Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding placeholder Github action workflow for Playwright tests #231

Conversation

rahulsuresh-git
Copy link
Contributor

@rahulsuresh-git rahulsuresh-git commented Nov 16, 2023

Summary

This PR introduces a placeholder GitHub action workflow to be used as a Playwright test workflow.

This follow up PR implements the workflow and adds tests:
#231

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (fd47bbe) 6.42% compared to head (1ba20cf) 6.42%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #231   +/-   ##
======================================
  Coverage    6.42%   6.42%           
======================================
  Files          11      11           
  Lines        1712    1712           
======================================
  Hits          110     110           
  Misses       1594    1594           
  Partials        8       8           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@mickmister mickmister merged commit 8b25f12 into mattermost-community:master Nov 16, 2023
4 checks passed
@mickmister mickmister changed the title Adding Playwright Github workflow Adding placeholder Playwright Github workflow Nov 17, 2023
@mickmister mickmister changed the title Adding placeholder Playwright Github workflow Adding placeholder Github action workflow for Playwright tests Nov 17, 2023
@avas27JTG avas27JTG added this to the v1.0.0 milestone Dec 22, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants