| if: ${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Consider using a job-level condition for Dependabot PRs
The addition of the condition if: ${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} to multiple steps is a good way to prevent unnecessary execution for Dependabot PRs. However, this repetition might make the workflow less maintainable.
Consider moving this condition to the job level instead of repeating it for each step. You can do this by adding a job-level if condition and removing the individual step conditions:
jobs:
build-coverage:
# ... other job configurations ...
if: ${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft && github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' && github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]' }}
steps:
# ... steps without individual conditions ...This change would simplify the workflow and make it easier to maintain, while still achieving the same result of skipping the entire job for Dependabot PRs.
| - name: Publish Results Badge | ||
| uses: wjervis7/[email protected] | ||
| if: success() || failure() | ||
| with: | ||
| result-type: lines | ||
| upload-badge: ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }} |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💡 Codebase verification
Security Concern with Third-Party Action
The wjervis7/[email protected] repository has low adoption metrics (4 stars and 0 forks), which may pose potential security and maintenance risks. It's recommended to verify the repository's reliability and consider using more widely-adopted actions to ensure the safety and integrity of your workflow.
🔗 Analysis chain
Approval for badge generation with security consideration
The addition of the "Publish Results Badge" step is a good enhancement to provide visibility into the code coverage. The configuration to run on both success and failure ensures the badge is always updated, and the conditional upload to the main branch is appropriate.
However, it's important to consider the security implications of using third-party actions. To ensure the safety and integrity of your workflow, please verify the following:
- Check the reputation and maintenance status of the
wjervis7/vitest-badge-actionrepository. - Review the action's source code for any potential security issues.
- Consider pinning the action to a specific commit hash instead of a version tag for improved security.
You can use the following command to check the action's repository:
This will provide information about the repository, including its stars, forks, and last update, which can help assess its reliability.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
gh repo view wjervis7/vitest-badge-action
Length of output: 4987
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get repository statistics: stars, forks, and last updated date
gh repo view wjervis7/vitest-badge-action --json stargazersCount,forksCount,updatedAt
Length of output: 1220
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get repository statistics: stargazerCount, forksCount, and last updated date
gh repo view wjervis7/vitest-badge-action --json stargazerCount,forksCount,updatedAt
Length of output: 1214
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Get repository statistics: stargazerCount, forkCount, and last updated date
gh repo view wjervis7/vitest-badge-action --json stargazerCount,forkCount,updatedAt
Length of output: 155
macalbert
had a problem deploying
to
github-pages
GitHub Actions
Failure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (1)
.github/workflows/coverage-report.yml (1)
33-78: Streamline workflow by consolidating conditionsThe changes to this workflow aim to run the coverage job only for non-draft PRs targeting the main branch, excluding Dependabot PRs. While the logic is correct, the implementation is verbose and potentially error-prone due to repetition.
To improve the workflow:
- Consolidate all conditions at the job level:
if: ${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft && github.base_ref == 'main' && github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]' }}- Remove all individual step conditions.
This change will significantly simplify the workflow, improve readability, and reduce the risk of inconsistencies while maintaining the same functionality.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
33-33: could not parse as YAML: yaml: line 33: did not find expected alphabetic or numeric character
(syntax-check)
🪛 yamllint
[error] 33-33: syntax error: expected alphabetic or numeric character, but found '&'
(syntax)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/coverage-report.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/coverage-report.yml
33-33: could not parse as YAML: yaml: line 33: did not find expected alphabetic or numeric character
(syntax-check)
🪛 yamllint
.github/workflows/coverage-report.yml
[error] 33-33: syntax error: expected alphabetic or numeric character, but found '&'
(syntax)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
.github/workflows/coverage-report.yml (2)
38-41: Improved Dependabot checkThe modification to directly check for "dependabot[bot]" is a good improvement. It's more precise and secure than using a wildcard check.
68-68: Apply previous suggestion to remaining stepsThe conditions added to the Setup Pages, Upload artifact, and Deploy to GitHub Pages steps have the same repetition and redundancy issues as mentioned in the previous comment.
The suggestion to move the Dependabot check to the job level and remove individual step conditions applies here as well. This change will simplify these steps and improve the overall workflow maintainability.
Also applies to: 72-72, 78-78
| @@ -30,44 +30,51 @@ jobs: | |||
| name: github-pages | |||
| url: ${{ steps.deployment.outputs.page_url }} | |||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |||
| if: ${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft }} | |||
| if: !github.event.pull_request.draft && github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Fix syntax error in job condition
The condition for the job is logically correct, but there's a syntax error. In GitHub Actions, expressions in if statements should be wrapped in ${{ }}. Also, for better readability, we can simplify the condition.
Please update the condition as follows:
if: ${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft && github.base_ref == 'main' }}This change will fix the syntax error and improve readability. Note that I've also simplified 'refs/heads/main' to just 'main', as GitHub Actions automatically expands this when comparing branch names.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
33-33: could not parse as YAML: yaml: line 33: did not find expected alphabetic or numeric character
(syntax-check)
🪛 yamllint
[error] 33-33: syntax error: expected alphabetic or numeric character, but found '&'
(syntax)
| echo "is_dependabot=true" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT" | ||
| else | ||
| echo "is_dependabot=false" >> "$GITHUB_OUTPUT" | ||
| fi | ||
|
|
||
| - name: Check if the workflow should run | ||
| if: ${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} | ||
| if: steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' && github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify condition and consider redundancy
The condition is correct but can be simplified:
'refs/heads/main'can be shortened to'main'.- The check for the base ref is redundant with the job-level condition.
Consider updating the condition to:
if: steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false'This simplification maintains the necessary Dependabot check while relying on the job-level condition for the base ref check.
| run: echo "The workflow is allowed to run for this PR" | ||
|
|
||
| - name: 🧲 Checkout | ||
| if: steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' && github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify and reduce repetitive conditions
The conditions added to the Checkout, Setup Node.js, Install dependencies, and Run tests steps are correct but repetitive. They also include a redundant check for the base ref, which is already handled at the job level.
To improve maintainability and readability, consider:
- Removing the base ref check from these conditions.
- Moving the Dependabot check to the job level.
Update the job-level condition:
if: ${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft && github.base_ref == 'main' && github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]' }}Then remove the individual step conditions. This change will simplify the workflow while maintaining the same logic.
Also applies to: 53-53, 60-60, 64-64
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 3
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
- .github/workflows/coverage-report.yml (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint
.github/workflows/coverage-report.yml
45-45: if: condition "${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}
(if-cond)
49-49: if: condition "${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}
(if-cond)
53-53: if: condition "${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}
(if-cond)
60-60: if: condition "${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}
(if-cond)
64-64: if: condition "${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}
(if-cond)
68-68: if: condition "${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}
(if-cond)
72-72: if: condition "${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}
(if-cond)
78-78: if: condition "${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}
(if-cond)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
.github/workflows/coverage-report.yml (1)
38-41: Approve Dependabot check implementationThe implementation of the Dependabot check is correct and efficient. It uses a direct comparison to "dependabot[bot]" and sets an output variable for use in subsequent steps. This approach is more precise than using a wildcard check.
| @@ -30,44 +30,51 @@ jobs: | |||
| name: github-pages | |||
| url: ${{ steps.deployment.outputs.page_url }} | |||
| runs-on: ubuntu-latest | |||
| if: ${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft }} | |||
| if: ${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft && github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }} | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify the job-level condition for improved readability
The current condition is correct, but it can be simplified for better readability. Consider updating it as follows:
if: ${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft && github.base_ref == 'main' }}This change maintains the same logic while improving readability. Note that 'refs/heads/main' can be simplified to just 'main' as GitHub Actions automatically expands this when comparing branch names.
| if: ${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }} | ||
| run: echo "The workflow is allowed to run for this PR" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Simplify condition and remove redundancy
The current condition is logically correct but can be simplified:
- Remove the redundant base ref check, as it's already handled at the job level.
- Simplify the syntax by removing extra
${{ }}wrappers.
Update the condition as follows:
- name: Check if the workflow should run
if: steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false'
run: echo "The workflow is allowed to run for this PR"This change maintains the necessary Dependabot check while reducing redundancy and improving readability.
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
45-45: if: condition "${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}
(if-cond)
| if: ${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }} | ||
| uses: actions/checkout@v4 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
🛠️ Refactor suggestion
Refactor workflow to reduce repetition and improve maintainability
The current implementation has repetitive conditions across multiple steps, which can make the workflow harder to maintain. Consider the following improvements:
- Move the Dependabot check to the job level.
- Remove the redundant base ref checks from individual steps.
- Simplify the syntax by removing extra
${{ }}wrappers.
Update the job-level condition:
if: ${{ !github.event.pull_request.draft && github.base_ref == 'main' && github.actor != 'dependabot[bot]' }}Then remove the individual step conditions. This change will significantly simplify the workflow while maintaining the same logic. For example:
- name: 🧲 Checkout
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: 🛠️ Setup Node.js with Cache
uses: actions/setup-node@v4
with:
node-version: "20.x"
cache: "yarn"
# ... (other steps without individual conditions)This refactoring will make the workflow more concise, easier to read, and simpler to maintain.
Also applies to: 53-54, 60-61, 64-65, 68-69, 72-73, 78-79
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint
49-49: if: condition "${{ steps.dependabot-check.outputs.is_dependabot == 'false' }} && ${{ github.base_ref == 'refs/heads/main' }}" is always evaluated to true because extra characters are around ${{ }}
(if-cond)
Description
Add badge coverage in the README.md
Summary by CodeRabbit
Envilder, with commands for bothyarnandnpm.