Skip to content

Conversation

Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI commented Dec 15, 2025

Summary of the Pull Request

Removes unnecessary static_cast<enum WSLA_CONTAINER_NETWORK_TYPE> in WSLAContainerLauncher.cpp that became redundant after the member variable type was changed from int to the enum type.

PR Checklist

  • Closes: N/A (addresses review feedback on Implement container network mode #13886)
  • Communication: I've discussed this with core contributors already. If work hasn't been agreed, this work might be rejected
  • Tests: Added/updated if needed and all pass
  • Localization: All end user facing strings can be localized
  • Dev docs: Added/updated if needed
  • Documentation updated: If checked, please file a pull request on our docs repo and link it here: #xxx

Detailed Description of the Pull Request / Additional comments

The m_containerNetworkType member variable type was changed from int to WSLA_CONTAINER_NETWORK_TYPE in commit e0153c3, but the implementation still contained a static_cast when assigning to the options struct:

// Before
options.ContainerNetwork.ContainerNetworkType = static_cast<enum WSLA_CONTAINER_NETWORK_TYPE>(m_containerNetworkType);

// After
options.ContainerNetwork.ContainerNetworkType = m_containerNetworkType;

The cast is now unnecessary since both the source and destination are the same enum type. This improves type safety by removing the ability to bypass enum type checking.

Also added _codeql_detected_source_root to .gitignore to prevent committing this CodeQL build artifact.

Validation Steps Performed

  • Code formatting validated with clang-format
  • Code review and security scanning passed with no issues

✨ Let Copilot coding agent set things up for you — coding agent works faster and does higher quality work when set up for your repo.

Copilot AI changed the title [WIP] Update implementation based on review feedback for container network mode Remove redundant static_cast in container network type assignment Dec 15, 2025
Copilot AI requested a review from ptrivedi December 15, 2025 15:46
@ptrivedi ptrivedi closed this Dec 15, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants