forked from bitcoin/bips
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[pull] master from bitcoin:master #41
Open
pull
wants to merge
89
commits into
meonBot:master
Choose a base branch
from
bitcoin:master
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
The reference sender implementation and \`payjoin proposal\` test vectors are adjusted accordingly. According to the psbt Input Finalizer spec "All other data except the UTXO and unknown fields in the input key-value map should be cleared from the PSBT. The UTXO should be kept to allow Transaction Extractors to verify the final network serialized transaction." I ran into a problem where an LND acting as sender FinalizePsbt gRPC fails when sender utxo information is missing. I see no good reason to remove utxo information from the PSBT.
Disallowing mixed inputs was based on incorrect assumption that no wallet supports mixed inputs and thus mixed inputs imply PayJoin. However there are at least three wallets supporting mixed inputs. (Confirmed: Bitcoin Core, LND, Coinomi) Thus it makes sense to enable mixed inputs to avoid a payjoin-specific fingerptint. To avoid compatibility issues a grace period is suggested. Co-authored-by: Martin Habovstiak <[email protected]>
The original text is ambiguous to allowing transaction cut-through or not. Transaction cut-through enables savings by posting multiple transaction intents through a single 2-party payjoin and is used in practice in payjoins today. Let's explicitly allow it in the text. Co-authored-by: Martin Habovstiak <[email protected]>
It's an optional parameter in BIP 21 Bitcoin URIs, but it doesn't hurt to make it explicit. Co-authored-by: Martin Habovstiak <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Falbesoner <[email protected]>
Co-authored-by: Sebastian Falbesoner <[email protected]>
Given that both BIPs are now final, calling them drafts, seem very stale.
BIP125: Update description of BIPs 68 and 112
* Update bip-0348.md * Update bip-0379.md
* typo bip-0087.mediawiki * typos bip-0088.mediawiki * typo bip-0098.mediawiki
* Update bip-0370.mediawiki * Update bip-0373.mediawiki
[BIP-373] Slight rewrite of evenness byte footnote for clarity
BIP39: replace incorrect word in Italian wordlist special considerations
https://github.com/btcsuite/btcutil/blob/master/gcs leads to a broken link. I'm assuming the correct replacement is at https://github.com/btcsuite/btcd/tree/master/btcutil/gcs since `btcutil` is a sub-package in `btcd`, as stated in https://github.com/btcsuite/btcutil/tree/master?tab=readme-ov-file
Co-authored-by: Jon Atack <[email protected]>
388: Add support for `musig` in descriptor templates
BIP-374: add generated test vector .csv files
…es-executable BIP374: update reference.py and secp256k1.py to be executable
BIP158: fix btcutil gcs broken link.
BIP372, BIP381: editorial fixups
Co-authored-by: Pieter Wuille <[email protected]> Co-authored-by: Anthony Towns <[email protected]>
…-signature-format BIP341: Explain the 64-byte signature format
`OP_SUCCESS188` is `0xbc`, not `0xbb`.
Co-authored-by: Yuval Kogman <[email protected]>
BIP345: fix OP_SUCCESS188 hex value
BIP375: Sending Silent Payments in PSBTs
Fix BIP 78 & BIP 174 Conflict: Keep input utxo data through input finalization
BIP78: Allow mixed inputs Redux
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
See Commits and Changes for more details.
Created by pull[bot] (v2.0.0-alpha.1)
Can you help keep this open source service alive? 💖 Please sponsor : )