Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

make load functions compatible with pathlib #1176

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 16, 2024

Conversation

Louis-Pujol
Copy link
Contributor

@Louis-Pujol Louis-Pujol commented Aug 13, 2024

Mi @marcomusy

This PR follows issue #1169 the load functions now accept pathlib.Path as input, nothing changed in the behavior of the functions, the paths objects are converted to strings at the beginning.

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Aug 13, 2024

Walkthrough

The updates to the Vedo library's file_io.py file focus on improving type annotations for various file-handling functions. The accepted input types have been expanded from str to Union[str, os.PathLike], enhancing flexibility and cross-platform compatibility. Additionally, all filename parameters are now converted to strings, ensuring consistent processing and preventing type-related errors. These changes significantly enhance type safety, usability, and API documentation clarity.

Changes

Files Change Summary
vedo/file_io.py Enhanced type annotations for file-related functions to accept os.PathLike. Introduced explicit conversion of filenames to strings for improved robustness across multiple functions, including load, loadStructuredPoints, load3DS, loadOFF, loadGeoJSON, and others.

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between b53ce12 and 8d1f4de.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • vedo/file_io.py (24 hunks)
Additional context used
Ruff
vedo/file_io.py

1002-1002: Local variable filename is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable filename

(F841)

Additional comments not posted (16)
vedo/file_io.py (16)

615-622: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


635-637: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


648-650: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


680-682: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


720-722: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


729-735: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


765-767: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


794-800: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


820-822: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


854-860: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


1132-1134: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


1165-1173: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


Line range hint 1354-1369:
LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


1696-1703: LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


Line range hint 1720-1733:
LGTM!

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects and convert them to strings are correctly implemented.


Line range hint 176-205:
LGTM! But verify the function usage in the codebase.

The changes to accept os.PathLike objects are well-implemented. The conversion to string ensures compatibility.

Ensure that all function calls to load are updated to handle os.PathLike inputs.

vedo/file_io.py Outdated
Comment on lines 1000 to 1002
def _import_npy(fileinput: Union[str, os.PathLike]) -> "vedo.Plotter":
"""Import a vedo scene from numpy format."""
filename = str(fileinput)
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot Aug 13, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove the unused variable filename.

The variable filename is assigned but never used, which is unnecessary.

-    filename = str(fileinput)
Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
def _import_npy(fileinput: Union[str, os.PathLike]) -> "vedo.Plotter":
"""Import a vedo scene from numpy format."""
filename = str(fileinput)
def _import_npy(fileinput: Union[str, os.PathLike]) -> "vedo.Plotter":
"""Import a vedo scene from numpy format."""
Tools
Ruff

1002-1002: Local variable filename is assigned to but never used

Remove assignment to unused variable filename

(F841)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There is a typo here, the correct line is fileinput = str(fileinput). Corrected in the following commit

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Louis-Pujol, thanks for pointing out the typo. I've noted the correct usage of fileinput = str(fileinput) for future reference.


Learnings added
Learnt from: Louis-Pujol
PR: marcomusy/vedo#1176
File: vedo/file_io.py:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-08-13T07:36:55.144Z
Learning: In the `_import_npy` function, the correct line is `fileinput = str(fileinput)`, not `filename = str(fileinput)`.

Note: Learnings are effective only in the context of similar code segments. To apply general coding guidelines, please configure review instructions. You can manage existing learnings in the app.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 8d1f4de and 1c9de19.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • vedo/file_io.py (24 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • vedo/file_io.py

@marcomusy marcomusy merged commit fd5d794 into marcomusy:master Aug 16, 2024
1 check passed
@marcomusy
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants