Document project architecture in README - #290
Conversation
Added project architecture section to README with details on repository structure.
PR Check Summary
CI will run: build, test, clippy, fmt, cargo-deny, DCO, semver. |
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughREADME.md now documents the Rust Cargo workspace structure, describes key directories, includes an ASCII directory tree, and changes the ChangesREADME Documentation
Estimated code review effort: 1 (Trivial) | ~2 minutes Suggested reviewers: 🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 5✅ Passed checks (5 passed)
✨ Finishing Touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Inline comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 35-41: The README tree diagram is currently written as plain text,
so Markdown may render it as a broken list instead of preserving alignment.
Update the README section containing the repository layout by wrapping the tree
under the existing top-level entry in a fenced code block, keeping the directory
names and comments intact so the diagram renders correctly and remains readable.
🪄 Autofix (Beta)
Fix all unresolved CodeRabbit comments on this PR:
- Push a commit to this branch (recommended)
- Create a new PR with the fixes
| - mohu/ | ||
| ├── crates/ # library code, one crate per component | ||
| ├── tests/ # cross-crate integration tests | ||
| ├── examples/ # runnable usage examples | ||
| ├── docs/ # extended documentation | ||
| ├── benches/ # performance benchmarks | ||
| └── scripts/ # dev tooling and automation |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick win
Fence the tree diagram.
As written, this block will render like normal list text, so the tree alignment is likely to break in Markdown. Wrap the diagram in a fenced code block to keep the layout readable.
Suggested fix
- - mohu/
- ├── crates/ # library code, one crate per component
- ├── tests/ # cross-crate integration tests
- ├── examples/ # runnable usage examples
- ├── docs/ # extended documentation
- ├── benches/ # performance benchmarks
- └── scripts/ # dev tooling and automation
+ ```text
+ mohu/
+ ├── crates/ # library code, one crate per component
+ ├── tests/ # cross-crate integration tests
+ ├── examples/ # runnable usage examples
+ ├── docs/ # extended documentation
+ ├── benches/ # performance benchmarks
+ └── scripts/ # dev tooling and automation
+ ```📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
| - mohu/ | |
| ├── crates/ # library code, one crate per component | |
| ├── tests/ # cross-crate integration tests | |
| ├── examples/ # runnable usage examples | |
| ├── docs/ # extended documentation | |
| ├── benches/ # performance benchmarks | |
| └── scripts/ # dev tooling and automation |
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
In `@README.md` around lines 35 - 41, The README tree diagram is currently written
as plain text, so Markdown may render it as a broken list instead of preserving
alignment. Update the README section containing the repository layout by
wrapping the tree under the existing top-level entry in a fenced code block,
keeping the directory names and comments intact so the diagram renders correctly
and remains readable.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Caution
Some comments are outside the diff and can’t be posted inline due to platform limitations.
⚠️ Outside diff range comments (1)
README.md (1)
25-33: 📐 Maintainability & Code Quality | 🟡 Minor | ⚡ Quick winMatch the README’s existing capitalization style.
The new section prose and both headings are lowercase, while the surrounding README uses title-case headings and normally capitalized sentences. Please use
Project Architecture,Status, and standard sentence capitalization for consistency.Also applies to: 43-43
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate. In `@README.md` around lines 25 - 33, Update the README section headings to title case, specifically use “Project Architecture” and “Status,” and capitalize the new prose as standard sentences while preserving the existing architecture content.
🤖 Prompt for all review comments with AI agents
Verify each finding against current code. Fix only still-valid issues, skip the
rest with a brief reason, keep changes minimal, and validate.
Outside diff comments:
In `@README.md`:
- Around line 25-33: Update the README section headings to title case,
specifically use “Project Architecture” and “Status,” and capitalize the new
prose as standard sentences while preserving the existing architecture content.
What
Adds a new "Project Architecture" section to README.md, briefly explaining
the purpose of
crates/,tests/,examples/,docs/,benches/, andscripts/, plus a simple repository tree diagram.Why
The README currently covers vision, goals, and tech stack, but gives new
contributors no overview of how the repo is structured, making it harder to
know where to start. Closes #282.
How
Inserted the new section between
## what's comingand## status, matchingthe existing README's lowercase header style and plain bullet formatting.
No code was changed — this is a documentation-only edit.
Checklist
cargo test --workspacepasses — N/A, no code changedcargo clippy --workspace -- -D warningspasses — N/A, no code changedcargo fmt --allapplied — N/A (Markdown file, not applicable, unchanged)CHANGELOG.mdupdated (if user-facing change) — not applicable, internal docs addition onlySummary by CodeRabbit