DEPRECATED

For Tailwind 2.0+ check out https://github.com/dcastil/tailwind-merge

This project will still work for Tailwind 1, but no further changes will be made.

tailwind-cascade

An attempt at making composable components possible using TailwindCSS.

Install

npm install @mariusmarais/tailwind-cascade --save

Why?

TailwindCSS is amazing, but using it to create component libraries is difficult due to the CSS cascade. (See some discussions.)

Normally you would only use the specific Tailwind classes you need (that's the point), but when you're building a reusable component, you run into trouble with overriding some styles.

You could:

• use completely unstyled base components like Tailwind React UI and style them one-by-one,
• use CSS-in-JS to handle overriding has part of the build (I hear good things about Twin),
• or throw caution to the wind and use this lib.

Usage

The twCascade function wraps classnames and supports all its standard usage patterns.

Create a base component with some Tailwind classes, wrapping the className with twCascade while letting the caller's className pass through:

// Example in React, but twCascade should work everywhere

import React, { FC, DetailedHTMLProps, ButtonHTMLAttributes } from 'react';

import { twCascade } from '@mariusmarais/tailwind-cascade';

interface MyButtonProps extends DetailedHTMLProps<ButtonHTMLAttributes<HTMLButtonElement>, HTMLButtonElement> {
  setActive?: boolean;
  canHover?: boolean;
}

const MyButton: FC<MyButtonProps> = props => {
  const { disabled, className, children, ...other } = props;

  const activeClasses = ['border-gray-500', 'bg-gray-500', 'text-white'];
  const hoverClasses = ['border-gray-700', 'bg-gray-700 ', 'text-white'];

  return (
    <button
      className={twCascade(
        'text-sm',
        'w-32',
        'border',
        'border-gray-300',
        'rounded-md',
        disabled && 'cursor-default',
        !disabled && !setActive && activeClasses.map(n => `active:${n}`),
        !disabled && canHover && hoverClasses.map(n => `hover:${n}`),
        setActive && activeClasses,
        !setActive && 'text-gray-900',
        className
      )}
      disabled={disabled}
      {...other}
    >
      {children}
    </button>
  );
};

In your app, create three buttons, two in a classic button group, the other on its own:

render() {
  return (
    <>
      <MyButton
        setActive={direction === 'left'}
        disabled={direction === 'left'}
        className="w-24 border-r-0 rounded-r-none"}
      >
        Left
      </MyButton>

      <MyButton
        setActive={direction === 'right'}
        disabled={direction === 'right'}
        className="w-24 border-l-0 rounded-l-none"}
      >
        Inbound
      </MyButton>

      <MyButton className="ml-10">Go</MyButton>
    </>
  );
}

Usually the duplicate width and border options can cause trouble, but not anymore.

Advanced

Use const twCascade = createTailwindCascader({prefix: 'some-tw-prefix-'}) if your Tailwind classes have a prefix.

How does it work?

Pretty well, considering none of it was supposed to work this way...

All Tailwind classes are broken down into groups, like .object-bottom, .object-center, .object-left, and so on. Only the last class defined per group is kept.

For 90% of Tailwind this works very well, for the other 9.9% additional overrides are configured to allow cross-group overriding, such as .rounded-r overriding .rounded-tr & .rounded-br, and .rounded overriding all the other .rounded-* classes. (The other way around just works, since Tailwind generates more-specific CSS classes after more general ones, meaning the normal cascade works in your favor.)

It shouldn't be necessary to re-specify additional classes to override previous overrides, but hey, at least it's possible.

YMMV

Contributing

PLEASE HELP. Open an issue, and we figure it out.

Ideally, much smarter people than I can do away with the manual group definitions, simplify the build steps, and get rid of the unprofessional tone in the README.

Maybe there's a way for the TailwindCSS authors to make this lib simpler, or make it absolete. One can dream.

But this is a terrible idea!

Perhaps.