Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[2.0] remove extended packages opus and opusfile #12036

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

anphel31
Copy link
Member

@anphel31 anphel31 commented Jan 23, 2025

Merge Checklist

All boxes should be checked before merging the PR (just tick any boxes which don't apply to this PR)

  • The toolchain has been rebuilt successfully (or no changes were made to it)
  • The toolchain/worker package manifests are up-to-date
  • Any updated packages successfully build (or no packages were changed)
  • Packages depending on static components modified in this PR (Golang, *-static subpackages, etc.) have had their Release tag incremented.
  • Package tests (%check section) have been verified with RUN_CHECK=y for existing SPEC files, or added to new SPEC files
  • All package sources are available
  • cgmanifest files are up-to-date and sorted (./cgmanifest.json, ./toolkit/scripts/toolchain/cgmanifest.json, .github/workflows/cgmanifest.json)
  • LICENSE-MAP files are up-to-date (./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/data/licenses.json, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSES-MAP.md, ./LICENSES-AND-NOTICES/SPECS/LICENSE-EXCEPTIONS.PHOTON)
  • All source files have up-to-date hashes in the *.signatures.json files
  • sudo make go-tidy-all and sudo make go-test-coverage pass
  • Documentation has been updated to match any changes to the build system
  • Ready to merge

Summary

What does the PR accomplish, why was it needed?
Remove unused packages opus and opusfile from extended repo in 2.0.

Change Log
  • Remove opus
  • Remove opusfile
  • Change sox and gstreamer1-plugins-base to not depend on opus or opusfile
Does this affect the toolchain?

NO

Test Methodology

@anphel31 anphel31 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 23, 2025 00:29
@microsoft-github-policy-service microsoft-github-policy-service bot added Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED main PR Destined for main labels Jan 23, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
main PR Destined for main Packaging specs-extended PR to fix SPECS-EXTENDED
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants