Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix archiving for range periods #22577

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024
Merged

Fix archiving for range periods #22577

merged 2 commits into from
Sep 12, 2024

Conversation

sgiehl
Copy link
Member

@sgiehl sgiehl commented Sep 11, 2024

Description:

with #22519 we have improve some checks around skipping invalidations / archiving for todays segments. Adjusting such check caused another bug to show up. The bug already existed before but only came to fruition with the changes lately.

Review

@sgiehl sgiehl added not-in-changelog For issues or pull requests that should not be included in our release changelog on matomo.org. Needs Review PRs that need a code review Regression Indicates a feature used to work in a certain way but it no longer does even though it should. labels Sep 11, 2024
@sgiehl sgiehl added this to the 5.2.0 milestone Sep 11, 2024
@sgiehl sgiehl requested a review from a team September 11, 2024 08:36
@sgiehl sgiehl requested a review from a team September 11, 2024 15:35
@sgiehl sgiehl merged commit a60611c into 5.x-dev Sep 12, 2024
21 of 25 checks passed
@sgiehl sgiehl deleted the fixrangearchiving branch September 12, 2024 14:31
jorgeuos pushed a commit to jorgeuos/matomo that referenced this pull request Oct 1, 2024
* Fix archiving for range periods

* adds another test
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Needs Review PRs that need a code review not-in-changelog For issues or pull requests that should not be included in our release changelog on matomo.org. Regression Indicates a feature used to work in a certain way but it no longer does even though it should.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants