Closed
Conversation
…nter, __setitem__should keep MFEM object from GCed....
Member
Author
|
PR is made to trigger the test. |
Member
Author
|
Example asked in #253 can be done as follows. |
Contributor
|
@sshiraiwa let me know when this is ready I'm happy to test it out. |
Member
Author
|
Closing this one w/o merging, since this version will be baseline of PyMFEM4.8 |
Merged
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR includes
defined somehow. In this PR, MFEM_REGISTER_KERNELS is replaced to be empty macro. So that SWIG does not
see the lines containing this macro.
ToDo: