Skip to content

Conversation

guspan-tanadi
Copy link

Notes for Reviewers

This PR fixes #

  • Update a link issue template Models
  • Update json schemas links in index

Signed commits

  • Yes, I signed my commits.

Copy link

welcome bot commented May 13, 2025

Yay, your first pull request! 👍 A contributor will be by to give feedback soon. In the meantime, you can find updates in the #github-notifications channel in the community Slack.
Be sure to double-check that you have signed your commits. Here are instructions for making signing an implicit activity while performing a commit.

Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hello @guspan-tanadi, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

Summary of Changes

This pull request addresses an issue with relative links in the documentation. Specifically, it updates a link in the Models issue template and corrects the paths to JSON schemas in the index file. The goal is to ensure that the links point to the correct locations, improving navigation and accessibility of the documentation.

Highlights

  • Issue Template Link Update: The link to 'Relationships' in the Models issue template has been corrected to point to the proper location.
  • JSON Schema Path Correction: The relative paths to the JSON schema files for 'relationships' and 'selectors' in the index file have been updated to ensure they resolve correctly.

Changelog

  • .github/ISSUE_TEMPLATE/models.md
    • Corrected the link for 'Relationships' to point to the correct documentation page.
  • index.md
    • Updated the relative paths for 'relationships' and 'selectors' JSON schema links.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist is currently in preview and may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments to provide feedback.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.


A link astray,
A path obscured from view,
Docs now align.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the area/ci Continuous integration | Build and release label May 13, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This PR updates relative links in the documentation. The changes seem straightforward and improve the accuracy of the links. However, I have a few observations regarding the changes.

Summary of Findings

  • Link Target Verification: Double-check that the content at the new link target in models.md is indeed what's intended to be referenced.
  • Relative Path Correction: Confirm that the new relative paths in index.md are correct and that the target files are located in the same directory as the index.md file.
  • Filename Change: Verify that the filename change from selectors.json to selector.json in index.md is intentional and correct.

Merge Readiness

The changes in this PR seem to improve the accuracy of the documentation links. However, due to the medium severity concerns raised, I recommend verifying the link targets and relative paths before merging. I am unable to approve this pull request, and users should have others review and approve this code before merging.

@winkletinkle winkletinkle requested a review from n2h9 May 24, 2025 19:35
@winkletinkle
Copy link
Member

Thanks, @guspan-tanadi!

@n2h9 would you like to review these proposed changes?

@jamieplu
Copy link
Member

@n2h9, will you review?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/ci Continuous integration | Build and release
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants