Skip to content

test(#296): fix TopicSeedData assertion + seed script docs - #318

Merged
mottych merged 4 commits into
devfrom
feature/issue-296-strategy-alignment-evaluation
Apr 15, 2026
Merged

test(#296): fix TopicSeedData assertion + seed script docs#318
mottych merged 4 commits into
devfrom
feature/issue-296-strategy-alignment-evaluation

Conversation

@mottych

@mottych mottych commented Apr 14, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Owner

Follow-up to #296: fixes the integration test that referenced non-existent \TopicSeedData.model_code, and documents how to run \seed_topics\ with \PYTHONPATH\ and \coaching.src.scripts.seed_topics\ (including single-topic seed for \strategy_alignment_evaluation).

Made with Cursor

- Assert basic_model_code and premium_model_code (TopicSeedData has no model_code)\n- Document PYTHONPATH + coaching.src.scripts.seed_topics for single-topic seeding

Made-with: Cursor
mottych added 3 commits April 14, 2026 14:47
- Satisfies GHSA-6w46-j5rx-g56g / CVE-2025-71176 (pip-audit)\n- pytest-asyncio 1.3.0 for pytest 9 compatibility; align pyproject optional+uv dev deps\n- Delete unused SAM templates and sam deploy scripts under deployment/\n- Point deployment/README at Pulumi; clarify workflows README S3 note\n- Ignore .artifacts-downloaded/

Made-with: Cursor
@mottych
mottych merged commit 41f8683 into dev Apr 15, 2026
1 check passed
@mottych
mottych deleted the feature/issue-296-strategy-alignment-evaluation branch April 15, 2026 02:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant