Skip to content

Avoid int overflow after year 2038#270

Open
bmwiedemann wants to merge 1 commit into
md-raid-utilities:mainfrom
bmwiedemann:timet
Open

Avoid int overflow after year 2038#270
bmwiedemann wants to merge 1 commit into
md-raid-utilities:mainfrom
bmwiedemann:timet

Conversation

@bmwiedemann

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Avoid int overflow after year 2038, so it can work until year 2106. Note: dates before 1970 will stop working.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem

This patch was done while reviewing potential year-2038 issues in openSUSE.

So it can work until year 2106.

See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Year_2038_problem

This patch was done while reviewing potential year-2038 issues in openSUSE.

Signed-off-by: Bernhard M. Wiedemann <bwiedemann@suse.de>

@mwilck mwilck left a comment

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good, but I'd appreciate a more verbose commit message. See comment.

Comment thread util.c
return 0;

mtime = sb[44]|(sb[45]|(sb[46]|sb[47]<<8)<<8)<<8;
mtime = sb[44]|(sb[45]|(sb[46]|(unsigned int)sb[47]<<8)<<8)<<8;

@mwilck mwilck Jun 5, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This needs more explanation in the commit message. AFAIU this is effective because it overrides the standard integral promotion in C, which counter-intuitively promotes unsigned char to int if, as usual, the size of the latter type is larger than the size of the former.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Extending this with explanation from claude:

  • sb is unsigned char[], so each element is unsigned char
  • C's integer promotion rules promote unsigned char to int before any arithmetic
  • All intermediate computations are therefore signed int
  • For timestamps after 2038-01-19 03:14:07 UTC, sb[47] >= 0x80 (the MSB has its high bit set)
  • Eventually this means a 1 is shifted into bit 31 of a signed int — this is undefined behavior in C (pre-C23), because left-shifting into the sign bit of a signed integer is UB
  • On every real implementation, this produces a negative int
  • When assigned to a 64-bit time_t (the type on all modern 64-bit Linux), the negative int is sign-extended to a negative time_t, representing a date before the Unix epoch — completely wrong

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants