Add disease-defining axioms where "duplicate" disease-gene assocs

[joeflack4]

Overview

I am not not 100% certain what Sabrina, Trish, and I decided at the Jan 15 tech meeting, but it seems to be that:

We should add 1 axiom for such cases, but only when all but 1 of the phenotypes is "included", and the axiom should be added for the non-"included" entry.

I was going to move forward with this (#184) when I realized that there are ~200 cases of "'duplicate' disease-gene assocs", but there is only 1 case in which one of the associations has an "included" title. I think this is less than we expected, so I wanted @twhetzel and sabrinatoro to review my analysis: Google Sheet

Additional notes

• Trish/Joe agenda topic