feat: Add support for using highlight without returning the field as the output field.

[aoiasd]

relate: #42589

[sre-ci-robot]

[ci-v2-notice]
Notice: We are gradually rolling out the new ci-v2 system.

• Legacy CI jobs remain unaffected, you can just ignore ci-v2 if you don't want to run it.
• Additional "ci-v2/*" checkers will run for this PR to ensure the new ci-v2 system is working as expected.
• For tests that exist in both v1 and v2, passing in either system is considered PASS.

To rerun ci-v2 checks, comment with:

• /ci-rerun-code-check // for ci-v2/code-check
• /ci-rerun-build // for ci-v2/build
• /ci-rerun-ut-integration // for ci-v2/ut-integration
• /ci-rerun-ut-go // for ci-v2/ut-go
• /ci-rerun-ut-cpp // for ci-v2/ut-cpp
• /ci-rerun-ut // for all ci-v2/ut-integration, ci-v2/ut-go, ci-v2/ut-cpp
• /ci-rerun-e2e-arm // for ci-v2/e2e-arm [master branch only]
• /ci-rerun-e2e-default // for ci-v2/e2e-default [master branch only]

If you have any questions or requests, please contact @zhikunyao.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 42.85714% with 12 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 75.99%. Comparing base (3fc309b) to head (ef3895d).
⚠️ Report is 10 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
internal/proxy/task_search.go	40.00%	6 Missing and 3 partials ⚠️
internal/proxy/highlighter.go	50.00%	3 Missing ⚠️

❌ Your patch status has failed because the patch coverage (42.85%) is below the target coverage (80.00%). You can increase the patch coverage or adjust the target coverage.
❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (75.99%) is below the target coverage (77.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #45984      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   76.04%   75.99%   -0.06%     
==========================================
  Files        1890     1890              
  Lines      295322   295335      +13     
==========================================
- Hits       224575   224434     -141     
- Misses      63319    63457     +138     
- Partials     7428     7444      +16     

Components	Coverage Δ
Client	78.17% <ø> (ø)
Core	82.72% <ø> (ø)
Go	74.04% <51.85%> (-0.08%)	⬇️

Files with missing lines	Coverage Δ
internal/proxy/highlighter.go	37.82% <50.00%> (+0.18%)	⬆️
internal/proxy/task_search.go	69.46% <40.00%> (+0.09%)	⬆️

... and 27 files with indirect coverage changes

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

[mergify]

@aoiasd cpu-e2e job failed, comment /run-cpu-e2e can trigger the job again.

[aoiasd]

/run-cpu-e2e

[aoiasd]

/ci-rerun-e2e-arm

[mergify]

@aoiasd cpu-e2e job failed, comment /run-cpu-e2e can trigger the job again.

[sre-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aoiasd, zhengbuqian

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• internal/proxy/OWNERS [zhengbuqian]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[mergify]

@aoiasd cpu-e2e job failed, comment /run-cpu-e2e can trigger the job again.

[mergify]

@aoiasd cpu-e2e job failed, comment /run-cpu-e2e can trigger the job again.

[mergify]

@aoiasd cpu-e2e job failed, comment /run-cpu-e2e can trigger the job again.

[junjiejiangjjj]

/lgtm