Current State
state_backend: issue
backend_migrated_from: null
pr: 47
pr_url: https://github.com/michen00/markdown-prose-hooks/pull/47
head_sha: a77367c123c68043807d9f6fa7b4056f5941c781
state: converged-merge-blocked
round: 5
ci: green
pending_reviewers: []
clean_signals:
- reviewer: copilot
family: github
sha: a77367c123c68043807d9f6fa7b4056f5941c781
propagated_through: []
source: https://github.com/michen00/markdown-prose-hooks/pull/47#pullrequestreview-5152053627
- reviewer: qodo
family: qodo
sha: a77367c123c68043807d9f6fa7b4056f5941c781
propagated_through: []
source: https://github.com/michen00/markdown-prose-hooks/pull/47#issuecomment-5599212299
reviewer_triggers:
copilot:
requested_at: 2026-09-09T08:56:11Z
request_via: review_request
qodo:
requested_at: 2026-09-09T08:56:14Z
trigger_comment_id: 5599185463
qodo_wontfix_items: []
qodo_stale_items: []
unresolved_bot_threads: 0
unresolved_human_threads: 0
base_ref: main
base_sha: da4b651249c627fae8f2f7f702071f51a6f3036d
behind_base: false
catchup_action: none
last_action: earned clean signals from both families on a77367c
next_action: human merge gate, since the ruleset asks for one approving review and GitHub does not let an author approve their own pull request
next_wakeup_at: null
wakeup_reason: null
escalation_reason: null
runner_pushed_commits: true
pr_body_update: updated-inlineNotes
Bot-review convergence is reached. Copilot returned approval-recommended at a77367c with no threads. Qodo has no review submission at this head, and does not need one: its clean path is the persistent summary advancing past the trigger plus a real-review marker naming the head, which comment 5599212299 provides, with zero unresolved Qodo threads and zero active summary items.
Five findings were raised across the cycle, four fixed and one an evidenced wontfix.
The title-limit divergence was this pull request's own: main had the template and CONTRIBUTING.md agreeing on 50 characters, and the change stated the post-number bound in the template alone. Fixed in 7649558, then corrected in d8ccfb9 — the first fix named the number without its leading space, which left the budget one character too generous, and both reviewers caught it independently. The space now sits in prose because markdownlint MD038 rejects it inside a code span, which is what the template avoids only by being an HTML comment. a77367c restored the colon in that comment, since HTML disallows a double hyphen in comment text and this was the only such comment body in the tree.
The transform-tier answer-key contradiction is real but predates this change: CONTRIBUTING.md:31 and CONTRIBUTING.md:35 carry it four lines apart on main, and corpus/README.md's "Adding a case" said nothing about answer keys before this pull request. Mirroring the existing rule into the tier that lacked the tooling neither introduced nor widened it, so it is settled in #65 instead, stacked on this branch.
reviewDecision is REVIEW_REQUIRED under a ruleset asking for one approving review, which is the remaining barrier and outside this runner's scope.
The pull request body is reconciled inline rather than through pr-body-update: that skill reads the working tree, and this session's main checkout sits on another branch with staged changes, so it would have aborted. The refresh adds the CONTRIBUTING.md change as the third contributor-facing place, corrects the Checks evidence from two files to three, and leaves the bulletin footer in place. Base was not touched.
One figure in the body was left alone deliberately. Its claim that 14 subjects on main exceed 50 characters and 6 of those are within 50 before the appended number does not reproduce under any scoping tried — all commits, first-parent, no-merges, or only suffix-bearing subjects give 31 and 23 at da4b651, and 30 and 22 at the merge-base this branch left main at. Substituting a different measurement into the author's argument would misrepresent it, so it is flagged for the author rather than rewritten.
Current State
Notes
Bot-review convergence is reached. Copilot returned approval-recommended at a77367c with no threads. Qodo has no review submission at this head, and does not need one: its clean path is the persistent summary advancing past the trigger plus a real-review marker naming the head, which comment 5599212299 provides, with zero unresolved Qodo threads and zero active summary items.
Five findings were raised across the cycle, four fixed and one an evidenced wontfix.
The title-limit divergence was this pull request's own:
mainhad the template andCONTRIBUTING.mdagreeing on 50 characters, and the change stated the post-number bound in the template alone. Fixed in 7649558, then corrected in d8ccfb9 — the first fix named the number without its leading space, which left the budget one character too generous, and both reviewers caught it independently. The space now sits in prose because markdownlint MD038 rejects it inside a code span, which is what the template avoids only by being an HTML comment. a77367c restored the colon in that comment, since HTML disallows a double hyphen in comment text and this was the only such comment body in the tree.The transform-tier answer-key contradiction is real but predates this change:
CONTRIBUTING.md:31andCONTRIBUTING.md:35carry it four lines apart onmain, andcorpus/README.md's "Adding a case" said nothing about answer keys before this pull request. Mirroring the existing rule into the tier that lacked the tooling neither introduced nor widened it, so it is settled in #65 instead, stacked on this branch.reviewDecisionisREVIEW_REQUIREDunder a ruleset asking for one approving review, which is the remaining barrier and outside this runner's scope.The pull request body is reconciled inline rather than through
pr-body-update: that skill reads the working tree, and this session's main checkout sits on another branch with staged changes, so it would have aborted. The refresh adds theCONTRIBUTING.mdchange as the third contributor-facing place, corrects the Checks evidence from two files to three, and leaves the bulletin footer in place. Base was not touched.One figure in the body was left alone deliberately. Its claim that 14 subjects on
mainexceed 50 characters and 6 of those are within 50 before the appended number does not reproduce under any scoping tried — all commits, first-parent, no-merges, or only suffix-bearing subjects give 31 and 23 at da4b651, and 30 and 22 at the merge-base this branch leftmainat. Substituting a different measurement into the author's argument would misrepresent it, so it is flagged for the author rather than rewritten.