-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 43
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
tentative formalization of Vitali's lemma #973
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Overall this looks great. I've posted a couple questions here, but nothing deep. And I haven't looked thoroughly at the vitali lemma proof itself. But the structure seems fairly reasonable.
697cb52
to
6094827
Compare
f2a57df
to
e15af11
Compare
e15af11
to
89c513f
Compare
450b010
to
33f74fc
Compare
33f74fc
to
2c56766
Compare
2c56766
to
09e5021
Compare
09e5021
to
4db723c
Compare
I still have to write the changelog and double-check the documentation, |
The main change with the original version is that we have introduced |
4db723c
to
604826f
Compare
* tentative formalization of Vitali's lemmas
* tentative formalization of Vitali's lemmas
Motivation for this change
track C of issue #965
(statements are being tested in other branches, to clean as soon as it stabilized)
Things done/to do
CHANGELOG_UNRELEASED.md
Compatibility with MathComp 2.0
TODO: HB port
to make sure someone ports this PR tothe
hierarchy-builder
branch or I already opened an issue or PR (please cross reference).Automatic note to reviewers
Read this Checklist and put a milestone if possible.