Skip to content

docs: add project architecture section to README - #289

Open
radhikatbbt wants to merge 2 commits into
mohu-org:mainfrom
radhikatbbt:docs/project-architecture-section
Open

docs: add project architecture section to README#289
radhikatbbt wants to merge 2 commits into
mohu-org:mainfrom
radhikatbbt:docs/project-architecture-section

Conversation

@radhikatbbt

@radhikatbbt radhikatbbt commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

What

Adds a new "Project Architecture" section to README.md, briefly explaining
the purpose of crates/, tests/, examples/, docs/, benches/, and
scripts/, plus a simple repository tree diagram.

Why

The README currently covers vision, goals, and tech stack, but gives new
contributors no overview of how the repo is structured, making it harder to
know where to start. Closes #282.

How

Inserted the new section between ## what's coming and ## status, matching
the existing README's lowercase header style and plain bullet formatting.
No code was changed — this is a documentation-only edit.

Checklist

  • cargo test --workspace passes — N/A, no code changed
  • cargo clippy --workspace -- -D warnings passes — N/A, no code changed
  • cargo fmt --all applied — N/A (Markdown file, not applicable, unchanged)
  • CHANGELOG.md updated (if user-facing change) — not applicable, internal docs addition only
  • Benchmarks added or updated (if performance-sensitive path) — N/A, no performance-sensitive code touched

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Added a new project architecture section to the README, outlining the repository layout and where to find key areas like library code, tests, examples, docs, benchmarks, and scripts.
    • Included a clearer directory-style view of the workspace structure.
    • Updated the license section formatting for improved readability.

Signed-off-by: Radhika Korade<koraderadhika881@gmail.com>
@radhikatbbt
radhikatbbt requested a review from Bbn08 as a code owner July 4, 2026 02:55
@github-actions

github-actions Bot commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

PR Check Summary

Item Value
Branch docs/project-architecture-section
Changed crates none
Files changed 1

CI will run: build, test, clippy, fmt, cargo-deny, DCO, semver.
Reviewer assigned from CODEOWNERS.

@coderabbitai

coderabbitai Bot commented Jul 4, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown

Review Change Stack

Warning

Review limit reached

@radhikatbbt, you've reached your PR review limit, so we couldn't start this review.

Next review available in: 39 minutes

Enable usage-based reviews in Billing to review now. Otherwise, wait until the next included review is available.
You're only billed for reviews past your plan's rate limits ($0.25/file).

How can I continue?

After more reviews become available, a review can be triggered using the @coderabbitai review command as a PR comment. Alternatively, push new commits to this PR.

To avoid repeated limits, reduce automatic review volume by pausing incremental auto-reviews earlier, using label-based review opt-in, excluding WIP or generated PR titles, or requesting reviews manually when the PR is ready. If your team needs uninterrupted high-volume reviews, an organization admin can enable usage-based reviews.

How do review limits work?

CodeRabbit enforces per-developer PR review limits for each organization. Most developers receive the normal plan review availability.

For paid Pro and Pro+ PR reviews, CodeRabbit uses adaptive limits for sustained high-volume activity. When a developer's recent PR review activity reaches the 95th percentile or higher among CodeRabbit users, additional reviews become available more gradually as earlier reviews age out of the rolling window.

Please refer docs for additional details.

Review details
⚙️ Run configuration

Configuration used: defaults

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro Plus

Run ID: 7f6e4c85-5f14-4618-b003-c6263e3a3ba8

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a814f86 and 6ad9d91.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md
📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The README was updated with a new "project architecture" section describing the Cargo workspace layout, including a bullet list of key directories and a directory tree. A trailing blank line was also added after the license text.

Changes

README documentation update

Layer / File(s) Summary
Add project architecture section
README.md
Adds a "project architecture" section describing the Cargo workspace layout, key directories, and a directory tree; adds a trailing blank line after the MIT license text.

Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes

Related issues: #282

Suggested labels: documentation

Suggested reviewers:

🐰 A rabbit hops through docs anew,
Mapping crates and tests in view,
A tree of folders, neat and clear,
One blank line added, license near,
Onboarding made easier too!

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5
✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly summarizes the main README documentation change.
Linked Issues check ✅ Passed The README adds a Project Architecture section, directory descriptions, and a tree diagram as requested.
Out of Scope Changes check ✅ Passed The only changes are in README.md and stay within the requested documentation update.
Docstring Coverage ✅ Passed No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands.

   Signed-off-by: Radhika Korade <koraderadhika881@gmail.com>
@radhikatbbt radhikatbbt closed this Jul 4, 2026
@radhikatbbt radhikatbbt reopened this Jul 4, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Docs: Add Project Architecture Overview to README

1 participant