Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

avoid a misconfiguration infinite loop #38794

Open
wants to merge 5 commits into
base: 2.4-develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ergohack
Copy link

@ergohack ergohack commented Jun 5, 2024

Description (*)

The virtual type configurations, in di.xml files, are not supposed to be self‑referential, … but if they ever are this function will spin in an infinite loop.

Changes

Added a test to avoid a self‑referential mapping, returning the self‑reference instead of endlessly spinning.

Fixed Issues (if relevant)

unknown

Manual testing scenarios (*)

Configure a di.xml <virtualType …> node to be self‑referential (i.e. not actually virtual). This will cause the app to spin, infinitely, on the dereferencing attempt. Note that the self‑reference can be from a chain of <virtualType …> nodes and not just a single node.

Contribution checklist (*)

  • [√] Pull request has a meaningful description of its purpose
  • [√] All commits are accompanied by meaningful commit messages
  • [n/a] All new or changed code is covered with unit/integration tests (if applicable)
  • [n/a] README.md files for modified modules are updated and included in the pull request if any README.md predefined sections require an update
  • [unknown] All automated tests passed successfully (all builds are green)

Resolved issues:

  1. resolves [Issue] avoid a misconfiguration infinite loop #38822: avoid a misconfiguration infinite loop

The virtual type configurations are not supposed to be self‑referential, … but if they ever are this function will spin in an infinite loop.
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Jun 5, 2024

Hi @ergohack. Thank you for your contribution!
Here are some useful tips on how you can test your changes using Magento test environment.

Add the comment under your pull request to deploy test or vanilla Magento instance:
  • @magento give me test instance - deploy test instance based on PR changes
  • @magento give me 2.4-develop instance - deploy vanilla Magento instance

❗ Automated tests can be triggered manually with an appropriate comment:

  • @magento run all tests - run or re-run all required tests against the PR changes
  • @magento run <test-build(s)> - run or re-run specific test build(s)
    For example: @magento run Unit Tests

<test-build(s)> is a comma-separated list of build names.

Allowed build names are:
  1. Database Compare
  2. Functional Tests CE
  3. Functional Tests EE
  4. Functional Tests B2B
  5. Integration Tests
  6. Magento Health Index
  7. Sample Data Tests CE
  8. Sample Data Tests EE
  9. Sample Data Tests B2B
  10. Static Tests
  11. Unit Tests
  12. WebAPI Tests
  13. Semantic Version Checker

You can find more information about the builds here
ℹ️ Run only required test builds during development. Run all test builds before sending your pull request for review.


For more details, review the Code Contributions documentation.
Join Magento Community Engineering Slack and ask your questions in #github channel.

@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot moved this from Review in Progress to Ready for Testing in Pull Requests Dashboard Jun 7, 2024
@hostep hostep removed their assignment Jun 8, 2024
@hostep
Copy link
Contributor

hostep commented Jun 8, 2024

@magento run all tests

@m2-community-project m2-community-project bot moved this from Review in Progress to Ready for Testing in Pull Requests Dashboard Jun 8, 2024
@engcom-Bravo engcom-Bravo added the Triage: Dev.Experience Issue related to Developer Experience and needs help with Triage to Confirm or Reject it label Jun 10, 2024
@engcom-Charlie
Copy link
Contributor

@magento create issue

@engcom-Charlie engcom-Charlie added the Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. label Jun 11, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Progress: ready for testing Triage: Dev.Experience Issue related to Developer Experience and needs help with Triage to Confirm or Reject it
Projects
Pull Requests Dashboard
  
Ready for Testing
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[Issue] avoid a misconfiguration infinite loop
5 participants